Beasley to K State? Maybe, Maybe Not. (Updated 12pm)

Michael Beasley is a 6’8 forward that can play the wing or the post
and is undoubtedly one of the five best high school players in this year’s senior class. Some recruiting services rank Beasley as the best prospect of the lot. Just last week he laid claim to some pretty significant hardware when he was named the Most Outstanding Player of the annual McDonald’s All-America game.

Why are talking about Michael Beasley today?

(1) This article from a Kansas newspaper from earlier this morning helps set the stage for you:

While Kansas State has shored up its next men’s basketball coach with the promotion of Frank Martin, the same cannot yet be said about its No. 1-ranked recruiting class.

Late Friday K-State announced that Martin, along with fellow Bob Huggins former assistant coach Dalonte Hill would both be promoted, but there is still some uncertainty in the future of top recruit Michael Beasley.

In fact, Beasley has seemed to go back-and-forth on his decision to fulfill his commitment to the Wildcats.

In Saturday’s Memphis Commercial Appeal, Beasley was quoted saying that wants out of his national letter of intent to K-State and that he wants to weigh his options again, while still leaving the Cats as a possible destination.

“I hope that they let me leave,” he said. “I haven’t brought it to their attention yet, but hopefully I can get a release. I’m not saying I’m not going to end up at Kansas State. It’s just I don’t want to go there and there be a coach I’m not getting along with, you know? Or I don’t fit his style of play. That’s not saying I’m not going to Kansas State. It’s just opening up my options.”

But during the Nike Hoop Summit game Saturday afternoon in Memphis, Beasley told a Fox Sports reporter that he would be going to K-State after all. However, he did say he would like to visit with Martin.

Beasley told the Commercial Appeal that he might have interest in the Memphis Tigers, Texas, or even joining Huggins at West Virginia.

Add those to a list of other schools that fellow KSU commit Dominique Sutton told The Mercury on Thursday have already expressed interest in the coveted 6-foot-10 forward. Sutton told The Mercury that N.C. State, Florida State and USC have already shown interest in the pair.

However, now the “package deal” Sutton spoke of Thursday night appears to be off, saying he will attend K-State, whether Beasley does or not.

“We always talked about going to the same college and that’s what we planned on, but with Huggins leaving, we didn’t think that would be K-State,” Sutton said. “Now though, I feel a lot more comfortable with things up there and I will be there. Mikey, I don’t know if he is planning on going still or not.

“That’s up to him.”

Repeated attempts to reach Beasley by phone were unsuccessful.

(2) On Sunday afternoon, CNNSI ran this article that was updated at 2am in the morning and included the following:

After producing eight points (3-for-15 from the floor) and nine rebounds in the Nike Hoop Summit on Saturday in Memphis, Beasley told SI.com that he was leaning toward seeking a release from his letter of intent so he could play at the University of Memphis.

But that view changed Sunday. “I’m committed to the school, not to the coach,” Beasley said. “I’m committed to the school, and I gave my word that I would play for Kansas State.”

Beasley’s mother, Fatima Smith told The Topeka Capital-Journal and The Kansas City Star that her son would honor the national letter of intent he signed with the Wildcats in November.

“The drama is over,” she said. “Yes, Michael will be there [at K-State] for the next school year.”

(3) ESPN hasn’t updated its Beasley article since Saturday, but he certainly doesn’t sound signed, sealed, and delivered to Little Manhattan:

Beasley said his phone hasn’t stopped ringing since the news broke, and that he has formalized an early list of schools that could be a good fit for him if released from Kansas State.

“I’m really thinking about Memphis right now. NC State and Florida State, too,” he said.

SFN Comments
This “Beasley talk” started late last week. We felt that a lot of change was going to happen in a short amount of time, so we chose to wait a bit before putting any of this on the blog. The fantastic Section Six followed the iterations of the story since Thursday (4/5). You can click here and scroll down and follow some of the entries from Wolfpack interested in K-State recruits? => K-State Saga => Beasley Sticks With KSU => Or Not.

We don’t anything about any recent connections between anyone related to Beasley and NC State. Back in the fall, we were very pleased to learn that both Beasley and OJ Mayo had contacted NC State to have some discussions with the program. Once Letters of Intent were signed it was obvious that the conversations had not led to any surprise commitments.

Situations like these (K-State’s coaching change) are a perfect example of WHY you talk with kids and plant as many ‘seeds’ as you can. You never know when they may bloom. If Michael Beasley were to commit to NC State, the Wolfpack’s program would feel A LOT of impacts – one of which would be immediate improvement on the court and one of which would be a loud and clear message to the nation and to future highly rated recruits that RALEIGH is a PLACE TO BE!

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

Basketball Recruiting General NCS Basketball

53 Responses to Beasley to K State? Maybe, Maybe Not. (Updated 12pm)

  1. westwolf 04/09/2007 at 10:48 AM #

    Does SFN have any concern about the chemistry on the team if we bring in Beasley? It seems to me that with Costner already being one of the top players in the Acc, along with Ben, and JJ a McDAA, and Smith a top 50 talent ALL needing minutes along the front line, that adding Beasely to the mix might be problematic. Hasn’t his attitude, maturity level been something mentioned by his coaches as an issue?

    Hey, don’t get me wrong, I want us to be ABSOLUTELY LOADED with talent whenever possible, but as V pointed out, there is such thing as too much talent, especially at one or two positions. Anyway…your thoughts?

  2. one00_proof 04/09/2007 at 11:15 AM #

    A lot of things have to fall into place for even the possibility of Beasley coming to be remote. IIRC, we will have 13 scholarship players next year pending no transfers and everyone qualifies. There seems to be some miscommunication too, his mother says he’s going to K-State, Beasley said he’s not, Beasley says me may but he wants out, K-State hires assistant coach, etc.

    Beasley has had issues about maturity, attitude and motivation but his talent is definitely for real. I think we should go after Beasley only if we’re sure we have the resources to handle him and he can mesh with the team. On the other hand, getting Beasley would literally catapult State up the rankings next year.

  3. Mike 04/09/2007 at 11:15 AM #

    SFN: You didn’t read anything like that on this site. So, we aren’t going to discuss it.

  4. ncsu96 04/09/2007 at 11:30 AM #

    Thanks for tidbits, definitely a good thing to be looked at by the best. Interesting to finally see the info about Mayo, how crazy would that have been?

    I agree that the impact of Beasley-type player would be huge but then again Hickson’s stock is rising and some have called him a top 10 player…not too shabby.

    On a side note, it would be great if Statefans did an in-depth look at the new apr rules. Obviously, with the one and done (NBA) rule it will really impact college b-ball perhaps more than any other sport. How much will this impact schools taking one and done type players? I understand that if players leave in good academic standing that you’re fine but good luck trying to convince mr. lottery pick to hit the books come april.

  5. lush 04/09/2007 at 11:35 AM #

    This is the first Ive ever heard about Beasley considering State. How long have we been talking to this kid? How long have we been on his list? Were we in the mix before he signed with KSU?

  6. highonlowe 04/09/2007 at 11:43 AM #

    I’m sure Calipari has already fedex‘ed $ome recruiting info over to The Kid.

    Good luck Sid

  7. xphoenix87 04/09/2007 at 12:10 PM #

    When you have the opportunity to land a talent like Beasley, you take it and run with it, no questions asked. I can assure you, no one on the coaching staff is losing sleep over having too much talent in the frontcourt next year. Injuries happen, players slump, people get in foul trouble, etc. The last thing I’d be worried about is having a lot of guys at one position, and the first thing I’d be excited about is the potential to get the McDonalds AA MVP in a Wolfpack uniform.

    All that said, I’m extremely doubtful that there’s much chance of this happening. First, he has to decide he wants to leave K-State. Second, he has to get out of his LOI. Third, he has to decide on State over Memphis. I wouldn’t be betting on that one folks.

  8. one00_proof 04/09/2007 at 12:19 PM #

    While I don’t know the specifics, I do know we were involved with Beasley before he signed with K-State. We didn’t just swoop in on a him, we have been involved with the kid. On the flipside, Lowe better tread lightly if he’s going to pursue this.

  9. KChill 04/09/2007 at 12:24 PM #

    ^Or else?

  10. Rochester 04/09/2007 at 12:29 PM #

    Coaches a kid would want to play for if he didn’t care about schoolwork:

    1. Thuggins
    2. Calimari

    If Beasley gets out of his LOI, my money is on Memphis. It’s fun to see NC State included in the discussion, and I sure as heck wouldn’t turn the kid away, but I’ll be surprised if he winds up in Raleigh.

  11. BoKnowsNCS71 04/09/2007 at 12:51 PM #

    I thought we were already overextended on available scholarships?

    SFN: That assumes that nobody leaves the program and that all of the incoming recruits ultimately qualify.

  12. branjawn 04/09/2007 at 1:20 PM #

    This sounds strange, even as I type it, but if I were Sid I would go to Ben and BC first and talk to them about it. If they are like, “hell yeah, go for him, we want to go to the final Four next year!” then cool. Otherwise, I think it would be in bad taste to try and recruit the kid with 2 studs in place and another coming in. It might actually have a negative effect in the future recruiting if we were to sign this guy without consulting BC, Ben, and JJ and piss them off.

  13. RedTerror29 04/09/2007 at 1:47 PM #

    ^Yes, continuing to recruit 5-stars after already having picked a couple up has just killed recruiting at UNC, Duke, and elsewhere. Huh?

  14. branjawn 04/09/2007 at 1:54 PM #

    well, when a 5-star KNOWS that other 5 stars are coming, that is a lot different than this scenario. JJ committed probably thinking he’d be splitting time with 2 other guys at 2 positions.

  15. lush 04/09/2007 at 1:55 PM #

    What reason, besides selfishness over playing time, would any of our current players have for not wanting this kid? Look down the road and see how many players were worried about playing time. none. and they got a 1 seed in the ncaa tourney. I dont think the players should have any decision making abilities about what c-lowe wants for his team.

  16. brickman 04/09/2007 at 1:55 PM #

    yes having all that talent did hurt tarholes this year!!

  17. lush 04/09/2007 at 1:57 PM #

    Thompson, Stephenson, Wright, Handjob. pretty solid.

    McCauley, Costner, JJ, and Beastly. What is the problem with this????

  18. brickman 04/09/2007 at 2:08 PM #

    throw in horner and thomas and the 4 star kid cant think of his name

  19. CedarGroveWolf 04/09/2007 at 2:26 PM #

    Smith if he qualifies & signs

  20. PAPacker 04/09/2007 at 2:30 PM #

    tracy smith

  21. PAPacker 04/09/2007 at 2:31 PM #

    do we know any more about tracy smith qualifying?

  22. brickman 04/09/2007 at 2:33 PM #

    thanks cedarwolf that is a lot of players to have a good chimestry . but it is good to have players talking about state bball .something i have not heard in a while..

  23. branjawn 04/09/2007 at 2:51 PM #

    First of all, have you taken a look at UNC’s team from 05-06? Noel, Wes Miller, and Bobby Frasor were in the Top 5 in minutes played. The other two were Terry and Hansbrough. So they had 3 “open” spots coming into this year. Hansbrough lost .5 minutes of playing time per game this year, so basically he played the same as last year. He did not give up anything. Terry had a mere 3 minutes shaved off from last year. Danny green lost a minute and a half. So, to compare this situation to UNC this year is not equal. Our starters from last year will lose significant minutes. PLEASE READ: I guess my concern is based on this Beasley kid coming in and eating up a bunch of minutes. If he is ok being the 8th guy that’s one thing, but who really thinks that would be the case?

  24. branjawn 04/09/2007 at 2:53 PM #

    Even if you don’t agree with me, which I don’t care, give me props for having stats to go with my POV. 🙂

  25. lush 04/09/2007 at 2:59 PM #

    our starters will lose significant minutes because they were forced to play an abnormal amount of time last year because there was no bench. i think that they will be ok with more rest. i also beleive that beasley is better than smith, horner, and grant so i fail to see how he wouldnt get quality playing time. i cant beleive anyone is rationalizing why it would be good for the team NOT to have the #1 freshman in the country.

    hes probably not coming anyway so the point is mute.

Leave a Reply