Mandel: “Shouldn’t Emmert Step-in [at UN*], too?”

With the unprecedented punishment levied against Penn State yesterday, Stewart Mandel says that NCAA “displinary czar” Mark Emmert “overstepped” and then touches on a question many of us are asking about the ever-inconsistent NCAA (SI.com):

“While there’s been much speculation about whether this fits this specific bylaw or that specific bylaw,” said Emmert, “it certainly hits the fundamental values of what athletics are supposed to be doing in the context of higher education.”

No argument there. Perhaps this truly is a turning point in the history of the NCAA. Perhaps this is the beginning of a new era where Batman Emmert flies in and saves the day every time the forces of athletic evil make a mockery of academic virtues.

He’d better. Otherwise, this will instead prove to be a crowning moment in NCAA hypocrisy.

Remember when most college football fans assumed Auburn and/or Cam Newton would endure some sort of penalty when the quarterback’s father openly solicited six figures from Mississippi State? The NCAA couldn’t do anything, Emmert insisted, because there was no rule on the books addressing that specific scenario. We’d best not hear that excuse again.

Remember the 2003 murder of Baylor basketball player Patrick Dennehy by a former player, and head coach Dave Bliss’ subsequent attempt to falsely portray Dennehy as a drug dealer to cover up for illegal tuition payments he’d made? Would Emmert (who was not yet with the NCAA at the time) step in if that indisputably heinous case arose today? If not, why? What’s the threshold in determining whether something is special-jurisdiction-caliber repulsive or leave-it-to-the-enforcement-department-level disturbing?

And have you read about the ongoing academic fraud scandal at North Carolina? Since at least 1999, athletes have repeatedly been steered toward a specific professor’s African and Afro-American Studies course that no one actually taught or attended. Last year’s NCAA investigation only scratched the surface. Considering how highly the NCAA portends to value academics, shouldn’t Emmert step in here, too?

“We don’t see this opening a Pandora’s box at all,” said Emmert. “This was a very distinct and very unique set of circumstances.”

That’s easy to say now. Nothing in the history of NCAA scandals has come close to the level of allowing a serial pedophile free reign to a school’s football facility, and basic faith in humanity make us inclined to believe that it will never happen again.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

UNC Scandal

54 Responses to Mandel: “Shouldn’t Emmert Step-in [at UN*], too?”

  1. runwiththepack 07/26/2012 at 11:01 AM #

    newt, i hope you’re right.

    But it appears more likely to me that, if the ncaa doesn’t address this, then the academic fraud thingie will be perceived as no big deal, except to Wolfpack fans, who always pick at UNC because they’re jealous. Instead of feeling guilt for perpetrating this, high-er ups consider it something that happened TO them.

    Unless UNC is dealt with as though this fraud thing happened at, say, Alabama, (which you KNOW would get Alabama pounded back to the Stone Age by the NCAA), then, yes, I would say that UNC generally will have gotten off lightly. If the NCAA isn’t going to make it clear that this is a big deal, nor the UNC faculty, then it ISN’T a big deal. Amazing double standard.

    I think you’re seriously underestimating the sheer hypocrisy, gall, and arrogance of UNC-CH

  2. highstick 07/26/2012 at 12:37 PM #

    Gross underestimating! A ton of them are still snickering and think it’s all been a big joke…

  3. sholtzma 07/26/2012 at 2:37 PM #

    I posted this on “the other site” and don’t ordinarily repost on both. But I’ll put this out there:

    ———————

    I am still willing to give the “new” NCAA more time to come down hard on UNC-CHEAT. But at some point in the future, if it becomes clear they will not act, we will have to.

    For example, at any NCAA game at State, where the NCAA banner is hung, we need to replace it with the same symbol with a line through it. Every game, forever.

    There can be chants of “N…C…A…A…Shame….on…you…you”. There can be signs people bring in that read “No Cheaters At All”.

    If students at other institutions do similar acts of protest, it will humiliate the NCAA publicly over and over–on TV and on radio and in the newspapers.

    That is just a taste of what the NCAA has in store if it does not act more broadly to stop the beyond-the-pale corruption.
    ———–

    My comments were received with the usual dismissals, which to some extent are justified when we hear calls for a grassroots campaign. But I am not necessarily calling for a grassroots campaign. I am suggesting that ordinary fans around the country are going to reach a point at which they will not tolerate the NCAA. All they can then do, and I suspect they will, is to begin to engage in more and more widespread acts of “nonviolent resistance”. Perhaps it will begin at PSU. Perhaps it will begin in the ACC over UNC-CHEAT. It will likely take the form of stickers that people wear, signs that they bring to games, boos in response to mentions of the NCAA, and the like.

  4. ancsu87 07/28/2012 at 1:26 PM #

    he NCAA will not get involved further because John Swafford is cut from the same mold as NCAA leaders and is one of them. Having attended school in the 1980s and being at UNC-CH often there were rampant evidence, comments, and observations that let everyone know UNC-CH under Swafford and Smith was a cheating hell hole. Smith had that same saintly attitude and worship that Joe Pa had. He just got away with it.

    What happened at PSU is sad and surely a huge criminal lawsuit that should be prosecuted to the fullest extent against those still livinjg.

    The PSU punishment is just CYA by the NCAA. Will this address the cheating and corruption in NCAA football? No but this will make everybody feel good that the NCAA cares about students, children and the right thing.

    They moved quickly on this (the one and only time) because they saw it was the PC thing to do plus a way to divert attention from the real NCAA problems/issues relating to athletics and student-athletes.

Leave a Reply