ESPN: What we learned in Tampa

I’m going to tease with Bomani Jones’ second lesson first before delving into the real meat of this piece. Here is that second lesson:

The nation should be glad NC State didn’t make the NCAAs.”

Jones praises NC State and Sidney Lowe highly here:

My goodness, that team looked good. This wasn’t a charming Cinderella that got all the right breaks. This was a dangerous team.

The last thing anyone wants to face in the NCAA Tournament is a squad that has good athletes, two strong big men, a few capable ball handlers and a strong half-court game. After watching this team for four days, I couldn’t help but wonder how things would have been different if Engin Atsur, the player Gavin Grant referred to as their “general,” hadn’t missed 12 games with a bad hammy.

Also, consider what Grant said their approach was before the Duke game: “Don’t let anybody punk you.” A team with someone bold enough to say that from the dais of a postgame media session is a team to be reckoned with.

That’s great press, and Jones “got” it. Lowe’s team isn’t going to back down from a challenge. Lowe’s philosophy seems to be that shared by Patton and Frederick the Great: L’audace, l’audace, toujours l’audace! (Audacity, audacity, always audacity!) The red blazer is audacious. The up-tempo style is audacious. The declaration that the only goal for a 10th-seeded team is the championship or bust is audacious.

I’d like to take an aside and quote my favorite writer on Lowe’s audacity back when he was very sick with the flu and still donning the red blazer for a trip to Chapel Hill, because I think he was right in pointing out the foundation being laid for that leave-nothing-on-the-floor, 4-day effort that we saw this weekend and that Jones is praising now:

I want to underscore SFN’s point about Sid wearing the red jacket again. That’s just ballsy. It was ballsy enough at home. … Here Coach Lowe goes into Chapel Hill, with the frigging FLU, dons the red jacket again, and really gives everything he had. I doubt any of his guys will question him if he wants them to leave it all on the court. … [Further down] Mark my words, this will be a turning point on the season. Which way it turns I can’t say, but I’m optimistic.

Jimmy V’s “Dream” was audacious, too. But remember, a wise man once said, “Nothing can happen if not first a dream.”

Now back to Jones. His No. 1 will be a “shocker” to the Fowlers, Doyels, and the cultists:

1. Coaching is really important

NC State’s surprising run to the tournament championship game can be credited to many factors, but none more important than Sidney Lowe. …

This was all about the brilliant offense he runs, a motion scheme that still allows his players to use their individual talents to make plays. No team shoots 73 percent from the field (like the Pack did in the second half against Virginia) on luck and talent alone. The Wolfpack’s players were in great places at great times, and the reason for that was Lowe and his seemingly infinite reservoir of plays.

Let’s hit the highlights one more time: Coaching is really important — and — No team shoots 73 percent from the field on luck and talent alone. That means, by the way, that no team shoots 30 percent from the field on bad luck and lack of talent alone.

Wolfpack Nation is not so far removed from a time when we were told that the coach wasn’t to blame for players continually and reliably missing shots, game in and out (see Excuse No. 2). But I would like to point out that this year’s team shot 49.4 percent from the field, which was the highest shooting percentage since 1988-89.

That’s no accident. That’s coaching.

06-07 Basketball General Media Sidney Lowe Stat of the Day

172 Responses to ESPN: What we learned in Tampa

  1. branjawn 03/13/2007 at 3:52 PM #

    I like the idea of the whole crowd wearing red sport coats when Sid does next year. And maybe buying some whistles. Ok, no whistles, we can’t compete with Sid’s whistle. Maybe a pencil thin mustache though. haha

  2. noah 03/13/2007 at 3:54 PM #

    Can someone explain to me why it takes balls to wear red in Chapel Hill?

    I mean….do the UNC fans NOT know who he’s pulling for?

    When I went to an Eagles game, I didn’t wear my colors. I’ve been to Chapel Hill many times…I wear red and white. No one’s ever said a thing to me.

    Hell, for the UNC game during Rivers’ junior year, I wore a nice bright red shirt and sat almost on the 50 in the lower level. And I sat with seven other nice gentlemen all wearing equally bright red shirts.

    OUTSTANDING seats. No one said a word.

  3. branjawn 03/13/2007 at 3:58 PM #

    Ummm, your not the head coach for NC State. So, no one cares what you wear.

  4. Gene 03/13/2007 at 4:01 PM #

    Guys, regarding the “power” of Sid’s jacket, we need to note Roy broke out his sky-blue jacket for the ACC title game. The sky-blue jacket was more “powerful” than Sid’s red jacket, this weekend. I do not think Roy broke out his sky-blue blazer for the game in Raleigh.

    I am confident Sid will break out his red jacket eveytime we play Carolina. Will Roy break out his sky-blue jacket, when they are playing us? And if Roy does, whose jacket will be the most “powerful”?

    Inquiring minds want to know…

  5. Dan 03/13/2007 at 4:02 PM #

    I cant believe there is an argument over the red jacket. The red jacket should never divide. Only unite

    Rule #134

    1. Thou shalt not create strife amongst your bothers regarding The Red Jacket.

  6. beowolf 03/13/2007 at 4:08 PM #

    Can someone explain to me why it takes balls to wear red in Chapel Hill?

    Sure, the “mystery” is explained here, here, here, here and here, for starters.

    And RegularExpression’s post immediately following this one also explains it well.

  7. RegularExpression 03/13/2007 at 4:09 PM #

    I would say it takes balls because it is an admission that this game means a lot to us. We were 23 point underdogs that night and in recent history had served only as the backdrop for all night dunk-a-thons in the Dean Dome. If you get scorched in a game like that after admitting that you place great importance on it then you really set yourself up for professional ridicule. If you lose by 30, fans and media could rightly ask, “You put special emphasis on this game and lose by 30????”

    Sidney was willing to take that risk. Fans noticed. Don’t think his players didn’t either.

  8. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 4:11 PM #

    To me the blaser just plainly says, I’m here representing the RED of NC STATE UNIVERSITY, it’s important that people know who we are again, and that I’m proud to be a of it part of it once again.

  9. CedarGroveWolf 03/13/2007 at 4:13 PM #

    SId could wear a pink bow tie & it wouldn’t matter if he wins enough.

  10. CaptainCraptacular 03/13/2007 at 4:14 PM #

    *CC Harrison tied the ACCT scoring record that season that Brandon broke this year.*

    You mean the NCSU scoring record for the tournament? Randolph Childress had 107 points in 3 games in 1995 and has the ACCT scoring record as far as I know. Costner did not break that record.

  11. CaptainCraptacular 03/13/2007 at 4:15 PM #

    ^ Sorry, again did not see the posts above.

  12. beowolf 03/13/2007 at 4:15 PM #

    SId could wear a pink bow tie & it wouldn’t matter if he wins enough *[record skip] *[record skip] *[record skip] *[record skip]

    Please return your brain to its upright and locked position. Nobody’s talking about what Sidney wears usually. The talk centers around symbolism, big games, and NC State tradition.

    You know, things whose existence aren’t acknowledged by your cult.

  13. cedarblockhead 03/13/2007 at 4:19 PM #

    “When Sid wore that in Chapel Hill, I thought – now that takes balls. ”

    Now Herb had some bawls. He wore red ties all the time. That takes some guts.

    What was really gutzy was to run the PO before it was envogue. Look at all the success it is having now. And that is all thanks to Herb.

  14. branjawn 03/13/2007 at 4:29 PM #

    NCAAT talk: It seems that if #5 Butler beats #12 ODU, that will be the upset.

    Sid wearing the red coat in CH would be like me wearing a Jesus t-shirt into a mosque. The coat rules, Sid is the man. Let’s move on guys and start focusing on the game tonight.

  15. Astral Rain 03/13/2007 at 4:33 PM #

    Ol’ Yeller wore the light blue- was kinda hard to tell. That would be sweet as hell if he did that to raise the stakes some- would mean more when the wins keep coming in. Then again, I still think if the Average UNC team from this year showed up, State’s in the tourney with a 10-pt win Sunday.

    The State resurgance is going to be really bad on BC, GT, VA, MD though- not everyone can be winners- so somebody’s gotta take our place in the pecking order from above. VT was likely a 1-yr fluke, so I’m not too worried about them. Clemson, FSU, and Wake are lost, and Miami is even more lost.

    Here’s the only issue with the jacket- being “boned up” for some games means other games aren’t as important- and if we had won two more of those “unimportant games” this year, we’d have been in the dance.
    I want consistency, but good consistency (10-6 or better each year would be nice)- Sendekian 7-9 won’t cut it for me. I think it can happen, but I’m worried about the braincramps. Hopefully with a deeper bench there will be more concentration on the court.

  16. choppack1 03/13/2007 at 4:59 PM #

    AR – You shouldn’t have said the 10 and 6 thing, you’re just going to cue CW. 😉

    Seriously though – I worry about the same thing. Long term, I would say the following scenarios are not acceptable.

    1) Having 7 -10 conferences wins but beating Carolina only 5.5% of the time when they are tournament bound, not winning any ACC titles, only advancing once to the sweet 16.

    2) Beating the Tarheels 1/3 to 40% of the time, but NOT going to the NCAA tournament.

    Go back to my point that we only have to improve a little on what Sendek did to have a very successful program. …Beat Carolina AND go to the NCAA tournament. Win an ACC tourney or two, Advance farther than the Sweet 16…

  17. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 4:59 PM #

    Well, I guess if Sidney had worn a flannel shirt (wood chopper style) instead of the red jacket, then we would have lost, as expected, to UNC in Raleigh, then again to VT at home and away, and then won the games against Miami and FSU, this one season would have solved almost every worry for some folks out there. Again, basically the same final record, just in the more accustomed to wood chopper style.

  18. RedTerror29 03/13/2007 at 5:03 PM #

    I don’t really count losing to Miami and FSU, teams picked ahead of us (with our agreement), as games we should have won. Sure if we had played as well as we did for some games we would have been a 25+ win team, but that just isn’t possible. We beat all those teams we were supposed to beat in OOC. Now, if we lose to Miami/FSU/etc. next year when we’re picked 4th in the conference I’ll be concerned.

  19. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 5:11 PM #

    RedTerror

    I was just pointing out that some people seem to think there’s a real problem with winning some really HUGE games this season, versus say beating, or losing to, the teams that maybe were more closely matched.

  20. highstick 03/13/2007 at 5:11 PM #

    http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s6i16093

    Since we’re talking about Sid’s blazer, I almost choked when I saw this one this morning before I realized it was a “spoof”.

    Hansborough’s got one too for his mask.

    http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s6i16028

  21. RedTerror29 03/13/2007 at 5:13 PM #

    ^Yeah, I’m agreeing. It’s the same sort of backwards logic that says Lowe is a bad coach because we did so much worse during the regular season vs. the ACC tournament.

  22. GAWolf 03/13/2007 at 5:27 PM #

    The funny thing about Cedar and some other Pack “fans” is that they can’t seem to grasp something that countless Carolina fans have approached me about over the last two days. I think the majority of Carolina fans have sincere admiration and appreciation for Sid and the job he has done so far at State. The vast majority of them have mentioned the jacket with praise.

    Compare that to Amato… who they absolutely hated… and I think you can understand the difference. Actually, they all liked Sendek too but that was more in the “as long as they keep this guy around we can continue to focus on Duke” sort of way. It had nothing to do with knowledgeable Tobacco Road basketball fans having respect for the guy… it was indeed something only akin to self-promotion/preservation that drove their all-out support for and defense of Sendek.

  23. choppack1 03/13/2007 at 5:29 PM #

    rf – I don’t know if you’re addressing me, but if you are you’re missing where I’m coming from.

    I think that we can probably all agree that we’ll have to show more heart than we showed vs. Miami, BC, Clemson, Duke the first time and FSU if we’re going to win championships and hang some damn banners. I guarantee you that Sid believes that.

    Let me take you back a little bit to the second half of the conference season. We somehow manage to go 3-5 in the first half – w/ 5 of those games w/out Atsur. We’re looking at a second half of the season w/ games against Wake, Miami, FSU, GaTech, VaTech, Carolina, and 2 vs. UMd -and we’ve got a gimpy Atsur -but at least we’ve got him.

    I am not taking anything at all from this season. But haven’t we be done the “So and So Is the man road” enough to see that maybe we should temper our enthusiasm just bit? For me, this season became a great success when we beat Duke in the tournament. However, it’s one season.

    Were you jacked when Amato went 8-4 his first year? How did you feel when you saw the recruits he was reeling in? You think the Heels were jacked after Buntcakes went 8-5 his first year?

    This season has proven Sidney can manage the game well, he can recruit, and we’ve seen more growth in big men than we ever saw in the previous regime. However, if I’ve learned one thing the last 10 years, it’s that you really don’t know what a coach will do until he has but his true stamp on a team.

    We saw Les, Herb, and Amato have much better year’s than their predecessors. I’m not saying that Sidney won’t make us forget about these guys – I hope he does. I’m saying that this is only the beginning – and that 2 or 3 years from now, these results won’t be viewed as acceptable – I guarantee you that Sid agrees w/ that.

  24. Tau837 03/13/2007 at 5:35 PM #

    “The State resurgance is going to be really bad on BC, GT, VA, MD though- not everyone can be winners- so somebody’s gotta take our place in the pecking order from above. VT was likely a 1-yr fluke, so I’m not too worried about them. Clemson, FSU, and Wake are lost, and Miami is even more lost.”

    UNC loses Terry, Miller, and hopefully Wright, but they will still be strong and I’m sure they have a great class coming in again anyway. I assume they’ll be the clear favorite next season.

    Duke probably loses no one and presumably adds a good incoming class, so they should move up from this season.

    Virginia loses Reynolds and Cain. Not sure about their incoming class, but I’d say they slip a bit. Plus, I assume they won’t have the easiest league schedule again.

    VT loses 4 of their top 7–Dowdell, Gordon, Collins, and Sailes, so they should drop like a stone.

    BC loses Dudley and Marshall. Not sure about their incoming class, but I assume they will slide back a bit.

    Maryland loses Ibekwe, Jones, and Strawberry. Not sure about their incoming class. I assume they’ll be good but not as good as this season.

    Georgia Tech loses no one to graduation. Will Young or Crittendon leave early? If so, they’ll slide, but if not, they should be top 4.

    Clemson loses only Vernon Hamilton. I could see them improving.

    FSU loses Thornton. That’s enough for a slide.

    Miami loses Anthony Harris, but they aren’t good now. Can they improve? Probably not substantially.

    Wake loses Visser and Drum, which is likely enough to hold them down at least another season.

    So I’d say we would likely slot into a tier with GT, and possibly Virginia, Maryland, and/or Clemson, below UNC and Duke, but clearly above BC, VT, Miami, FSU, Wake. I think we’ll finish in the top half of the conference and should have as good a chance at third as anyone. Note, I’m not saying we can’t compete with UNC or Duke, just saying I expect them to probably finish higher in the conference standings next season.

    Obviously, I’m expecting our incoming players to pay immediate dividends to offset the loss of Atsur and Nieman… hopefully my expectations aren’t too high, but except in the final few Herb years, I do tend to be a State optimist.

  25. Tau837 03/13/2007 at 5:37 PM #

    chop-

    We saw Les have much better years than his predecessor? Clue me in here.

Leave a Reply