NCAA Considering Draconian Celebration Rule for CFB

Something worth mentioning and keeping in mind:

Taunting of Scoring Plays Might Wipe Out Touchdowns

The NCAA rules committee is considering disallowing a touchdown if a player is flagged for taunting during a scoring play.

Citing an increasing concern over unsportsmanlike conduct, rules committee chairman Mike Bellotti said Wednesday that his group is considering “a major change” to the taunting rules.

Currently, “taunting, baiting or ridiculing an opponent verbally” is considered a dead-ball foul. Penalty yardage is assessed on the next kickoff. If the rule is changed, penalty yardage would be marked off from the spot of the foul and the touchdown would be nullified.

Simply explained: Think of an offensive player, headed toward the end zone, turning to show a defender the ball in a taunting manner before he crosses the goal line. That play would be considered a live-ball foul.

“It would be treated like a clip, for example,” said Rogers Redding, NCAA secretary-rules editor.

That would make the NCAA’s already-silly rules even worse and leave game-changing penalties in the subjective opinoin of referees.  These are young men we are talking about here, and scoring a touchdown, especially in critical game situations, is a big deal to them — and one where emotions might get the better of them.

Imagine a scenario where a team scores a last-second TD and wins the game, with players collapsing in a pile of joyous celebration.  “Not so fast,” the referee thinks, and tosses out a flag that calls the TD back and turns a victory into a loss.  The catch John Dunlap made against BC a few years ago in Carter-Finley comes to mind.  There certainly was a lot of rambunctious celebration afterward.  If an ACC referee decided that State’s players had been giving BC “the business” then that win turns into a loss.

Good thing that Tom O’Brien demands discipline from his players.  This new rule could really hurt a looser bunch. 2010 Daytona 500

Headscratchers NCS Football

32 Responses to NCAA Considering Draconian Celebration Rule for CFB

  1. bradleyb123 02/14/2009 at 12:00 PM #

    “Imagine a scenario where a team scores a last-second TD and wins the game, with players collapsing in a pile of joyous celebration. “Not so fast,” the referee thinks, and tosses out a flag that calls the TD back and turns a victory into a loss.”

    I didn’t read it that way. It’s a live ball foul. If a player has not yet crossed the goal line and points at the defender chasing him, it would be a spot foul right there. But if he scores, the play is over. If he THEN taunts, it wouldn’t take away the score.

    That’s the way I read it. Read the part about the “Gator Stomp” in that article.

  2. PackerInRussia 02/14/2009 at 12:20 PM #

    I don’t remember which game, but the refs made a call that put it all in perspective for me. There was a roughing the passer call against the other team (which I always cringe at considering that RW had been hurt earlier in the season in a game which saw many RTPs go uncalled) which was offset because State was flagged for excessive celebration (or something like that) on a touchdown. When celebrating is just as bad as a late hit on the QB I have a big problem with that. Hurting someone’s feelings should not be on the same level as hurting someone physically (illegally) and seeing them injured. Now it sounds like hurting someone’s feelings is a worse offense than any type of unnecessary roughness. Good ol’ America. Always have our priorities straight. Soon, teams will have to apologize for scoring and possibly making the other team feel bad.

  3. PackerInRussia 02/14/2009 at 12:26 PM #

    I like Hank’s suggestion. I don’t think that certain forms of taunting should be allowed. I think there is such a thing as excess. However, it would be better to handle it off the field similar to fines in the NFL. I think flags should be limited to things that affect the game to make something unfair due to breaking a rule or put someone in danger (such as roughing the passer). Other stuff such as taunting should be handled off the field after it has been reviewed. That way, hopefully, it will make it less subjective and make it more fairly called across the board.

  4. Noah 02/14/2009 at 3:17 PM #

    Stop putting the celebrations on television and you’ll put an end to the celebrating itself.. When someone scores, put the camera on the cheerleaders or the crowd.

  5. packplantpath 02/15/2009 at 9:01 AM #

    Crap Noah, I can hear the announcers now.

    “NC State cheerleaders celebrating after game winning touchdown cost NC State another 7 points”

  6. packalum44 02/15/2009 at 2:31 PM #

    Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to always know the difference.

    You can’t separate emotions from sports. To attempt to do so would be unwise. Or just friggin stupid.

  7. Wolf74 02/16/2009 at 7:28 AM #

    This is stupid. The refs can hardly enforce the rules they have, uniformly. Like HOLDING!

    Why not do something like eject the Head Coach if one of his players gets called for taunting. That way he will be forced to deal with the situation and get control of his players or he could start watching the games on TV – from HOME!

    The refs are already able to impact games by their call or nocalls. Now we give them a way to take points off the board – subjectively! NO!

Leave a Reply