NC State’s secondary needs to improve, or else

The defensive secondary was just one of the major issues the Wolfpack defense had in 2009. Without major improvement before the season opener September 4, it could be the issue in 2010. Aside from the issues facing Jarvis Byrd, the secondary is simply unproven. Even with less experience on the defensive line, the front seven of the defense could very well be better in 2010. If NC State wants to have the success its capable of, the secondary better come along.

The ACC Sports Journal has been reviewing the spring workout for every team in the conference and putting together thoughts for fans letting everyone know what to expect come August. Andrew Jones’ article on NC State is one of those very well-written pieces.

Spring Football Review: NC State

The annual theme for N.C. State’s spring football practice is “Back to Basics,” which made a heck of a lot of sense this time around.

Nowhere was that the case more than in the defensive secondary, where the Wolfpack returns a pair of starters from a unit that was discombobulated and ineffective last fall, and where all eight players on the depth chart were either freshmen or sophomores.

Spring games offer only so much definitive evidence, but at times they can be quite revealing. The Red and White units in State’s spring game surrendered 644 yards to quarterbacks Mike Glennon and Daniel Imhoff. Most came in the first half, when there was no running clock. It would have been worse, otherwise.

Returning secondary starter C.J. Wilson said the group’s performance “wasn’t indicative of how we progressed this spring.”

Wolfpack coach Tom O’Brien, though, somewhat disagreed.

'10 Football ACC & Other College Football

30 Responses to NC State’s secondary needs to improve, or else

  1. BJD95 05/26/2010 at 10:03 PM #

    Actually, I’m going to hold off until tomorrow afternoon to post, since it looks like we might just have a happy post-game write-up on tonight’s baseball action.

    But yes – everyone’s on the right track here. And seriously, what do we possibly have to lose?

  2. Packfan28 05/26/2010 at 10:27 PM #

    Well, we’ve seen what Russell Wilson can do when he has three downs. Imagine what he would be capable of with four downs. I vote yes.

  3. tjfoose1 05/26/2010 at 11:13 PM #

    The “No kick” philosophy of Pulaski Academy would certainly get us a lot of national pub, and think of what it could do for recruiting offensive players!

    Like the opposing player said in the SI article I linked to above,

    “I wish we played like y’all.”

    It would be fun… but if nothing else, it certainly would make our woeful punt and kick coverage teams moot.

    Somebody send TOB a note.

  4. Alpha Wolf 05/27/2010 at 8:51 AM #

    ^ You forget that TOB was “fired” from BC for not being “fun.”

  5. choppack1 05/27/2010 at 12:07 PM #

    Personally, I think we’ve run into a multi-pronged problem here.

    First off – one of TOB’s most valuable assistants didn’t follow to Raleigh. That assistant of course is Spaziano. To say his “replacement” has struggled is a bit of an understatement.

    Secondly – I think TOB has struggled to make the transition from recruiting the tough Catholic-school kids of the NE/Ohio area to recruiting kids from South.

    Thirdly – it took TOB a long time to get the results he was getting at BC. While he had some decent records early in his tenure – he was playing in a mediocre BE.

    Look at his 1st winning year – BC beat Baylor, Navy, Rutgers, and NorthEastern friggin lost to friggin Temple, they did beat Pitt, the Cuse, ND and WV that year…but got absolutely throttled vs. Colorado in their bowl game.

    The next year they had 7 wins…they included Army, Navy, UConn, Rutgers, and Temple.

    His 2001 8 win seasons included wins vs. Army, Navy, Temple and Rutgers.

    Quite frankly – we haven’t had 4 horrid teams like this on our schedule each year. If we did, our record might be a good bit better.

    And the funny thing is – last year was the only season we didn’t make progress towards being a solid football team. The “good feelings” are colored by the fact that last year we took a huge step back and we lost our bowl game before that.

    I think the staff realizes what’s at stake here. I thought last year we played it way to close to the vest vs. South Carolina to open the season…I don’t know if you’ll see as much cautiousness this year. I think the staff is operating under the opinion that if we don’t go bowling in 2010 it’s over for them here.

Leave a Reply