ESPN: What we learned in Tampa

I’m going to tease with Bomani Jones’ second lesson first before delving into the real meat of this piece. Here is that second lesson:

The nation should be glad NC State didn’t make the NCAAs.”

Jones praises NC State and Sidney Lowe highly here:

My goodness, that team looked good. This wasn’t a charming Cinderella that got all the right breaks. This was a dangerous team.

The last thing anyone wants to face in the NCAA Tournament is a squad that has good athletes, two strong big men, a few capable ball handlers and a strong half-court game. After watching this team for four days, I couldn’t help but wonder how things would have been different if Engin Atsur, the player Gavin Grant referred to as their “general,” hadn’t missed 12 games with a bad hammy.

Also, consider what Grant said their approach was before the Duke game: “Don’t let anybody punk you.” A team with someone bold enough to say that from the dais of a postgame media session is a team to be reckoned with.

That’s great press, and Jones “got” it. Lowe’s team isn’t going to back down from a challenge. Lowe’s philosophy seems to be that shared by Patton and Frederick the Great: L’audace, l’audace, toujours l’audace! (Audacity, audacity, always audacity!) The red blazer is audacious. The up-tempo style is audacious. The declaration that the only goal for a 10th-seeded team is the championship or bust is audacious.

I’d like to take an aside and quote my favorite writer on Lowe’s audacity back when he was very sick with the flu and still donning the red blazer for a trip to Chapel Hill, because I think he was right in pointing out the foundation being laid for that leave-nothing-on-the-floor, 4-day effort that we saw this weekend and that Jones is praising now:

I want to underscore SFN’s point about Sid wearing the red jacket again. That’s just ballsy. It was ballsy enough at home. … Here Coach Lowe goes into Chapel Hill, with the frigging FLU, dons the red jacket again, and really gives everything he had. I doubt any of his guys will question him if he wants them to leave it all on the court. … [Further down] Mark my words, this will be a turning point on the season. Which way it turns I can’t say, but I’m optimistic.

Jimmy V’s “Dream” was audacious, too. But remember, a wise man once said, “Nothing can happen if not first a dream.”

Now back to Jones. His No. 1 will be a “shocker” to the Fowlers, Doyels, and the cultists:

1. Coaching is really important

NC State’s surprising run to the tournament championship game can be credited to many factors, but none more important than Sidney Lowe. …

This was all about the brilliant offense he runs, a motion scheme that still allows his players to use their individual talents to make plays. No team shoots 73 percent from the field (like the Pack did in the second half against Virginia) on luck and talent alone. The Wolfpack’s players were in great places at great times, and the reason for that was Lowe and his seemingly infinite reservoir of plays.

Let’s hit the highlights one more time: Coaching is really important — and — No team shoots 73 percent from the field on luck and talent alone. That means, by the way, that no team shoots 30 percent from the field on bad luck and lack of talent alone.

Wolfpack Nation is not so far removed from a time when we were told that the coach wasn’t to blame for players continually and reliably missing shots, game in and out (see Excuse No. 2). But I would like to point out that this year’s team shot 49.4 percent from the field, which was the highest shooting percentage since 1988-89.

That’s no accident. That’s coaching.

06-07 Basketball General Media Sidney Lowe Stat of the Day

172 Responses to ESPN: What we learned in Tampa

  1. Dan 03/13/2007 at 10:44 AM #

    The other thing we learned in Tampa was that quality competition prepares you for quality competition. Our non-con schedule did us no favors against West Va, Cincy, and Alabama. We grew fat on easy prey. We were ready last weekend to play hard.

    Something we learn every Selection Sunday is that non-con SOS matter. Not only by itself, but in how affects the RPI ranking.

    ECU must be removed from our schedule. It is KILLING us. As is Garner Webb. Mount Saint Mary’s. Savannah St, Wofford, etc.

    I’ll cut a few of these teams some slack because they arent perennial RPI killers. UNC-W has been good in years past. Still, someone in the AD’s office needs to learn a little RPI’ology and apply it to schedule making. I’m all for a few easy wins, but NC State should not be playing the 270th ranked non-con schedule.

  2. Rick 03/13/2007 at 10:48 AM #

    The similarities end in the two philosophies of the coaches. They cannot be mor different.
    It reminds me of Goofus and Galant (from my days of reading Higlights in the doctor’s office)

    Goofues lofts threes
    Galant works the ball down low for an easier shot
    Goofus “takes what the defense gives them”
    Galant does what his team does best.
    Goofus runs the offense
    Galant finds mismatches and exploits them
    Goofus stays in a daytight compartment
    Galant lives for the big games
    Goofus tried to keep it low scoring and hoped to pull out a victory.
    Galant developed a potent offense

  3. CedarGroveWolf 03/13/2007 at 10:52 AM #

    “But that has nothing to do with the FACT that NC State under Coach Sidney Lowe overachieved, posted the first winning record against the Big 4 since 1988-89, and posted its highest shooting percentage since that same season.”

    never disagreed with that. just keeping it real & out of the clouds.

  4. Rochester 03/13/2007 at 10:53 AM #

    Considering the thin roster coming into the season, this is one year in which a soft non-conference schedule was excusable. If we had lined up tougher foes the results likely would not have been pretty (especially if the games had fallen after Atsur went down). I sort of remember we had a game against Seton Hall scheduled that we purged after they stole one of our recruits. That would have boosted the SOS.

    I have to believe we’ll beef things up a bit in the future. Even the ECU game, being on the road, will be worth something in RPI, though I’m not sure if SOS is calculated in a similar manner (bonus points for road games?).

    I can empathize in a way with the posters who have been burned too many times to wholeheartedly jump in and say they believe we’re back, but I can feel it this time. Sid is the man and we ARE back and I will be shocked if we don’t contend regularly for the ACC title in the very near future.

  5. kevirose 03/13/2007 at 10:55 AM #

    Question – how come there seems to be no info on here about Javi Gonzalez verbal. This kid seems to be a strong, typical PG… just what we need. I’ve seen some clips and he looks solid (but so did Fergie).

  6. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 11:06 AM #

    With SFN’s approval, I hope.

    I would like to know if people feel totally comfortable by continually comparing Lowe’s first year to that of Herb Sendek’s, just what does that say about the last decade, and how does it rank any higher than Les Robinson’s six year stint?

  7. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 11:09 AM #

    ^Forget that, there are many obvious plus’. That was poorly worded.

  8. choppack1 03/13/2007 at 11:11 AM #

    I didn’t have a problem w/ the soft schedule early. We responded well vs. Michigan and followed that up w/ a strong showing vs. UVa. The schedule of WVa, Cincy, Bama and Michigan is respectable when you throw in the other 16 conference games we have.

    I would definitely like to see us get a marquee non-conference opponent…Kansas, UCLA, Indiana, Kentucky, the ‘ville or IU. I’m sure w/ the face time (or jacket time) Sidney got – that is now more likely.

  9. Power Packed 03/13/2007 at 11:22 AM #

    I know exactly how this poor kid feels…an example of good parenting…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuGJzDGRdlM

  10. GAWolf 03/13/2007 at 11:26 AM #

    ^^^Hit him up, Beowolf.

  11. Power Packed 03/13/2007 at 11:31 AM #

    oops… sorry.

  12. McPete 03/13/2007 at 11:50 AM #

    Rick:
    dont forget

    Goofus ‘honors the process’
    Galant has no clue how that pertains to basketball.

  13. JimValvano 03/13/2007 at 11:58 AM #

    I want an update on recruiting and scholarships available for next year. We’ve got commitments from:

    PG Javier Gonzalez

    PF Tracy Smith

    C J.J. Hickson

    SF Johnny Thomas

    Not to mention that we’ll be getting PG Marques Johnson after Christmas. We’ll also get Degand onto the team, but I just keep hearing from some really legitimate people that Danny Green’s brother Rashad is coming too. Do we have enough scholarships to bring him in? Have ya’ll heard any rumors about anyone leaving the program through transfer or the NBA?

  14. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 12:07 PM #

    GAWolf, thanks pal.

    I feel it’s important point out that we’ll be in year TWO next season. I don’t know how that relates to pulling in big competition for the early OCC schedule for Sidney Lowe and staff in preparation. Also all of this negative talk about the easy OOC schedule, which seemed to be a plus, the easy ticket to the NCAAT, and just readily accepted up until right now.

  15. Tau837 03/13/2007 at 12:07 PM #

    Who on our team could go to the NBA? I love our players, but none of them should be thinking about that.

  16. Tau837 03/13/2007 at 12:08 PM #

    redfred, I don’t think easy OOC was easily accepted before now. I know I didn’t like it, whether or not we made the NCAA tournament.

  17. choppack1 03/13/2007 at 12:15 PM #

    JV – If Green is coming I wonder if he is walking on…Here’s why.

    If you look at our current roster/expected roster we’ve got several guards:
    Degand
    M. Johnson
    Gonzales

    (this doesn’t count Fells, Ferg or Thomas)

    Then for commits next year, we’ve got
    Mays
    CJ Williams – he may be more of a 3, but you see my point.

    I would think we’re looking down low for our next scolie, not another guard.

  18. GAWolf 03/13/2007 at 12:16 PM #

    Redfred, I was actually talking about Power Packed since he did the same thing I did on the other thread and I got “HA HA”‘d by Beowolf for being a numbskull. I thought what’s good for the goose… regardless it was a joke.

    Also Redfred… I think the easy OOC was accepted by the fans as an easy ticket to the NCAA in the past because we knew it to be our ONLY ticket to the tournament. We’d at best go about .600 in the conference which given an exceptionally high percentage OOC record provides an easy/given in to the tournament. The problem with that is our seed in the tournament typically reflected our schedule. The at best second round exit is almost unavoidable coming in as an 8 or lower.

    I think now the entire focus of the program has shifted from “we should be happy making the tournament” to “we want to win a conference and then national championship!” And truth be told, that’s exactly what the majority of us were screaming when Sendek tucked tail and ran. With that we’re going to get the good and the bad. I believe Sidney has mentioned before that he wants a more difficult OOC schedule with some big names to be included in that. Win or lose, I think those games are next step in the natural progression of getting this program back to where it belongs.

  19. GAWolf 03/13/2007 at 12:17 PM #

    On a completely unrelated side note: Anyone see where OJ Mayo got busted with weed?

  20. chilly water 03/13/2007 at 12:19 PM #

    serously^^^^ not surprised, alot of kids are into that pot, me included

  21. BJD95 03/13/2007 at 12:20 PM #

    Sid can count.

  22. GAWolf 03/13/2007 at 12:21 PM #

    Imagine that… coming from a Panic fan… I mean.

  23. VaWolf82 03/13/2007 at 12:21 PM #

    The other thing we learned in Tampa was that quality competition prepares you for quality competition. Our non-con schedule did us no favors against West Va, Cincy, and Alabama. We grew fat on easy prey.

    That sounds really good….but I don’t buy it. UVa played the easiest OOC schedule of any team in the top 2/3 of the conference and they tied for first in the regular season. Blame for losses and credit for wins belong to the coaches and the players…not past opponents. That was true when Sendek was here and it should still be true today.

    Something we learn every Selection Sunday is that non-con SOS matter. Not only by itself, but in how affects the RPI ranking

    Never heard that before. 😉

    http://www.statefansnation.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/27/ooc-strength-of-schedule/

  24. redfred2 03/13/2007 at 12:24 PM #

    Tau

    I’d love to play every team on those earlier list. But since some people can’t figure out who is responsible for what, or take circumstances into account before they start making comparisons, I’d almost rather take the usual win over Delaware St, then hear them whine about a loss to Kentucky.

  25. ShootingGuard 03/13/2007 at 12:24 PM #

    “When we start to win on a regular basis, the opposition will turn Sidney’s red jacket into Chuck’s red shoes. You heard it here first.”

    The key point about that is WIN.

    As Mr O and I discussed before, Sid laid it ALL on the line by coming out in that blazer vs clear favorite UNC. Had Sid lost in embarrassing fashion, people would have made fun of him as being a “big dumb tomato.” As it is, Sid was confident and skillful enough to put it all on the line and WIN, and, as such, the tomato reference becomes endearing instead as in “FEAR THE TOMATO!!” Most people love a winner, especially if the winner is humble and charismatic about it. (See Jimmy V…)

    The downfall for Amato was that he focused on the red shoes and the shades when he was LOSING, and, unfortunately, he wasn’t trying to be funny. He wasn’t humble when he won, so he was a very desireable and easy target when he lost. (Jimmy V was a comedian and a winner, and I know plenty of UNC fans who loved Jimmy V and feel that he was unfairly run out of town despite the fact that he beat their team in games that mattered…)

Leave a Reply