Predict the Games

These are only my guesses, but now is as good a time as any to make them. Remember, these are predictions, not hopes or best case scenarios. I wouldn’t be shocked by anything between 4 and 7 regular season wins. Feel free to add your own in the comments.

Game 1: vs. Central Florida (Win; 75% confidence) – This game scares the hell out of me. UCF has a good coach, and they are a veteran team coming off a very disappointing season. O’Leary would love to beat an ACC team, and his kids will be loaded for bear. I just don’t see Tom O’Brien losing his first game as head coach.

Game 2: at Boston College (Loss; 85% confidence) – I really wanted to pick a win here, but that’s not logical (just an emotional reaction to BC fan smack-talk in the offseason). BC returns more starters than we do, and was significantly better than us last year (despite the somewhat fluky loss head-to-head). I don’t like the scrimmage reports on our QB situation, and an early road game will likely exacerbate that problem. Enjoy your gloating, Eagle fans – it will be clear after 3 seasons who won this particular coaching shuffle.

Game 3: vs. Wofford (Win; 99% confidence) – We may not be good this year, but we won’t lose to Wofford. Even under Amato, I would feel good about that (he probably would have gone 2-10, beating Wofford and FSU).

Game 4: vs. Clemson (Loss; 70% confidence) – The Tiggers should be able to dominate the Pack physically (and run hog wild against our LBs), but their coach is one of two Bowdens on the hot seat, and a complete team meltdown is not out of the question.

Game 5: vs. Louisville (Loss; 80% confidence) – Louisville might be the best opponent on NC State’s schedule, but we’ll see how much they miss Bobby Petrino. I like our chances for a huge upset if this is a night game.

Game 6: at Florida State (Loss; 90% confidence) – Again, we should be dominated physically, and our non-existent depth should be giving us trouble against deep, athletic teams by this point in the season. To borrow from my BC thoughts – enjoy your gloating, few remaining members of the “Cult of Chuck” – it will be clear after 3 seasons who won this particular coaching shuffle.

Game 7: at East Carolina (Win; 55% confidence) – Here is the game where I believe Coach O’Brien will get us a win we wouldn’t have been able to achieve without him. With an off week to get healthy and prepare, I expect the Wolfpack to do some riot prevention against the Pirates. You’re welcome, Greenville Police Department.

Game 8: vs. Virginia (Win; 60% confidence) – I expect the Cavs to be in full free-fall mode at this point, as Al Groh prepares for the firing squad. It would be much better for the game to be a week later (UVA historically sucks in November), but late October will have to do. Should be nice weather for this game, so allow for extra tailgating time.

Game 9: at Miami (Loss; 85% confidence) – This is pretty much a repeat of the FSU prediction, but the Canes are slightly less imposing physically (and sans the Amato drama).

Game 10: vs. UNC (Win; 95% confidence) – Because TOB promised us. And the alternative is unthinkable.

Game 11: at Wake Forest (Loss; 80% confidence) – Many people will predict a win here, and I agree that the Deacs won’t likely repeat their stirring title run. However, their rushing attack is a particularly bad matchup for our linebacking corps.

Game 12: vs. Maryland (Loss; 55% confidence) – I think the Pack comes very, very close to winning this game and attaining bowl eligibility, but falls just short. A lack of depth catches up with you at season’s end, and we will be coming off a bruising, physical game against Wake. The timing absolutely sucks for us.

Predicted Record: 5-7 (2-6); Mathematical Median: 5.39 wins

BJD95, on the record.

About BJD95

1995 NC State graduate, sufferer of Les and MOC during my entire student tenure. An equal-opportunity objective critic and analyst of Wolfpack sports.

'07 Football General NCS Football On the Record Tom O'Brien

129 Responses to Predict the Games

  1. McPete 08/15/2007 at 1:41 PM #

    i predict it won’t be 69-14. take that to the bank!

  2. CaptainCraptacular 08/15/2007 at 2:06 PM #

    I’d never put money down against the pack, no matter what the situation.

  3. lush 08/15/2007 at 3:23 PM #

    well then, i guess ill just keep my head in the sand and youll keep your money where your mouth is….oh wait, oops, scratch that.

    we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

  4. Trout 08/15/2007 at 3:41 PM #

    I dont think the idea of L-Ville blowing us out is far-fetched at all. If the old coach were still there, I’d no doubt predict a 20+ point loss. He’s not, so that gives me some hope we can hang around. On paper, L-Ville is the best team we play this year. Talent wise, I would rank our opponents this way:

    1)L-Ville
    2)Miami
    3)BC
    4)FSU
    5)Clemson
    6)Wake Forest
    7)Maryland
    8)UVA
    9)ECU
    10)UNC
    11)UCF
    12)Wofford

    I think teams 1-4 are most likely losses. Teams 5-9 are most likely toss ups, and teams 10-12 are most likely wins.

  5. rkw 08/15/2007 at 3:45 PM #

    “There was an article on espn a while back that talked about the statistical probability of teams winning close games. It basically said that most teams with high penalties and negative turnover margins greatly improve on those the following year. Those two things result in winning more close games. I hope he was right!”

    If that really is true, then NCSU has been skewing against that trend for the last four years:

    2003: 53rd in TO, 87th in penalties
    2004: 114th, 111th
    2005: 55th, 96th
    2006: 112th, 95th

    (Penalties stats are official NCAA. TO stats are cobbled together from ESPN and Yahoo.)

    So, oscillating between mediocre and horrific on TOs and consistently bad with one horrific year on penalties. If not for the change in staff, I wouldn’t have much expectation of that pattern changing.

  6. waxhaw 08/15/2007 at 4:55 PM #

    The stat had to do with +/- turnover not NCAA ranking…. and number of penalties not ranking.

    Not sure if that would change or not. I’ll see if I can google the article.

  7. JimValvano 08/15/2007 at 5:13 PM #

    Phil Steele has us finishing 3rd in our Division, but notes that he very very seriously considered placing us 2nd behind FSU. Phil Steele for those of you who don’t know has had the most accurate preseason magazine each of the last 8 years. I think he knows his stuff pretty well. He also had us going to a bowl game…I think it was to whatever they’re calling the Charlotte Bowl Game now.

  8. Dogbreath 08/15/2007 at 9:45 PM #

    UCF: 23-20 (W)
    BC: 13-20 (L)
    Wofford: 24-10 (W)
    Clemson: 9-27 (L)
    L’ville: 13-38 (L)
    FSU: 10-44 (L)
    ECU: 13-24 (L)
    UVa: 16-13 (W)
    Miami: 7-20 (L)
    Wake: 16-19 (L)
    UNC: 20-16 (W)
    Md: 13-22 (L)

    4-8. I think we are really going to struggle at QB and OL and have a tough time keeping the offense on the field. We will be a run 1st offense, defenses will be stacked to contain it, and we will have a very tough time in the 3rd down passing game. Defense will be on the field for long stretches, and we don’t have a great deal of depth on our front seven.

    I see a Mike O’Cain type of season where we just struggle with depth and consistency, have a few very talented players but are outmatched overall.

    On the bright side, I think O’Brien can have us winning 9 games by year three, but the next two years are going to be tough.

  9. Wulfpack 08/16/2007 at 8:21 AM #

    UCF: W
    BC: L
    Wofford: W
    Clemson: L
    Louisville: L
    FSU: L
    ECU: W
    UVA: W
    Miami: W
    UNC: W
    Wake: L
    Maryland: L

    6-6

  10. noah 08/16/2007 at 9:17 AM #

    A slight detour — I mentioned the HBO series “Hard Knocks” last week. I saw Week Two’s show last night. It was a little better for Tank Tyler. The only place he was sleeping was in his bed this week. However, they did spotlight his snoring and his roommates inability to sleep through it. Tyler snores louder than I do (which means a chainsaw might get drowned out by it).

    However, on the field, Tyler was more impressive than their top draft pick. Tyler was quick and got a lot of penetration on the line. On the sidelines, it looked like the first-round pick was a little lost. Tyler seemed perfectly comfortable.

  11. terry gannon 08/16/2007 at 9:17 AM #

    UCF – Win – call it Pack 21-13
    BC – Loss – BC, 27-17
    Wofford – Win – Pack 31-14
    Clemson – Loss – close, but Tiggers pull out 20-17
    Louisville – Loss – hate to say it, but Brohm too much – Cards 30-17
    FSU – Loss – ‘Noles by 34-23
    ECU – Win, (gotta get this one) – Pack hangs 35 on EZU–35-14
    UVA – Win – 27-24
    Miami – Loss, but we keep it reasonable – ‘Canes 31-24
    UNC – they’re in our heads but not TOB’s – close Win for Pack: 26-24
    Wake Forest – Loss Wake steals it 21-17
    Maryland – Loss – Terps 20-16

    5-7

  12. packgrad93 08/16/2007 at 10:07 AM #

    off the subject, updated bball height/weight on gopack

    Horner 6’8″ 220lbs, don’t see him playng much 3

  13. primacyone 08/16/2007 at 12:27 PM #

    Decent football article on wral.com talking about the running game:

    http://www.wral.com/sports/story/1709881/

  14. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 08/16/2007 at 12:29 PM #

    “I think it was to whatever they’re calling the Charlotte Bowl Game now.”

    Seems like I read this year it is the Rupaul Queen City Bowl.

  15. GAWolf 08/16/2007 at 12:35 PM #

    Every year I chuckle at people who use practice stats to predict our upcoming wins and losses. Obviously you have to base your opinion on SOMETHING, but practice stats are undoubtedly the worst thing you could use to do so. Base it on who is returning, who is not returning, who the other team has returning, etc. But how many times have we made assumptions about our team’s alleged accomplishments in summer workouts to hype ourselves into a tizzy about how great we’re going to be only to be once again shot down with the realities of the regular season? Why must some of you continue to destroy your confidence in the Pack by setting unreal expectations based on so-and-so being in better shape and so-and-so getting more reps in practice. It’s silly, and I feel for you guys. But even more so I feel for our players and our staff who many times catch the backlash of our unreal expectations based on predictors that hold little practical weight. With all that said, I’m not one that believes the overall expectation of winning should ever be tempered, but I think we owe it to our staff to not let our collective egos as Wolfpack faithful set unrealistic goals for this team. We all want to win and we all want to win as quickly as possible, but that doesn’t mean that if this team has a losing record at year’s end we should jump off a cliff and drag the players and staff with us.

    Honestly, we’ve got a huge question mark at three very critical positions: O-line, QB and perhaps what might lose us the most games this year… the kicking game. Few people have discussed that, but looking back I beg each of you to ask yourself: how many times does the outcome of a game fall within the difference of missed/made field goals and how often is field position critical to the outcome (the majority of which is dictated by kickoffs and punts)?

  16. waxhaw 08/16/2007 at 12:53 PM #

    “….field position critical to the outcome (the majority of which is dictated by kickoffs and punts)?”

    I’d add penalties and turnovers to this.

  17. packbackr04 08/16/2007 at 1:11 PM #

    from gopack
    “Former NC State men’s basketball player Engin Atsür joined the professional ranks over the weekend, signing his first professional contract with Benetton Treviso, an Italian ULEB Cup club located in Treviso, Italy. Atsür inked a three-year deal, and will join the squad for its Summer League.”

    congrats Engin

  18. redfred2 08/16/2007 at 1:12 PM #

    noah, just to answer your question from way back up there, I’m predicting a 6-6, possibly a 7-5 record in TOB’s first season at the helm.

    Hey, you take it one extreme, I take it to the other. I guess we’ll find out in a matter of months.

  19. CaptainCraptacular 08/16/2007 at 1:33 PM #

    I’m on record of being pretty pessimistic this year (understatement if the year) in regards to Ws and Ls, but I won’t judge the season on those Ws and Ls. Instead I think I’ll be measuring success in terms of improvements in little things like turnover ratio (can the D improve their turnovers forced running some zone), penalties/game, offensive consistency, 3rd down success rate, QB yards/attempt, etc. I have said I’d be ecstatic if we can go 6-6, but I think in reality I would be happy this year if the team noticably improves in key areas. In any case, I’m still super excited about the season even though I think we are going to be 3-9 or 4-8.

  20. primacyone 08/16/2007 at 1:40 PM #

    Mike Vick . . . . .

    Should we talk about that on here?

  21. primacyone 08/16/2007 at 1:45 PM #

    ^in regards to how it might effect Frank Beamer/Virginia Tech/The Mike Vick Hall, etc.

  22. packpigskinfan23 08/16/2007 at 1:46 PM #

    so what running back are you guys highest on this upcoming year?

    I put my money on Baker having more yards and more carrys through the whole year… but Brown having the biggest game and some of the bigger plays.

    I just really like the consistency we get from Tony Baker.

  23. GAWolf 08/16/2007 at 2:33 PM #

    FWIW, if the Feds indict you there’s a damn good chance you’re going to jail. They only indict slam-dunk cases and typically only those if their intent is to see jail time. If Vick refuses to plea and tries his case and is found guilty, expect the Feds to seek the maximum possible punishment at sentencing. Federal Judges, as a rule, are pretty tight sentencers so expect IF Vick chooses to exercise his constitutional rights and go to trial that he gets hammered when… not if… he gets convicted. The lawyer pushing him to go to trial must be a money-grubbing idiot. OR he knows something the rest of us don’t know… but I’d wager on my first guess as being more accurate. All of this is said on my very outside perspective of the story and I will gladly clarify that its a learned speculation at best.

  24. lush 08/16/2007 at 2:53 PM #

    please, no vick. the whole thing is disgusting. the dog fighting isnt even the big issue. its the fact that he gets off on torturing and viciously murdering the ones who survive. he is mentally disturbed just like the serial killers and pyscopaths who start killing animals/pets when they are children. lock him up.

  25. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 08/16/2007 at 3:45 PM #

    “The Good Son”

Leave a Reply