DeCourcy defends common sense

Tracy Smith’s suspension for tonights big game at Arizona is drawing commentary from national personalities.

Yesterday, Sporting News’ Mike DeCourcy chimed in with some thoughts about the league’s policy. The key descriptive term here is — ‘absurd’.

State your case

It’s not a First Amendment issue; it’s a common sense issue: No way should N.C. State’s Tracy Smith be suspended for criticizing the officiating following Sunday’s loss to Wake Forest.

Smith told the assembled media the refs called too many touch fouls and “favored Wake Forest all the way.” A suspension for such comments—he’ll miss State’s game Wednesday against Arizona—is absurd.

Smith did not question the officials’ integrity, only their competence. A league policy that insists refs should be above such comments is without merit.

I appreciate the comments and the attention that Smith’s comments are drawing to the abomination that is also known as ACC Officiating. (See this blog entry) However, suffering long time Wolfpackers are scratching our collective heads about this particular spat as we have all witnessed significantly worse officiating, and game changing calls, throughout our lifetime. It is odd to me that this ‘status quo’ officiated event was the game that drew ire and comments from an NC State player.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

09-10 Basketball College Basketball

28 Responses to DeCourcy defends common sense

  1. Wulfpack 12/23/2009 at 6:10 PM #

    ^I tend to agree. Let’s all pick on lowly NC State. They don’t care, they will even acquiesce.

    It’s really a no-win situation for Sid, though. I hope we can win tonight so it becomes a moot point. A loss really hurts us.

  2. fullmoon1 12/23/2009 at 7:29 PM #

    I do not think simple criticism of refs reflects poorly on a player or a team, coach or university. I think overlooking and ignoring the lack of objectivity is worse. Someone earlier pointed out that a Wakw player didn’t belly ache but I bet teh said wake player did the second he was whistled for the fouls. Wake really woulnd’t have reason to belly ache as they clearly benefited from the disparrigaing difference. I think the leagues stance on criticism reflects poorly on the league.

  3. highstick 12/23/2009 at 7:42 PM #

    Until Roy and K are held to a higher standard, why should our coaches, AD’s, etc. decide that we should be? Please explain?

    F Bomb’s at an official should result in an ejection! I guess Roy would have had the official removed from the building for calling fouls!

Leave a Reply