Evans Rekindles My Fleeting Interest

BC Game

Boston College travels to NC State on Saturday night for the Wolfpack’s ACC opener (that will be televised on ESPN2). I am officially putting the world “on notice” that this game represents the POTENTIAL end of my interest in football this season and as a watershed moment in my well-documented “let’s wait and see” attitude related to Chuck Amato.

In fact, Chuck the Chest has ALREADY managed to ‘pull me back in’ for one final chance with his announcement that Daniel Evans will start at quarterback for the Pack against Boston College.

I had decided NOT to attend Carter-Finley on Saturday night before the announcement that Daniel Evans was going to start at quarterback this week. Selfishly, allow me to ask – ‘Why should I go to the game?’

The game is scheduled to be televised. The hassle of packing a seven month old child to drive to Raleigh…to spend more money on a hotel…to only have limited time tailgating with friends…to wake up early on Sunday (with an obvious hangover) and drive home is simply NOT offset by the “value” derived by watching one of the worst offenses in NC State history…a week after the team completely gave-up in a game… and reverted to their historical ways of playing stupid.

The redundancy of the broken record of NC State football has worn thin on most fans, including me. During the end of the Mike O’Cain era when State was losing games to top teams by scores of 62-3 and 77-17 and was losing miserable affairs to bad teams (Baylor, Duke, Wake Forest and Purdue) I based some conclusions on the belief that, “losing games is one thing; the manner in which we were losing games tells a greater story.”

In 2006, such a statement is becoming relevant again – both in the margin of scores and in the manner in which the Wolfpack is losing.

* In Chuck Amato’s first four seasons in Raleigh, NC State lost three football games by more than ten points.

* In Chuck Amato’s last two years (and three games), NC State has four football games by more than ten points.

The mindless play.

The stupid penalties.

The turnovers.

The mindset of players more concerned with celebrating and jawing than executing on the football field.

The offense that is either (a) racking up tons of yards but failing to score points or (b) racking up tons of yawns and failing to score points.

The recent losses to clearly inferior programs like Wake Forest, Akron & Southern Miss.

The winning percentage against our “peer group” of – Clemson, Maryland, Boston College, Georgia Tech, UNC-CH & Virginia.

The winning percentage in newly renovated Carter-Finley since 2003 season.

Despite all of the tactical benefits that Caulton Tudor shared regarding Daniel Evans, I truly believe that the PRIMARY benefit of the move has been to keep most of the fans around for one more game. One more last chance. One more effort.

The good news here is that BC’s run defense (entire defense) ranks as one of the worst in the country. If there was ever a game for Daniel to potentially have the pressure alleviated because of a great running attack, then this one would be it.

Hopefully, it is a recipe for great execution and a new leaf in our recent tubulent chapters on the gridiron. I know that it has rekindled my interest for another week.

'06 Football Chuck Amato General

30 Responses to Evans Rekindles My Fleeting Interest

  1. Wolfpack4ever 09/23/2006 at 5:42 PM #

    class of 74, I’ve read some of your other posts so I am just going to assume that what sounds like approval of booing your own team because it is not playing up to its potential is what you are saying.

    I was driving during the Carolina game today and wanted to keep up with what was happening in Death Valley, so I had on a sports talk show. The discussion centered on the Big Ten and the atmosphere or lack of it at certain games. One guy was arguing that atmosphere made no difference while the other pointed out that players wanted to play and coaches wanted to coach in a great atmosphere.

    I thought about Carter-Finley with its booing the coach and players and fans leaving in droves when the team is losing. What kind of atmosphere do we present to recruits and possible coaches.

    Which comes first the chicken or the egg? Great Coaches and outstanding athletes winning games or great atmosphere that lures great caoches and outstanding athletes?

    Great atmosphere (fans) may not bring great coaches and athletes but crappy atmosphere keeps them away. I can hear rival recruiters now, “Son, do you want to go to a place where they boo you when you lose or to a place where the fans are behind you win or losel” OK, I’m wrong. Rival recruiters would never do a thing like that.

    Our situation here at NCSU is not ideal. When suggestions that fans get off the players and coaches backs and support our team are greeted with justifications for booing and walking out, I fear we are doomed to mediocrity. We have been booing and walking out for years. How’s that working for us?

  2. Woof Wolf 09/23/2006 at 6:31 PM #

    And the recruit said, “I don’t want to go where it’s acceptable to be a loser.”

  3. redfred2 09/23/2006 at 7:10 PM #

    Give and take, give and take.

    Give me some hint of something tangible upon which I can build an optimistic outlook for the future, and I’ll follow any NC State athletic program like a loyal little puppy from here to eternity. Will, and have, anyway.

    Is anyone out there advocating booing the team or has anybody mentioned even booing the team on this thread. I haven’t, never have, never would. Anybody else out there pushing that agenda???

    I didn’t think so.

  4. drhammondo 09/23/2006 at 9:32 PM #

    In Chuck’s interview before the half, he said he didn’t use a timeout because they have a “good passer” and he didn’t want to “give him anymore at bats”. IT WAS FOURTH AND SEVEN!!! He didn’t have anymore “at bats”, as they were about to punt the ball. Just another example of Chuck mismanaging the game!

  5. legacyman 10/11/2006 at 7:11 PM #

    I have read many interesting views prior to my post and most have some valid points but to not go to our games is a personal decision. I go regardless of wins and losses although I have left early in bad losses. I totally support Chuck and feel that he is forming a strong basis for our football program…sure he has had an unstable staff of assistants and that has led to mistakes on the field but it appears that he has the folks he wants now.

    If some of the younger posters had followed NC State football as long as I have then they would appreciate what we now have (of course, not enough Ws for most of us, yet). Chuck has been the catalyst for the unimaginable changes we have seen in Carter-Finley…it is now a breath-taking place when the night is dark, the air is crisp, the fans are energized and a high profile opponent is on our field.

    Keep the faith folks, we are improving.

Leave a Reply