Preparing for Akron

Akron

We’ve been trying to get the gentleman at Section Six to consider coming over to StateFansNation. His stuff is just wonderful and fits EXACTLY what we do here. We shall not give up our quest!! 🙂

In the meantime, the work done at Section Six and Red & White from State continue to complement our work perfectly. So today, Section Six prepares us for Akron with no need for us to do much else on the topic other than turn your attention to some interesting Akron bits from Ohio.com:

Running Back Performance
At first glance, Dennis Kennedy’s rushing statistics against Penn State weren’t that impressive. He had 59 yards in the University of Akron’s 34-16 loss to Penn State last Saturday.

But Zips coach J.D. Brookhart said Kennedy’s play was noteworthy, considering the 5-foot-11, 200-pound sophomore went up against a physical and athletic defensive unit that had four players back from last year’s Big Ten championship team.

Brookhart was most pleased that Kennedy showed durability. He carried 25 times and had a few plays where he needed power and strength by turning several would-be tackles for losses into positive yardage.

“Dennis was our offensive player of the game,” Brookhart said. “He played extremely well. He was good on pass protection, ran the ball well, caught the ball and just made some things happen. Overall, Dennis played a great game.”

Kennedy originally signed a national letter of intent with Ohio State but never played for the Buckeyes. He ended up at UA before the 2004 season and sat out the year. Last year, he played behind Brett Biggs but took advantage of his limited playing time. In the spring, he solidified himself as the starter.

* Kicking Game – “Zips kicker Matt Domonkos and punter John Stec made their collegiate debuts against the Nittany Lions, and the results were mixed. Domonkos kicked a 46-yard field goal late in the second quarter but missed a point-after attempt in the third quarter.

“I thought Matt came in and stepped up,” Brookhart said. “For him to hit a 46-yarder in those conditions, right off the bat, was awesome. I think he got overly excited on the (PAT) and just tried to kill it. He’ll learn from that.”

Stec had seven punts for an average of 33.3 yards in rainy conditions.

“John had no trouble fielding the ball all camp, and he has very good hands,” Brookhart said. “You couple 107,000 fans, 18 years old, and a wet ball with a rush coming at you… he didn’t play well, but he responded after getting hit a couple times and just kept going out there. He will get better.”

* Injury report – Senior left tackle Tim Crouch injured an ankle against Penn State and missed practice Tuesday, but Brookhart expects him to start Saturday at North Carolina State. “We’re just trying to figure out if we want him to practice or whether resting him will be the best thing.”

* Updated Akron Preview from Pack Pride

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

'06 Football General

73 Responses to Preparing for Akron

  1. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 12:34 PM #

    tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc

    I don’t think wanting to see the QB being given an opportunity to fully play at his position is crying or gloom and doom at all.

    I think football, as we know it, started in the late 1800’s. It was somewhere around 50 later years before the foward pass became a legal part of the game. I think after 175 years, it’s pretty well accepted as standard equipment.

  2. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 12:42 PM #

    Stupid math blunder ^75 years.^ That blew up that smart a*s post and my credibilty for the day.

    See ya!

  3. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 09/07/2006 at 1:22 PM #

    Can’t people be happy after a win? Our team has lost once during our last 7 games and people moan and complain that we don’t have Rivers at QB. State very well may have ‘Ted’ Brown running the ball so I just don’t get the anger directed torwards the QB.

    I’m the first to bcht about State when we don’t win, I think the Arizona State coach is the devil, I think Amato is an awful coach but I don’t get the whinning when the team is winning. If the L’s start to pile up I’ll be a baby along with the others but can’t we enjoy victory. Is it in the power of State fans?

  4. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 2:11 PM #

    t-t-t

    I am happy for the win. A win is a win. But NCSU/ASU is not FSU/UM. If it were I would have already traded last Saturday’s win in for the Carolina game and the season would already be well on it’s way to success. That’s just like the Car Quest Bowl is not a BCS event.

    I’m may sound like I’m bitterly complaining but I am not bitter, not really complaining, just questioning one aspect.

    The way I see it, we’re probably not ready to make a serious run for the division or ACC title THIS YEAR. Hopefully, but either way I am OK with that this season. I will not go ballistic after almost any loss this season, except if it occurs against you know who. Do we need to improve in certain areas for later in the season and beyond? Yes. Do we want to go a bowl game this season? Yes.

    Those things are all fine and dandy. But if playing not to lose and so cautiously against OOC competition this season limits the overall ability to improve the program for farther on down the road, I am totally against it.

    I want Bowl games that carry some notarity. We can’t have that while freezing the most pivotal player’s ability to develop during a win over a non-conference opponent.

    It’s pay me now, or pay me later.

  5. Mike 09/07/2006 at 2:56 PM #

    Redfred, you and I have a lot in common including our posts back during the search to replace Herb with the Knight. Maybe one of these days people will understand we dont whine for the sake of whining (leave that to those at Orange County Community College) but we simply strive for the best.

    In fact, let’s bring back Herb, because all that matters is getting to the NCAA tournament, does not matter if we get past the 1st round, we made the tournament. I’m sorry, winning 7 games and going to the toilet bowl is not enough for me, I want to win every game. And passing for 36 yards, we can beat some teams, but we will not win games against good teams (and not knocking App here) and we will settle for another 7 win season and a trip to the Dow Scrubbing Bubbles Tidy Bowl.

  6. JO JO DYNAMO 09/07/2006 at 3:03 PM #

    In the new f-ball ACC there exists the distinct possiblility that a team can suffer three Conference losses (what with cross Divisional games, etc.) and still win their Division and the overall Championship as well, Florida State proved that last year, and I don’t think that will be the only time it happens. So, looking at N. C. STATE, one can perceive the same, given the uncertainty in the league at the QB position, for the PACK is not alone in that regard. Stone will either take off from where he left off or he will remain what he is, and if the latter is true then it may be enough for STATE to prevail in enough contests to be in the running for the title, so to speak, aided obviously by a very good Defense and a potent running attack. I am also just as confident that if Stone falters enough in a particular game, then the backup(s) will get their due chance(s), but that remains to be seen. Steve Logan’s advice would be well heeded this season, that being to always let your backup QB run a series in each game, he liked to do it in the 2nd. qtr., as painful as that sounds, so that if called on in a crucial moment, the backup would at least have some valid experience to fall back on, confidence wise.

  7. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 3:09 PM #

    ^”Mieneke Bowl” not “Car Quest”, I am a rookie on the senior’s moments tour. Sharp as a tack. Did I say attack, old lord, this is the big one Ethel, I’m coming to join you…

  8. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 3:10 PM #

    Wrong thread even!!! WTF!

  9. JO JO DYNAMO 09/07/2006 at 3:13 PM #

    There are the BCS Bowls which really matter for the ultimate claim to fame, and then there’s all the rest which are fine as a vacation stop and a recruiting tool but not much more.

  10. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 3:33 PM #

    It wasn’t the wrong thread after all….%^#@#$…..???

    I’m melting, melting….brain wise anyway.

    Mike

    Like many have said already, it’s all about what have you done for me lately? With the lately getting to be a real time event. I have more patience than that, not a another decade of it, it does have it’s limits, but I am looking way beyond App State or single bad day loss for the program.

    Kinda like when we agreed on a coach earlier in the year. Not all immediate plus’s in those thoughts either, but in the long run and for the future of Wolfpack Basketball, it would have been dyamite. It won’t quite as explosive at first, but I think maybe we may have stumbled upon the exact guy to replace our choice, he’s only about four or five years early.

  11. packpigskinfan23 09/07/2006 at 3:54 PM #

    the attitude of this board has increased much… =)

  12. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 09/07/2006 at 4:30 PM #

    I think you pick a starting QB and stick with him until you need to replace him with your new starter. I’ve never seen anything good come from putting guys in, trying two starters, not announcing a starter. Coach needs to pick who is his leader on the field and stick with him until he has lost the team’s respect. I think this has hurt UNC over the last few years. I’m confused when I see great coaches like a Parcells not naming a starter. He can always correct his choice he feels like he made a mistake but the confusion a head coach looks bad.

    I’m sure some people with better sports memory than I can name teams that have done well with no clear starter at QB. I would really love an example of a great team or a championship (any) team that didn’t have a true starter behind Center.

  13. class of 74 09/07/2006 at 4:37 PM #

    1972 – 1973 NCSU Dave Buckey/ Bruce Shaw. Shaw could throw and Buckey ran a decent option play. They alternated all season. Lou’s first year in Raleigh.

  14. Wolfpack4ever 09/07/2006 at 5:10 PM #

    Monday Morning Quarterback

    By Matt Zemek
    CollegeFootballNews.com
    Posted Sep 5, 2006

    Last paragraph:

    “Finally, a word in defense of all offensive coordinators in week one of a football season. Without the benefit of a preseason game, and taking into account the youthfulness of the players involved, it makes more and more sense–with each passing year–why coordinators keep game plans so simple, and passing games so horizontal, in season openers. Young quarterbacks–even those returning for a second season–need simplicity in early-season games in order to thrive. The game has to slow down for a quarterback, and a conceptually simple game plan allows that to happen, at least to some extent. In the volatile world of early-season September football–which is a very different animal from October and November conference play–merely weeding out mistakes and turnovers usually proves to be the difference (whereas in October and November, you need to make more big plays instead of merely avoiding the bad stuff). As a result, coordinators need to put their QBs in situations where they can be effective and ball-secure at the same time. Look at USC. The Trojans and co-coordinators Lane Kiffin and Steve Sarkisian gave John David Booty a very manageable game plan. Booty didn’t throw vertically, but he didn’t need to, either. This USC offense–with a new quarterback playing his very first game in a loud SEC stadium–was a lot like the offense that didn’t blow the doors off the joint, but which was very effective, in a 23-0 Trojan in at Auburn in 2003. That game proved to be a nice, solid, confidence-building springboard for a kid named Matt Leinart. Seems that Booty had very much the same kind of start. Simplicity has been golden for USC quarterbacks in career-opening games in SEC stadiums. Proof that a game-one game plan should not try to overthink or overextend.”

    Stone’s 39 yards passing is in no way indicative of his passing ability. He may not have strong passing skills but Saturdays game is not an indication of that. Had Stone thrown 25 or 30 passes and completed 8 or 10 with 2 or 3 INTs, I would be fighting for admission in the Doom and Gloom club.

    redfred2 and others: I forget who said it, could have been Valvano and to whom I “dis-remember” as well, but some coach turned to an assistant and said during a critical time in the game, “Think a good thought!”

    My last comment to SFNers on our football team until after 4PM Saturday is: “Think a good thought!”

  15. colapack 09/07/2006 at 5:38 PM #

    If you’re honest about the schedule, we will win 6 games. I am pulling for 7. I think 7 wins will be a success for this particular team. If we get 6 wins early, I will start to get excited. However the wins come, they are going to be hard fought because they will be won with defense and the running game. The passing game will be by necessity but it is not going to win games for us. The season will resemble the bowl game last season. No frills. The season is not going to have a high entertainment value like it did during the Rivers/Holt eras.

    Watching Holt catch the ball was always entertaining because of the yards after. And of course Rivers was fun to watch from day one.

  16. class of 74 09/07/2006 at 5:41 PM #

    Booty did not start six games last year as did Stone! Apples and oranges comparison at best. I’m not the president of the doom and gloom club just a realistic observer. Right now we can hope he develops and maybe we have a winning season but if he can not keep defenses honest with some passing threat it will be a long season for our offense.

  17. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 09/07/2006 at 5:56 PM #

    …but if he can not keep defenses honest with some passing threat it will be a long season for our offense.

    …if ‘global warming’ causes season openers to be played in 120 degree temperatures it will be a long season opener. Any other mind creations to assume the negative.

  18. redfred2 09/07/2006 at 6:08 PM #

    tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc

    Dueling QB’s in mid season is not a good thing. Just some valuable game time experience for another up and comer when the game allows.

    It’s always a little easier stepping in later than being the total focus at the frenzied opening of a game. It’s an advantage that can make a 2nd stringer look better than if it were the other way around.

  19. Mike 09/07/2006 at 9:35 PM #

    Dueling QB’s is never a good idea, horrible idea. Getting a 2nd stringer experience is a great idea. Difference between dueling and giving some PT.

  20. primacyone 09/07/2006 at 10:58 PM #

    http://northcarolinastate.scout.com/2/565742.html

    Related comments on the topic. Our coaches really do know more than us. Really, they do.

  21. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 09/08/2006 at 12:38 PM #

    Getting the 2nd stringer some time can be good but it also can be awful. You put in a back-up he lobs a couple 30 yard passes and a couple of TDs and everyone suddenly wants him to start. I would only play a #2 in the event of an injury or a blowout.

    Dueling QB’s isn’t a good thing not only in mid-season but in the summer. These coaches are paid pretty well to make decisions and when they don’t it usually hurts the team. If you want to look at two guys then do that in the spring make a choice and stick with it.

  22. redfred2 09/08/2006 at 1:10 PM #

    t-t-t

    That is a definite consequence in any of the skills and high profile positions, the QB is just the number one on everyone’s radar screen. But the game day experience has got to be given. Some kids who absolutely light it up every day in practice can’t handle and don’t show up when game day rolls around.

    “then do that in the spring make a choice and stick with it.”

    Hmmm…Jay Davis…last season maybe???

    Last year’s results would look like…???

    We’d have an inexperienced play caller with possibly (???) a 1-0 record in his junior season and even more unanswered questions???

    Sorry, I can’t agree with your reasoning.

  23. redfred2 09/08/2006 at 1:13 PM #

    t-t-t

    I also meant to say that there are players who don’t show up much at practice, but burn it up when they’re put in front of a crowd.

Leave a Reply