Offseason Positional Analysis (PG)

As we wait for football to heat up, it’s as good a time as any to analyze the coming basketball season. Over the next few weeks, we will analyze the logical rotation and depth chart, based on position. First up is what should be the Pack’s second-weakest position – point guard.

State had lots of problems last year, any one of which could have destroyed the season. If problem 1(a) was team chemistry (and no, we’re not talking about JJ envy), then problem 1(b) was PG play. I remember attending the Red/White game last fall, and feeling very optimistic about the coming season. Ben, Fells, Grant, and BC were a bit rusty (I didn’t worry about that at the time – big mistake), but I was really impressed by JJ Hickson and Farnold Degand. Degand was a fireball, speeding past defenders, running the floor, and finishing in the lane. He also played defense, which almost brought on tears of joy.

In retrospect, the Red/White game said more about our other players’ poor offseason conditioning and complete inability to play perimeter defense or stop dribble penetration than anything else. But you know what? Farnold wasn’t half bad running the offense. He did push the ball, confidently bring it up court, and play solid defense. He gave good effort when other players seemed to quit (see Michigan State debacle), and showed flashes of being a plus offensive player (see narrow win against South Carolina, when Farnold saved our bacon). Then he blew out his knee against Cincinnati, and a complete horror show followed.

Marques Johnson was a deer in headlights on offense, but at least played marginal defense. Javi Gonzalez could bring the ball past half-court adequately, but had trouble getting the offense initiated. He was also smaller and slower than almost every opposing PG, which meant he didn’t usually score much, and was absolutely abused on defense. One notable exception – he whipped Greg Paulus’ ass. Too bad most ACC point guards aren’t that small and slow. Combined, MJ and Javi were as bad (if not worse) than the “avert your eyes” combo of Fells and Grant, when Atsur was hurt the previous year.

Who should start? Farnold Degand, obviously. Some folks have suggested a “quick” lineup with Javi at PG, and Degand at SG (with Degand bringing the ball up on offense). To me, this seems absolutely insane. Sure, Degand shot a great percentage from 3 last year, but let me introduce you to the concept of sample size. Most of Degand’s shots were also of the wide open variety, given that scouting reports pegged him as a speedy penetrator who couldn’t shoot. Plus, I would rather have one very weak position (SG) than spread it out and being weak at both the 1 and the 2. Leave Degand at the point, and maybe we’ll get adequate production.

What should the rotation be? This is the million dollar question. Ideally, we would get 30-35 mpg from Farnold. Coming back off ACL surgery, that would risk burning him out. We would be completely sunk without a 90-100% Farnold for ACC play. Perhaps Javi (and to a lesser extent, freshman Julius Mays) can hold up against lesser competition enough to limit Farnold to a maximum of 25 mpg until January. I doubt Julius Mays will be strong enough with the ball (or fast enough defensively) to log minutes at the point against decent foes, absent injury or foul trouble. We have to find another position for MJ – he’s simply not a PG in any way, shape, or form.

Position Grade: C-

About BJD95

1995 NC State graduate, sufferer of Les and MOC during my entire student tenure. An equal-opportunity objective critic and analyst of Wolfpack sports.

08-09 Basketball

90 Responses to Offseason Positional Analysis (PG)

  1. BJD95 07/11/2008 at 4:36 PM #

    Maybe the progress of Degand dictates whether or not we sell our soul for Wall. A healthy senior Degand, coupled with Lo Brown is a good backcourt. But without a PG…we can’t afford to suck again in 2009-10.

  2. PackGirl 07/11/2008 at 4:36 PM #

    You can count me among the Javi fans for sure but I really do think he will be playing more than 5 mins a game, whether Degand is at 100% or not. Javi improved exponentially over the course of the season last year and presumably that will continue, at least to some extent. Being thrown into the fire last year can only be a good thing for this year. My ‘take’ on Lowe not mentioning Javi much and putting all the focus on Degand is that he is setting up an excuse in case we suck again. Call me cynical (I am) but Lowe has used Degand as an excuse for last year too much in my opinion. I know this has been argued already, but IMO Degand was not all that impressive before he went down with the injury.

  3. wufpup76 07/11/2008 at 4:45 PM #

    Memphis and Oklahoma State – shady dealings??? WHAT!?!?

    NO F’N WAY – I don’t believe for one nanosecond that either of those institutions would EVER be involved in anything underhanded or untoward when it comes to the clean waters that are college athletics …

    AHEM … A-HEM (still trying to clear throat)

    Apparently Ok State is still tying to maintain it’s position as the “Oakland Raiders” of college athletics even though there is no longer a Sutton at the helm … “Give us your tired, your cheaters, your drug dealers and pimps – and let us turn them into fine young basketball players” … hmmph … “Everybody deserves a second chance (or fifth or sixth so long as they can benefit me).” – Eddie “Cheating Scumbag” Sutton

    As for Memphis and Calipari – well, why don’t we ask Jed about them … He has first-hand experience there (both with cheating at Memphis and dealing w/ slimy Calimari)

  4. Afterglow 07/11/2008 at 5:27 PM #

    If we land Lo Brown, I’ve noticed scout.com sometimes in captions describes him as a point guard. Perhaps he could jump in that role if things don’t pan out with Wall. Than again there is the saying that states Grandma could be Grandpa if she had balls; so who knows. I’ve had my doubts… frankly the beard throws me off.

  5. hball57 07/11/2008 at 5:40 PM #

    Can I first comment that Ferguson is a better athlete that most here think.

    Recovering from an ACL these days does not guarnatee a loss of speed these days. Based on his recovery time, he seems to have had a straightforward surgery, and we should feel a little more confident in his recovery (as opposed to Thomas).

    Javi sort of reminds me of Sidney Lowe. He doesn’t posses great speed and quickness, but he appears to be smart enough to overcome it with basketball IQ and strength, if he works at it. Sidney wasn’t all that quick, but if he got his shoulders into you he could control you. Javi does have some good instincts defensively off the ball; let’s see how he develops.

  6. Afterglow 07/11/2008 at 6:08 PM #

    It’s all together a different game than it was back then but I dare say, Javi is no Sidney Lowe. In fairness, you said “sort of reminds me” so I’ll give you that.

    Sidney as a floor general was as smart as they come. He was an extension of Jim Valvano meaning, he was a coach on the floor. He was also a good scorer and had better defense prowess. He had incredible court vision, practically able to that which was behind him. Having Whittenburg their helped as well as they both knew what each other were going to do before they did it. Also, his ability to pass the ball didn’t hurt things either. Where maybe speed wasn’t exactly his asset I think he made up in those other areas.

    In the same vein, I don’t believe Corchiani (to my recollection) was exactly that fast either but HE had similarities to Sidney Lowe: good floor general, extension of V, scorer, defense, and good vision and of course, Ice AKA Rodney Monroe. Again, it was a different game back then.

    I personally have a little trouble seeing the resemblances from Javi to Lowe. “Sort of reminds me”? Maybe, if I squint my eyes while drunk.

    Don’t get me wrong; I am not a Javi hater and think he had a lot of momentum going into next year. If he proves me wrong than hallelujah! However, I think he will prove to be a decent point that is used primarily to spell Degand. And honestly lets face it (unless Degand is indeed a diamond in the rough) Degand would also be utilized in the same way if we currently had a formidable floor general.

  7. Afterglow 07/11/2008 at 6:47 PM #

    hball57-I will say that Ferguson could be more of a wild card. Had he not suffered some pretty intense injuries to his hands or wrists (not sure which) he probably would be a totally different player.

  8. Trip 07/11/2008 at 9:41 PM #

    Ferguson does the “Right stuff” that few on our team do. He’s got good BB IQ and I could certainly see him getting good minutes as long as he’s getting some points.

    I’m a Javi fan… I say let him put on some muscle over the summer and then we’ll see that he can do.

    Fells/Mccauley must anchor this team. If they go out there not giving 110% then the other guys are just gonna follow suit. This makes me very unhappy and ends up with me drinking too much. Please, Fells, Mccauley… think of my liver.

    Degand showed flashes of good play but he was no where near consistant. Javi was better than Degand by the end of the year as far as the offense goes, but Degand will probably always have the upper hand on defense just thanks to his build. Lets not forget that Degand was also a tragedy at the free throw line.

    Fells at the 3 and rotate our other guards (Javi, Degand, Ferguson, Mays) at the other 2 spots until we figure out who wants to play. Good stuff may happen when Fells has less passing to do.

    MJ is way better suited for the 2/3 spot. Probably best at the 3. Too bad we’ve got a backlog of people who can play the 3 (Thomas, Smith, Fells, Harris…)

  9. wallacepark 07/12/2008 at 9:34 AM #

    Javi is our starting point guard until someone else steps up and takes that spot from him. Not only has Javi got the most experience, but Degand has never played against ACC competition. Degand makes a nice backup but is ideally suited to be a defensive 2 guard. Javi will be a pleasant surprise for a lot of people this year.

  10. Dogbreath 07/12/2008 at 11:12 AM #

    I think we will see a strict 8-man rotation this year:

    Starters (Estimate: 49ppg)
    PG: Gonzales 6’0 Forecast: 6.5ppg and 3.5apg; 25 minutes
    SG: Fells 6’5 Forecast: 12.0ppgand 2.0apg; 32 minutes
    SF: Costner 6’8 Forecast: 12.5ppg and 5.0rpg; 32 minutes
    PF: Smith 6’7 Forecast: 8.5ppg and 5.5rpg; 25 minutes
    C: McCauley 6’10 Forecast: 9.5ppg and 5.0rpg; 30 minutes

    Reserves (Estimate: 15.5ppg)
    PG: Degand 6’3 Forecast: 4.0ppg and 3.0apg; 15 minutes
    SG: Ferguson 6’5 Forecast: 5.5ppg and 2.0rpg; 12 minutes
    PF: Horner 6’8 Forecast: 6.0ppg and 2.0rpg; 15 minutes

    Dust-Ups (Estimate: 4.5ppg)
    SG: Mays 6’2 Forecast: 1.5ppg; 4 minutes
    SF: Williams 6’4 Forecast: 1.5ppg; 3 minutes
    SF: Johnson 6’5 Forecast: 1.0ppg; 4 minutes
    SF: Thomas 6’5 Forecast: 0.0ppg; n/a minutes
    PF: Harris 6’5 Forecast: 0.5ppg; 3 minutes

    I also think we will be lucky to win 7 conference games.
    I think we will average about 69ppg
    I think we are small and will get brutalized on the boards.
    I think we lack consistent shooters and reliable perimeter defenders.
    I think we have a serious leadership void.
    I think both freshman are 2 years away from being factors.

  11. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 12:21 PM #

    DOGBREATH – Interesting analysis. I like things on paper at this point; it’s unemotional allowing less investment in energy and, it’s cut and dry. At this point who knows who will step up, who will start, who will sit, how many points one will make-but it’s interesting to see a paper perspective as it kind of tempers my expectations.

    Last year we prematurely expected to win based on our “on paper statistics”, this year it looks like we will more than likely lose with our “on paper statistics”. With your approach, I’ve lowered my expectations but will be pleasantly surprised if things turn out differently. You never know. I’m not saying all things are grim, because in the deep recesses of my mind I believe somewhere things will turn; I just hope it won’t be in another ten years. Bleed red brethren.

  12. wufpup76 07/12/2008 at 1:12 PM #

    ^^Dogbreath has it about right in my view – at least when it comes to defense and rebounding … If we can do better than expected in those areas then maybe we could be on the NCAA bubble …

    I’ll take a wait and see approach to the offensive attack, but it can’t be much worse than last year’s attack … I hope Costner, McCauley, Smith and even Horner can really do some good work on the boards, otherwise we may be lucky just to get to 4 conf. wins again … I say this b/c this *could* be one of the worst defensive squads at State in recent memory … Fingers crossed that I’m wrong on that point

  13. redfred2 07/12/2008 at 1:30 PM #

    After reading some very good comments on this thread and getting OVERLY excited about BB again, as I always do, I sat back and thought about the overall, and what’s transpired since Sidney Lowe’s took over. He started his time here with a lot question marks, with a team lacking in what most would agree as the normal athleticism necessary for today’s game, but he did have one distinct advantage in senior leadership and a definite floor general already in place. Step ahead to season #2, unproven talent coming in to fill the huge void left by Atsur’s departure, and not an upperclassmen anywhere who was willing to set up and accept a leadership role or anyone who even tried to set a single example for the others on the team. Instead, we have the exact opposite, and a team turned upside down. A raw freshman comes in and demonstrates how to play the game with everyone else just watching and wondering why this has happened to them, instead of even trying to change their own fortunes or make any impact on the new pecking order. I was very disappointed in Grant, McCauley, and Costner, to say the least, and Fells has disappointed pretty much all of his time in Raleigh, so I do not have pity for any of the returning upperclassmen in that regard at all.

    Some of the earlier postings reflect what I believe what we do have as positives for this upcoming season. Again, I think most of us would agree that we’re below normal on the athletic scale, but what we do have are some players who have BB savvy and who do see the court very well. I would put Ben McCauley in that category for sure, and his passing ability reminds me a lot of Etimov’s. And though he might not have acquired the tools to get where he needs to be to make the play just yet, I would add Javi to the list, and Trevor Ferguson in kind of that same vein as Javier. The jury is still on Degand, but there where flashes of an ability to get ball where it needed to be in his game as well last season.

    Where all of this becomes a problem is that the new Coach, Sidney Lowe, has his heart set on a fast paced, up tempo game, with a Wolfpack BB team hitting the court running and always forcing the issue. Problem is, he doesn’t have anything close to the personnel to accomplish it at present, at least not in the very limited order that he has seen fit to use his talent thus far anyway. What Lowe has to do is to bide his time, readily adapt to having something different than what he wants, and then still find a way to accomplish at least enough success to hold the dogs at bay until he can get what HE wants talent-wise. The catch 22 is that he is not going to be able to continue generating recruiting interest with many more, if any more, BB seasons like the last one. Not there isn’t room to place blame the staff but I personally blame last season much more on the players than the coaches . If you disagree, just review pretty much any of game films and pay more attention to what happens away from the ball or the effort placed in rebounding for example.

    So whether it turns it to be good or bad in the long run and whether he has upgraded his personnel to his suit own needs at this point or not, I’d say that we should see a very different coaching style/philosophy emerging from Sidney Lowe in this upcoming season. I’ll welcome those changes as much as anybody on this site, and I’ll no longer be standing in Lowe’s corner if we get more of the same.

  14. redfred2 07/12/2008 at 1:53 PM #

    What I meant to add up there was…

    Where all of this becomes a problem is that the new Coach, Sidney Lowe, has his heart set on a fast paced, up tempo game, with a Wolfpack BB team hitting the court running and always forcing the issue. “But Lowe has more than over compensated for that shortcoming in athleticism to the other extreme, with a totally controlling and BB instinct limiting coaching style that is way too reminiscent of that of his predecessor’s, for my tastes anyway.”

  15. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 2:25 PM #

    Continuation>>>with accountability, structure and a staff that looks at the meaning behind the behavior and not the behavior itself then by enlarge, the classroom runs fairly smooth. Guess who we look to when the whole classroom is dysfunctional? The staff. And nine times out of ten, the reasons for our dysfunctions rely solely on the staff’s shoulder. It’s a parallel process that mirrors a dysfunctional home. Why is the kid struggling so much at home? In our case with our population-it’s because of the parents.

    Ultimately, does it come down to coaching? In my belief, yes.

  16. redfred2 07/12/2008 at 2:47 PM #

    AG, great point, and I agree somewhat except that dysfunction in a classroom/family starts early on amd covers a much border spectrum of topics than kids who are SPECIALLY RECRUITED TO PLAY BASKETBALL at a university. You show me where extra effort was put forth in terms of leadership or improvement and I’ll back off. Look at it individually, not as a whole, and it wasn’t apparent on any level or by any stretch of the imagination last season.

    Regardless of the off-court issues and I don’t care if I hated my coaches and teammates with a passion, I still wouldn’t go out into my own backyard and play a friendly game without trying harder than they did for the most part last season.

    If I had a choice of the starting line up I would more than willing to spot the opposing team 10m points from the onset with this one…

    1) Harris
    1) Javi
    3) Ferguson
    4) Smith
    5) Degand

    Put these guys in and let them show some effort FIRST, I don’t care, let that line up stay in and get down by 20 points, regardless of the score, the others wouldn’t even sniff the court until they knew damn certain that I wasn’t going to put up with anything close to lack of INDIVIDUAL effort that I saw last season.

  17. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 3:04 PM #

    Thanks. What’s funny is the post got cut off somehow. Here’s all of what I said.

    I think motivation is a key element to any success on the basketball court or any sporting venue and that lies solely on the coaching. I always go back to Jimmy V-incredible motivator and always said he sometimes had to believe in the kid before they believed in themselves. To some degree you’re right in that you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. Lowe (thus far) seems unable to convince his players that they are thirsty and or hungry.

    I remember comments in the first year of Lowe’s tenure like “his players would run through a brick wall for him”. Something happened somewhere where Lowe was unable to inspire his players any longer. Some things-I’ll admit-that where out of his control and some things that, were in his control.

    Every year, inevitably, some adversity is going to happen and a good coach has to know how to use it to his advantage. I will grant you that Jimmy V was surrounded by good players. The 83’ team-although deemed a Cinderella team-was a damn good team! V also surrounded himself with good staff. Certain elements be it: personnel, development, players and a focus on fundamentals-haven’t yet fallen into place and either they are going to or they are not depending upon what type of personality Coach Lowe has.

    V was a visionary, he dreamed it, he would talk about it, he would write it down on note cards and made sure everyone else was on the same page as he when it came down to his dreams. Will we ever see another V? Sadly, probably not. Are there elements that other good or excellent coaches in the league have that Lowe could bring to the table bringing us back to where we were fifteen, twenty years ago? Yes. There is something to be said for taking responsibility and some of the blame lands on the player’s shoulders, but ultimately, I place more blame on the Coaches than I do the players.

    I will lend a quick example. I work as a Youth Treatment Counselor and our cliental is emotionally disturbed children. Take your worst class clown; multiply that by five and then place ten of those in a class together. Ultimately you would think that would spell disaster but the funny thing is-if you run a classroom that provides a safe environment, with accountability, structure and a staff that looks at the meaning behind the behavior and not the behavior itself then by enlarge, the classroom runs fairly smooth. Guess who we look to when the whole classroom is dysfunctional? The staff. And nine times out of ten, the reasons for our dysfunctions rely solely on the staff’s shoulder. It’s a parallel process that mirrors a dysfunctional home. Why is the kid struggling so much at home? In our case with our population-it’s because of the parents.

    Ultimately, does it come down to coaching? In my belief, yes.

  18. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 3:16 PM #

    Test.

  19. redfred2 07/12/2008 at 3:21 PM #

    Um, that one word post was over my head, please explain if you will.

  20. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 3:23 PM #

    I’m losing some of my posts. I only got in the last part of what I wanted to say on the last one, so I wanted to see if I would get the whole word test in.

  21. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 3:36 PM #

    Here’s all of what I said from before <<<continuation and then the continuation repeated.

    I think motivation is a key element to any success on the basketball court or any sporting venue and that lies solely on the coaching. I always go back to Jimmy V-incredible motivator and always said he sometimes had to believe in the kid before they believed in themselves. To some degree you’re right in that you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. Lowe (thus far) seems unable to convince his players that they are thirsty and or hungry.
    I remember comments in the first year of Lowe’s tenure like “his players would run through a brick wall for him”. Something happened somewhere where Lowe was unable to inspire his players any longer. Some things-I’ll admit-that where out of his control and some things that, were in his control.

    Every year, inevitably, some adversity is going to happen and a good coach has to know how to use it to his advantage. I will grant you that Jimmy V was surrounded by good players. The 83’ team-although deemed a Cinderella team-was a damn good team! V also surrounded himself with good staff. Certain elements be it: personnel, development, players and a focus on fundamentals-haven’t yet fallen into place and either they are going to or they are not depending upon what type of personality Coach Lowe has.
    V was a visionary, he dreamed it, he would talk about it, he would write it down on note cards and made sure everyone else was on the same page as he when it came down to his dreams. Will we ever see another V? Sadly, probably not. Are there elements that other good or excellent coaches in the league have that Lowe could bring to the table bringing us back to where we were fifteen, twenty years ago? Yes. There is something to be said for taking responsibility and some of the blame lands on the player’s shoulders, but ultimately, I place more blame on the Coaches than I do the players.

    I will lend a quick example. I work as a Youth Treatment Counselor and our cliental is emotionally disturbed children. Take your worst class clown; multiply that by five and then place ten of those in a class together. Ultimately you would think that would spell disaster but the funny thing is-if you run a classroom that provides a safe environment, with accountability, structure and a staff that looks at the meaning behind the behavior and not the behavior itself then by enlarge, the classroom runs fairly smooth. Guess who we look to when the whole classroom is dysfunctional? The staff. And nine times out of ten, the reasons for our dysfunctions rely solely on the staff’s shoulder. It’s a parallel process that mirrors a dysfunctional home. Why is the kid struggling so much at home? In our case with our population-it’s because of the parents.

    Ultimately, does it come down to coaching? In my belief, yes.

  22. redfred2 07/12/2008 at 3:44 PM #

    “so I wanted to see if I would get the whole word test in.”

    Oh, I get it now, you’re implying that I wouldn’t let you get a word in, are you not? 🙂

  23. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 3:52 PM #

    Not at all, for some reason it (“it” being WordPress) is not taking all of what I write. I wonder if I just wrote too much.

    Here’s all of what I said before <<<continuation (in my last post and the the <<<continuation itself so that all is in context.

    I think motivation is a key element to any success on the basketball court or any sporting venue and that lies solely on the coaching. I always go back to Jimmy V-incredible motivator and always said he sometimes had to believe in the kid before they believed in themselves. To some degree you’re right in that you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. Lowe (thus far) seems unable to convince his players that they are thirsty and or hungry.
    I remember comments in the first year of Lowe’s tenure like “his players would run through a brick wall for him”. Something happened somewhere where Lowe was unable to inspire his players any longer. Some things-I’ll admit-that where out of his control and some things that, were in his control.

    Every year, inevitably, some adversity is going to happen and a good coach has to know how to use it to his advantage. I will grant you that Jimmy V was surrounded by good players. The 83’ team-although deemed a Cinderella team-was a damn good team! V also surrounded himself with good staff. Certain elements be it: personnel, development, players and a focus on fundamentals-haven’t yet fallen into place and either they are going to or they are not depending upon what type of personality Coach Lowe has.
    V was a visionary, he dreamed it, he would talk about it, he would write it down on note cards and made sure everyone else was on the same page as he when it came down to his dreams. Will we ever see another V? Sadly, probably not. Are there elements that other good or excellent coaches in the league have that Lowe could bring to the table bringing us back to where we were fifteen, twenty years ago? Yes. There is something to be said for taking responsibility and some of the blame lands on the player’s shoulders, but ultimately, I place more blame on the Coaches than I do the players.

    I will lend a quick example. I work as a Youth Treatment Counselor and our cliental is emotionally disturbed children. Take your worst class clown; multiply that by five and then place ten of those in a class together. Ultimately you would think that would spell disaster but the funny thing is-if you run a classroom that provides a safe environment, with accountability, structure and a staff that looks at the meaning behind the behavior and not the behavior itself then by enlarge, the classroom runs fairly smooth. Guess who we look to when the whole classroom is dysfunctional? The staff. And nine times out of ten, the reasons for our dysfunctions rely solely on the staff’s shoulder. It’s a parallel process that mirrors a dysfunctional home. Why is the kid struggling so much at home? In our case with our population-it’s because of the parents.

    Ultimately, does it come down to coaching? In my belief, yes.

  24. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 4:07 PM #

    No, not at all Redfred2. For some reason it (“it” being WordPress) will only take some of my posts. I don’t know if it’s because I wrote too much or what. Last time I had <<<continuation which was in reference to something I wrote which didn’t get accepted. I’m going to attempt to include everything before <<<continuation and then everything after that point to keep everything in context. We will see how it works on the next post.

  25. Afterglow 07/12/2008 at 4:35 PM #

    Part 1.
    I think motivation is the key to success on the basketball court or any sporting venue and that lies solely on the coaches shoulders. I always go back to Jimmy V-an incredible motivator who always said that he sometimes had to believe in the kid before they believed in themselves. To some degree your right in that you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. Lowe (thus far) seems unable to convince his players to BELIEVE they a thirsty or hungry.

    I remember comments in Lowe’s first year of tenure like “his players would run through a brick wall for him.” Something happened somewhere where Lowe was unable to inspire his players any longer. Some of these things-I’ll admit-were out of his control and some of these things, were in his control.

    Every year, inevitably, adversity is going to happen and a good coach has got to know how to use that to his advantage. I will grant you that Jimmy V was surrounded by good players. The 83’ team-although deemed a Cinderella team-was a darn good team. V also surrounded himself with good staff. Certain elements, be it: personnel, development, players and a focus on fundamentals, haven’t yet fallen into place for Lowe and either they are going to or not, depending upon what type of personality Coach Lowe has.

Leave a Reply