Jacobs: Is succession planning really successful?

The idea of “coaches in waiting” has evolved into prominence within the world of college athletics. The first ‘big’ one that I remember that was both formal and not family driven was in Purdue’s basketball program when Matt Painter was hired to ride shotgun alongside Gene Keady. Since then, the idea has taken root and spread throughout basketball and football.

Barry Jacobs takes a good look at the idea in this piece. We’d love to hear your thoughts about the topic.

As a little bit of a sweetner for the conversation — why don’t you imagine that NC State set up this type of scenario to replace Coach O’Brien in the next 5 -10 years? For example, what if a beloved and well-respected assistant coach like Andy McCollum was pre-ordained to as the next head coach when Coach O’Brien retired?

Recently FSU and Maryland took a different, non-filial route, paying much-sought offensive coordinators to stick around while articulating a time frame for the younger men’s ascent to head coach. That enabled both schools to fend off suitors for two of their most promising assistants, and answered questions of continuity sure to arise in the cutthroat world of recruiting.

Whether it was a smart long-term strategy is another matter.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

General

28 Responses to Jacobs: Is succession planning really successful?

  1. GAWolf 09/30/2009 at 9:39 AM #

    TJFoose: Only time will tell if we got the better end of that stick. The thought of those two at State makes me a little giddy. But as has happened, those two wouldn’t have stayed long. It was sort of similar to having Chow. It would have almost been better for Amato had we not had him for that short period simply because the quality of offense (granted we had Rivers) was never duplicated again. And such was the beginning of the end for Chuck…

  2. Daily Update 09/30/2009 at 10:49 AM #

    I think Chow was way overrated. We had a good offense after he left. He was good, don’t get me wrong. But who wouldn’t be good with Rivers, KRob, Cotchery, several NFL OL, Willie Wright, and Ray Robinson?

    As far as succession plans, I see no problem with them. But do they really mean anything? Of course not because things can change. I just read that Maryland owes their OC $1 million if he isn’t the coach in 2011. Making commitments like that this far in advance makes no sense to me. It said that Franklin turned down some lucrative offers to stay at Maryland. How has that commitment to Franklin worked for the program in the mean time?

    I see no reason not to have a plan, but I don’t know how sense it makes to tie up money into these plans.

  3. choppack1 09/30/2009 at 11:17 AM #

    tj – I was hoping that Paul Johnson was our main candidate. I have to say, I don’t know if I would have been pleased bringing in those 2 guys. As we just saw, Pelini wasn’t going to take a backseat to anyone and wouldn’t have been in Raleigh too long.

Leave a Reply