The Day After (Updated 9:40am)

Huge day yesterday. statusquOblinger’s resignation became SFN’s fourth most viewed story of the entire month in a single day. The worst thing about the yesterday’s traffic to the site is that WV Wolf’s fantastic “State of Football” piece got a little overshadowed.

As usual, our community shared some fantastic comments that are much appreciated.

Charlotte Obs headline Oblinger

Link to lead story in Raleigh & Charlotte Observers.

Correct me if I am interpreting this incorrectly – but am I analyzing this correctly that Oblinger gets a six month PAID vacation at his current high salary rate and then gets to return to the University at a lower rate – but still one that most people would love to have – for the responsibility of teaching one class per semester?

He gets to return to the University where he can then play roles on the Faculty Senate and influence decisions with a faculty which STILL has not publicly censured him after they censured and ran off the likes of Chancellor Fox, Jim Valvano, and others for what far less transgressions? (Could you imagine if Valvano had ever been caught lying and had NOT been cleared of any wrong doing after six diffferent agencies and organizations investigated his program?)

I am obviously not the only person who thinks this way. The following is gleaned from a comment yesterday by ‘sweet jumper’:

I find it ironic that V was forced to resign by the “holier than thou” administration over rumors and heresay, and the NCAA found no evidence of activity to warrant probation. Now the corruptness of the administration is coming to light and the trail leads all the way to the governor’s office. The dominoes are falling and it sounds like the FBI is going to find a lot more wrongdoing in academia than the NCAA discovered in hoops 20 years ago.

I cannot help but support the thoughts of a poster named ‘weejuns’ on Pack Pride’s message boards when he says:

The Alumni Association ought to take a firm stand against this mess and call for the firing of Nielson and Oblinger with no tenure benefits. The likelihood that tenure will be stripped is remote, but the public stand ought to be taken that it is not OK with NC State Alumni that such actions are ok. Being silent in this case is the equivalence of condoning it.

Let me tell you what is REALLY going on here – GREED and GAMING the system.

You see, retirement benefits of state government jobs are set differently than the benefits that those of us in the real world have. For example, an employee’s annual pension is set on a formula based on a certain number of years of that employee’s highest pay.

For example, when a state employee retires they get an annual payment of some percentage of their four highest years of compensation. It is NOT the last four years of service or some kind of average of the entirety of service. So, it is in the self interest of these cronies to be able to bring in as much compensation as they can for a certain amount of years at any point in their career. This is one of the reasons that the world of academia is one of the only industries where former leaders can/will remain employed in lesser roles with lesser compensation. They can ride off and build more ‘years of service’ for other various retirement benefits while sitting idly by with tenure and in a world of no demands.

So, when all of these folks – Oblinger, Nielsen, Easley – are angling for more and more money, even for short amounts of time, the impact of that compensation is not only felt by the taxpayers today but also translates into higher retirement benefits for every year of their life after retirement. Courtesy of the North Carolina tax payer.

Link to “NC State feels leadership vacuum”. Obviously I don’t argue the premise – except for the Marye Ann Fox years, NC State has felt a leadership vaccuum since the 1980s.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

NC State Administration

79 Responses to The Day After (Updated 9:40am)

  1. GAWolf 06/10/2009 at 12:35 PM #

    61packer: I would guess that 98% of the people who frequent this blog vote religiously. For whatever that’s worth to you…

  2. Noah 06/10/2009 at 12:52 PM #

    Noah: So despite your support for the ultimate move to cut ties with V, you wish the school never opted to “go down that road” in the first place?

    A competent administration would never have allowed it to get so far out of hand. They never would have hired someone like Jim Valvano to be the AD. Valvano would have had a much clearer picture of what who he could recruit and who he couldn’t. And so on and so on and so on.

    I don’t think Valvano was a bad guy. I think he had many wonderful qualities. I just think he needed a strong administrator ahead of him.

    But once we put him out there to do whatever he wanted…it was inevitable that things would spiral out of control. And it’s important to remember that while we ultimately went on probation for shoes and tickets, that wasn’t the ONLY thing going on. Anyone who doesn’t think that there were points shaved is lying to themselves.

    (and if you are one of those people, I’d love to hear your explanation for Ralph Kitley’s 26 point outburst on senior day in 1989.)

  3. GAWolf 06/10/2009 at 12:57 PM #

    Wow. Thanks for the clarification. That’s certainly adequate to answer my questions…. and some.

  4. graywolf 06/10/2009 at 9:29 PM #

    A good cleansing is needed every now and then. This one is long overdue and I fear that there is still dirt left to be washed away. I love NC State and agree with many posters that this process has been needed for some time and my hope for the athletics and academics is that we return to our rightful place as a great land grant institution.

Leave a Reply