pakfanistan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 1,401 through 1,425 (of 2,183 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UNC Problem is an NCAA Problem #59829
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    I’ve got a friend who was a recruit in the late 60’s who said Carolina offered him a car, money, and to give his girlfriend a job.

    Of course he’s a huge Carolina fan. His favorite UNC player is Roman Gabriel. Seriously.

    in reply to: UNC Problem is an NCAA Problem #59772
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    It seems like if UNC is not punished, other member schools could use that as a precedent to challenge NCAA sanctions past and present.

    in reply to: The UNC Coaches Should’ve Known #59763
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    …and games played with ineligible athletes must be forfeited.

    The thought of UNC losing two or more banners makes me turgid.

    in reply to: The UNC Coaches Should’ve Known #59749
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    I’m on board with it shouldn’t matter who knew. Ineligible players are ineligible.

    in reply to: UNC Problem is an NCAA Problem #59727
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    This is all great, but I’m afraid nothing is going to happen. I think the NCAA, Swof and UNC cut a deal a while back. That’s the only reason the football program got even a slap on the wrist.

    I think you’re mostly correct, but there’s nothing like public outcry to shame people into action.

    in reply to: The UNC Coaches Should’ve Known #59721
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    I’d love to hear someone ask Roy if it ever seemed strange that when a player was nearing ineligibility, they magically got the exact grade they needed to maintain a 2.0.

    in reply to: Wednesday … the NEW Friday!! #59603
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    OMG guys, seven minutes to MASSIVE DISAPPOINTMENT.

    in reply to: Wednesday … the NEW Friday!! #59591
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    It will ‘all’ be ‘revealed’ to the public at a 1 PM presser. I’m taking some side action on the following lines:

    Number of times the phrase “had no knowledge” is uttered: over/under 7

    Number of times “the Martin Investigation did it’s job” is mentioned: over/under 5

    Number of times Jennifer Wiley’s picture is shown: over/under 4

    Number of questions actually answered: over/under 3

    Anybody else want in?

    Are we counting a Q/A period after the report?

    If so, over, under, under, under.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58987
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Kirby Puckett used to pork fat ugly chicks to break out of a slump. We need to give it a shot before we lose 12 in a row. Put a bow on a Krispy Kreme box, y’all!

    Look out Peace, here comes the Wolfpack.

    in reply to: 7 Suspended against Louisville #58958
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    I am ready for some new blood on defense. They can be no worse than what I have witnessed in person at Clemson, and in Raleigh vs. BC.

    Ahahahaa, I admire your optimism.

    in reply to: 7 Suspended against Louisville #58944
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Apparently Joe Wright has been dismissed from the team.

    I have no idea why, but he’s definitely not listed on the official roster any more.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58914
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Not exactly FB….but…

    PFANISTAN,

    I have been intrigued by your Abraham Lincoln Quote…which changes from time to time…

    Could you give a quick web reference to it or maybe explain it? I do NOT pretend to be a student of Lincoln or his history, but I can seem to locate it and the circumstances prompting his making it.

    I am sure I have over looked something, but when I google the quote, all I get are references to your posts here and other places.

    Thanks…

    You didn’t overlook anything other than a whirling crap storm I unintentionally started, which culminated in me offering a $10 bet to a certain keymaster that they couldn’t make a reasonable post in response to me. Then I changed my username and avatar to match that certain keymaster, and subsequently had my username changed so that I was locked out of my account. In memoriam, I added the, “I want my $10” quote, and attributed it to Lincoln because it amused me.

    It was pretty funny, in retrospect, but not something that is either important or even interesting.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58910
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    There’s a difference between close score and close to winning. You acknowledge that,

    We played very well. If it weren’t for a completely insept defense, we may just have been able to pull the upset of the season. The offensive play was excellent.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58888
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Those aren’t “close” losses.

    We played very well. If it weren’t for a completely insept defense, we may just have been able to pull the upset of the season. The offensive play was excellent.

    Does not compute.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58866
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Yea, and FSU hung 56 on us. Then Clemson torched us and five minutes in the game was over. Then<br>
    BC runs away with it. So yea, not close.

    Yes, I understand we lost. Close to winning is still losing.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58858
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Where did this, “not close to winning” think come from? We hung 41 on FSU.

    in reply to: State Loses 11th Straight in ACC #58850
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Slick talk eventually stops working without wins.

    This is not something I associate with Doeren.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58831
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    IThe talent is bad but it is not zero acc wins for two years bad. Five years is going to be a lifetime.

    I dunno….we only won games prior to Doeren because we had a moderate defense, and NFL quarterbacks. We haven’t had a running game since god only knows when. Andre Brown maybe?

    Last year was the perfect storm of suck, with a lack of talent, poor s&c, youth and inexperience, and injury.

    This year we’ve only played three ACC games, and I doubt we go winless, although I admit it does feel like a possibility.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58793
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    bottom line: it’s not a DD thing, it’s a DY thing.

    This thing goes all the way to the top.

    It’s the illuminati.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58788
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Can anybody remember what Doeren’s record in conference is? I can’t remember, and I’m too lazy to look it up. It can’t be good.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58640
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Sade’s got the yips.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58630
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    :O A stop? By my Wolfpack? It’s more likely than you think.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58619
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    I wish we had gone for it. Can’t stop anybody, so what difference does it make if they get it at our 40 or their 40.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58578
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    If we ever get a middling defense, we’ll be a scary team.

    in reply to: BC @ NC State open entry – updates from Raleigh #58573
    pakfanistan
    Participant

    Yep, Hines is going to be a badass.

Viewing 25 posts - 1,401 through 1,425 (of 2,183 total)