Dan Werner takes center stage

In our preview article focused on NC State’s HUGE trip to Gainesville today we opened the topic of Dan Werner.  Instead of dominating that entry we thought that we would follow-up with more insight on the topic in this entry. Similarly, please try to keep the conversations here focused on this topic and don’t dominate the comments section of this entry with ‘game-talk’.

(Photo courtesy of Scout.com)

 

State fans will recall that starting Florida forward Dan Werner was originally committed to play for NC State but backed out when Herb Sendek resigned to take the Arizona State job.  We said the following about Werner at the time:

Dan Werner – Looks like an Evtimov clone. He has a great basketball body and decent athletic ability. He has vey good shooting form and is an excellent passer. He will contribute immediately.

Werner would have probably started for the Wolfpack in his freshman year – Coach Lowe’s first season.  In hindsight, his presence on that squad may have been the difference in an NCAA Tournament bid for the Wolfpack who had to battle through the season with only five to six serviceable players and whose ability to shoot from the perimeter was significantly impacted by an injury to Ilian Evtimov.

Werner is having a strong season this year, so make no mistake that in typical NC State fashion he will probably drop fifty points on the Wolfpack today and set an NCAA record for consecutive three pointers.

The N&O/Charlotte Observer featured an article on Werner’s impact to the NC State program that can be seen by clicking here.

Although the article is interesting and definitely relevant, I take a little issue with some detail (not) included in the presentation. 

The article – and the related callout box – lumps point guard Chris Wright into the list of ‘players NC State lost after losing Herb Sendek without identifying/discussing a very key distinction – Wright was in the recruiting class AFTER Werner & Larry Davis and his commitment to NC State was therefore nothing more than a non-binding verbal commitment.

Werner and Davis had actually signed binding letters of intent to play at NC State and were therefore required to get NC State’s permission to be released from their commitment to attend other schools.  Although the Observers article appropriately touches on the topic, there is more to the how the story unfolded than is discussed in today’s newspaper.

Although N.C. State could have demanded they honor their scholarship agreements, school officials agreed there was no sense forcing them to enroll if they didn’t want to come.

"We were not happy that we couldn’t keep them here," Lowe said. "My thing was to make sure those young men were happy with their decisions, and we let them go where they wanted to go."

Werner said Friday that he committed to N.C. State in part because he liked Sendek’s coaching staff and system, and he fit in with the Wolfpack players. He was disappointed that it took N.C. State more than a month to name a new coach after Sendek left.

Although Werner liked Lowe after meeting him, the fact that Lowe had coached exclusively in the NBA concerned Werner.

"There were just a lot of unknowns," Werner said. "I wasn’t comfortable and my parents weren’t comfortable with a coach who didn’t have college experience."

The real story behind what is now public record with today’s article is that by the time Sidney Lowe was hired at NC State there was no way to save Larry Davis and Dan Werner.  Whether appropriate, ethical, or within NCAA rules – these kids had already moved on and just needed the formality of Lowe’s hiring to go through the motions to secure their release.

The unfortunate part of the situation is that it didn’t necessarily have to be that way; you can thank good ole Lee Fowler and the NC State way of laziness, self-loathing and conciliation for the helping push these kids right out of the door. 

In a follow-up to the issues surrounding Larry Davis, SFN shared the following with you in April of last season: ———————————————————-

What we didn’t share with you at the time was the scoop on how Lee Fowler was handling our three committed and signed recruits – Larry Davis, Dan Werner and Dennis Horner – during his embarrassing coaching search. You see, during the month long search process when these recruits were reading tons of negative stories about Lee Fowler’s failures in the press…"Coach" Fowler’s communication with the recruits and their families was extremely limited. In other words, it barely existed.

After all of the dust settled, some people close to the situation informed SFN that the recruits’ families were very disappointed with the manner in which the transition was executed and that Lee Fowler and NC State had almost no communication with the families for the entire month of April. (We heard a rumor that Fowler spoke to the families one time – right after Sendek left – and never reached out to the families again. We do not have verification of this.)

Of course, this doesn’t surprise us – as we shared back then, Fowler wasn’t even calling the coaches that he was trying to hire in attempts to build relationships and sell what NC State had to offer. If he wasn’t calling/selling the coaches that he was trying to hire then he sure as hell wasn’t going to interrupt his Lake time by bothering with the recruits. You know how it goes…this stuff just works itself out. There is no reason for anyone to think strategically and spend time executing on a transition plan.  There is certainly no reason to promote the virtues of NC State and make our experience appear appealing to recruits – that’s the coaches job!

When it became known that Davis was not going to play for the Wolfpack we logged this entry that will be of interest to you. In the entry we discuss our thoughts on the general practice of being so passive and conciliatory with scholarship releases during a key time in NC State’s Basketball program.

Let’s assume for a moment that you work in the real world and own a company that is your livelihood.

One of your account officers makes a key sale for the company. In the sale the new client signs a contract committing the client to provide certain services for the next four years. You are restricted by law to having less than fifteen clients at any one time, so the commitment of the new client is very important.

After the new sale is signed, sealed and delivered and you have begun making arrangements and planning around the new client, the account officer who signed the deal accepts leaves your company to accept a new job with a competitor.

The new client, who signed his/her contract with YOUR COMPANY – not the account officer – suddenly claims that they are uneasy with their agreement and would like to take their business elsewhere.

Question: As a prudent manager of your business, do you allow the new client to freely ignore his commitment and simply waltz into the horizon without exercising any of the penalty clauses availability to you in the signed contract?

Had Lee Fowler and NC State not handled the Davis (and Dan Werner) situation in his typical lazy, non-confrontational, passive manner then Davis very easily would have been suiting up for NC State’s over last two years.

Though Davis has not excelled at Seton Hall, he has not been a total bust. With this said, Davis would have been on the roster last year when Engin Atsur was injured and would certainly have executed the point guard position with more success than Gavin Grant. Had NC State had a point guard throughout last season the Wolfpack may have won a couple of more games which may have produced bubble scenario for an NCAA Tournament berth.

One thing we do know for certain – Larry Davis is better than Marques Johnson. Had Davis been on the roster last season, the Wolfpack would have been significantly more hesitant to accept a transfer from a similar combo guard in Marques Johnson…and if Davis was excelling under our system one could also speculate that Javi Gonzalez may not have gotten an offer. This would have freed-up two valuable scholarships for Coach Lowe to have used during last year’s recruiting cycle to have allowed him to capitalize on the positive buzz and late season success of his first year.

In the end, no one still knows if Larry Davis would have been a good fit at NC State. As you will see in this entry, bridges got burned pretty quickly in the process. Which, of course, opens a whole new perspective into the ‘reasoning’ why NC State would be so conciliatory in a situation where we were being publically ridiculed despite our excessive support of the whims of an 18 year old who was unethically contacted by the program he attended only because of our generous release.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

08-09 Basketball AD & Department Basketball Recruiting General NC State Administration

27 Responses to Dan Werner takes center stage

  1. 61Packer 01/03/2009 at 11:08 AM #

    I like Werner’s shirt. Did he get it from Herb?

  2. Alpha Wolf 01/03/2009 at 11:14 AM #

    Hammer, nail, head. BAM.

    Fowler was probably busy in his secret bunker concentrating on his short game and his Texas Rigs instead of staying in touch with valuable recruits.

    One thing though, didn’t we have someone in the basketball office running what was left of the show at the time? I forget who it was, but I would swear we had one assistant who should have been on top of things…and Fowler should have been on top of the goings-on in that office.

    Bottom line is that Fowler quite frankly neglected his duties and his lack of action beyond the incompetence of the basketball coaching search (remember the Beilein buyout?) did a lot to put Lowe in a bad position from the moment he was hired.

    Yet our university’s leadership awards him for a job well done.

    How NC State is THAT?

  3. Jeff 01/03/2009 at 11:17 AM #

    ^ Chancellor’s award for EXCELLENCE!

    “EXCELLENCE” in the year as one of the WORST Athletics programs in all of the major conferences – #53 of 66 in BCS conferences.

    and during a tenure of compiling fewer ACC Titles than in any 8 year history of NC State Athletics.

    EXCELLENCE?!?!

    Only at NC State.

  4. packalum44 01/03/2009 at 11:29 AM #

    I don’t think K-State released their players when Huggins left (Beasley)

    The N&O certainly did not go into any sort of depth and give readers much insight such as this article.

    Regarding Lowe…I have criticized him for his coaching, although I refrained judgment until his 3rd season…contradicting myself, I could easily watch a Duke game and criticize K for his coaching when his team loses by 2 points. Concerning recruiting, it takes years to build relationships with players in high school and Lowe started from scratch (mentioned in the article).

    I think Lowe is a great recruiter and will get better when we start winning. I hope I don’t sound delusional but imagine 2012…

    5…unkown
    4…Howell
    3…CJ Leslie
    2…Brown/Woods/CJ Williams
    1…Harrow/Mays

    If we get some bigs and are patient, we have a top 10 team by the time Mays/Williams are seniors. In the meantime, we make the tournament starting next year and onward.

  5. Alpha Wolf 01/03/2009 at 11:34 AM #

    Sid is by no means a perfect coach, but I think he learned a lot from last year and things seem different this year.

    What will be interesting to me is when he has a talented backcourt for a couple of years – will he be all over them the way that he is the guys back there now? Sometimes it seems like he overcoaches them, but then again, those guys probably need it.

  6. Jeff 01/03/2009 at 11:38 AM #

    I have more faith in Sidney today than I have at any time since his hiring. Most fans seem to understand the evolution. Based on:
    (1) the bare cupboard he inherited
    (2) the nature of how his coaching staff was largely dictated to him
    (3) the promising recruiting of the immediate future

    then I witholding judgement until after year five – just like with Herb Sendek and most coaches.

  7. blpack 01/03/2009 at 11:48 AM #

    Another painful reminder of how inept our AD appears to be.

  8. wolfonthehill 01/03/2009 at 11:49 AM #

    Alright – so despite the request to focus on the topic at hand (Werner), it’s starting to stray toward a faith-in-Lowe commentary.

    I like Sid… I simply see nothing that indicates any progress in our program whatsoever over the past three years. As a program, we seem to always have the “look at our AWESOME lineup in three years!!!” blindness moreso than any other school. It hasn’t panned out in the past, and barring any specific signs of promise and progress, I don’t know why to expect it to pan out by 2012.

    It didn’t take Wake 5 years to recover from crappy recruiting and the death of their coach… why should it take a magical 5 years here, when in three years, we’re simply floundering?

  9. JeremyH 01/03/2009 at 11:50 AM #

    Horner’s chance to show he is not a poor man’s Dan Werner. I hope this doesn’t turn into last year’s Michigan State game.

  10. Alpha Wolf 01/03/2009 at 11:51 AM #

    ^ Your post only proves what an unreasonable overly expecting bunch of bad fans we are. 🙂

    Seriously, that’s exactly what a coach deserves. The fifth year is the year that one can start fairly judging the program. It may be even be longer for football.

    I do think though, that the media will start to fuel judgements on both Sid, TOB and Butch Davis as soon as next year. For each coach, expectations will ratchet higher.

    It’s reasonable to expect marked improvement in both of our programs. For football, that would be a bowl game in a decent destination. For basketball, maybe an NCAA berth. Anything less would be a disappointment and questions would start to follow. They will begin on sports radio, talking head programs and will migrate from there to here and the monkey boards…if it happens.

  11. Greywolf 01/03/2009 at 12:00 PM #

    “Fowler was probably busy in his secret bunker concentrating on his short game and his Texas Rigs instead of staying in touch with valuable recruits.”

    I’m not aware of any AD who keeps “in touch with valuable recruits” Doesn’t our AD do enough legitimate stuff worthy of criticism? The ususal procedure is to retain an assistant from the departing staff to maintain recruiting contact. Alumni in a position of influence, will dismiss this and ultimately discredit SFN as “not in touch with reality.”

    SFN: LOL!!! You never disappoint!

    Are you aware of many ADs who take over a month to hire a basketball coach in the middle of key recruiting times?

    Who was this secret assistant from the departing staff tapped by Lee Fowler to ‘keep in touch with the recruits’?

    Why was that person so unsuccessful at their job?

    How many times did this person contact the families?

    What were they saying to the recruits that failed so miserably?

    How was Lee Fowler NOT responsible for the transition between coaches?

    What if Lee Fowler would have played a more active role and actually SOLD NC State? Would that have been such a bad thing?

    Is there something AGAINST an AD actually taking responsibility and contacting recruits and families during a transition? (Obviously not since Fowler did it ONCE)?

    I say, “The ususal procedure is to retain an assistant from the departing staff to maintain recruiting contact. ” You think I said, “Lee Fowler NOT responsible for the transition between coaches?” Does ”
    I say “The ususal procedure is to retain an assistant from the departing staff to maintain recruiting contact. ” You think I said something remotely related to, “Who was this secret assistant from the departing staff tapped by Lee Fowler to ‘keep in touch with the recruits’?”

    Eventually you resorted to name calling. Classy, Jeff.

    It’s only 2:15. 45 minutes left on the clock.

  12. highstick 01/03/2009 at 12:04 PM #

    Werner forgot Sendek’s weakness in math…if you can’t hit 3’s, 2’s win!

  13. Alpha Wolf 01/03/2009 at 12:14 PM #

    Greywolf, had you read fully and/or not selectively posted a quote from my comment, you would have seen this:

    One thing though, didn’t we have someone in the basketball office running what was left of the show at the time? I forget who it was, but I would swear we had one assistant who should have been on top of things…and Fowler should have been on top of the goings-on in that office.

    In other words, you are right, but what you are missing is Fowler did not do his job and manage the person handling the communication.

    Finally, I suppose it is irrelevant and immaterial to you that the recruits and their families themselves state that Fowler didn’t hold up his end of the deal.

    I suppose they too can also be dismissed as not in touch with reality.

    SFN: Who was this person ‘responsible’ ? What did they do well in light of their inability to ultimately succeed? What did they do poorly? What were they asked to do? If Lee Fowler was responsible for setting up this person, what supervision, leadership, guidance and communication did he provide?

  14. redfred2 01/03/2009 at 12:16 PM #

    Simply put, Lee Fowler, as well as those who work in unison with him allowing decisions like the Werner LOI to just go right through without any resistance, and doing all in the name of good manners because they would rather look like good little Boy Scouts than actually being good in athletics, those folks A-L-L SUCK OUT LOUD!!!

  15. Greywolf 01/03/2009 at 12:21 PM #

    “EXCELLENCE” in the year as one of the WORST Athletics programs in all of the major conferences – #53 of 66 in BCS conferences. and during a tenure of compiling fewer ACC Titles than in any 8 year history of NC State Athletics.

    I’m not agreeing with the award of excellence but I’m not asleep to the fact that with this Chancellor and BOT, championships and wins is not on the criteria list for job performance for the AD.

    If an executive is brought in to down-size a business, it would be ludicrous to criticize that exec for failing to grow the business. Fowler was brought in to do a particular job (I’m not on the BOT so my guess as to the actual mandate is inappropriate). Anybody who thinks it was to produce conference championships, I got some property in FL I’d like to sell ya.

    It’s 12:30 PM. I’ll give even money this post will not stay posted until 3:00 PM.

    SFN: You would generally be correct since we don’t typically allow factually inaccurate posts that posit personal opinion as facts with no supporting evidence to back them up!

    But this is interesting. If your uninformed conclusions are correct — and if Lee Fowler (any AD) was brought in to “downsize” and not win championships while NC State was simultaneiously attempting to appoximately a billion dollars between their Achieve! Campaign and fund raising for Athletics…then why in holy hell hasn’t anyone at NC State told the fansase from which they continue to solicit donations based on the supposed promise that the Athletics Department wants to succeed on the field?

    Don’t look now Kennel, I mean Greywolf, but by your line of ‘reasoning’ then you HAVE to criticize SOMEONE at the instiution that seems to be able to do no wrong in your eyes.

  16. 61Packer 01/03/2009 at 12:39 PM #

    Chancellor’s award for EXCELLENCE?

    53rd of 66? Who’d we beat?

    Ever since the Fox turned in the keys to the henhouse, the eggheads have been running the asylum we call NC State athletics.

  17. Alpha Wolf 01/03/2009 at 12:39 PM #

    Greywolf, if what you are saying is true, then it is immaterial whether Fowler stays or goes. The university would simply exchange him for another AD with the same mandate.

    That said, if what you are saying is true, then it is a waste of time and money to donate to Wolfpack athletics. No one buys tickets to watch teams perpetually fail to climb to the top of their respective sport. Loyalty and love of school only goes so far at the end of the day.

    BTW, if you have Florida swampland for sale, I will happily buy it. At the current rate of wetland reduction in my home state due to drought and over-consumption of the water there, the land that is a bargain today is going to be worth much more tomorrow.

  18. BJD95 01/03/2009 at 1:00 PM #

    So many areas for comment!

    First, Jeff hit the nail on the head re staff. We pieced together lots of scraps of info re post-Barnes and Calipari coaching search. A creative AD would have found a way (or at least made a dogged attempt) for Sid to learn the college game from the legendary Larry Brown. Instead, NC State dictated that Sid hire Monte Towe to “guide” him. I didn’t think that hire made sense at the time, and events seem to have proven my doubts well-founded. Ultimately, our staff with only one coach (#3 assistant Pete Strickland) who had any clue how to run a practice.

    That said, Sid is solely responsible for QJ. Although it still shocks me that nobody ran a background check and vetoed that genius hire.

    It all goes back to premise – I make my judgments of Sid with the premise that he had no idea what he was doing (besides Xs and Os that he knew from the NBA) the first 2 years. That was NC State’s fault. I see progress, in terms of how he is handling players and in recruiting. Still, I am not as kind as Jeff – I think Sid has to produce in Year Four.

    (SFN – I had to bold that^ for emphasis as it nails it)

    With Werner, would the team had rallied together like it did in Sid’s first year? Maybe, maybe not. Perhaps McCauley never emerges. Perhaps we do nothing but jack up 3s. Who knows?

    I have no idea who on our roster can guard Werner, so he very well could go off for 30 plus today. We are going to get whipped, one way or another.

  19. Dr. BadgerPack 01/03/2009 at 1:09 PM #

    State probably doesn’t have anyone who can effectively guard Werner– but he has been known to have off days. Had a ton of them last year, but corrected his shooting mechanics this year. Of course, if we had guys who could effectively penetrate the lane and create foul situations, we could get Werner out that way. Reason 3,458 why good guards, hell, even good slashing wings, are critical in college ball. Can’t defend a guy? Go at him… I have yet to see the college coach who can draw up scoring plays for a guy with his butt glued to the pine.

  20. SEAT.5.F.2 01/03/2009 at 1:47 PM #

    One crazy Spring (early summer!) of 2006. Simple question and a very abstract one. Was it true that Fowler lost between 20-30 lbs during the coaching search? Ive heard of people getting sick from traveling to third world countries, maybe inquiring a tape worm, or heavy regiments of excercise/pilates…But shedding that many lbs during a coaching search?! Maybe just a petty thing or rumors.

    Another Q? Costner/Davis/Werner/Horner all from NJ. WTF!! Atleast Sid lets Harris go down to Atlanta where actual deep pools of talent reside.

    And since this is kinda of a edgy thread let me give my great irony opinion of how Sids early career has gone. We got JJ Hickson to sign because Sid coached in the NBA (and Harris is a great recruiter) and in turn had last years follies. But.. Brown, Howell and the PG for ’10 Harrow all wanted to come play for Sid because he played the game around his best player, who was Hickson. Had Costner and McAuley gotten their way and turned the head coach into their personal butler then these type of players would have not given Sid the time of day, IMO

  21. VaWolf82 01/03/2009 at 2:40 PM #

    Here is an interesting statement from Miami about blocking which schools their QB can transfer to:

    Marve is still prohibited from transferring to schools in the Atlantic Coast Conference and within the state of Florida. But those three SEC schools remain off-limits, Miami officials said, because of the belief that discussions about Marve transferring to one of those institutions has been going on for some time.

    “The University of Miami has reason to believe that the Marve family or others on behalf of the Marve family contacted those institutions during the 2008 season regarding Robert’s potential transfer prior to him having been given his release by UM,” the university said in a statement released Friday night. “We are not suggesting any wrongdoing on the part of any of the universities mentioned.”

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/ncaa/01/02/marve.transfer.ap/index.html

    Contrast this to the way the Davis situation was handled.

  22. Greywolf 01/03/2009 at 2:53 PM #

    “In other words, you are right, but what you are missing is Fowler did not do his job and manage the person handling the communication.”

    Alpha Wolf,
    I did miss your contradictory paragraph after the one I addressed. Not intentional I assure you. I was posting about a comment I thought stood alone.

    I would have to agree with your above statement but I would modify it to say LF did not do his job and manage the Assistant AD in charge of basketball. To manage the person handling the communication directly would be a violation of the lines of communication.IMO

    It’s not that I think LF can do no wrong, it’s that when EVERYTHING he does is judged as wrong, then it becomes an EVERYTHING/NOTHING phenomenon. Everything/Nothing is the phenomena where if everything is a certain way, then nothing is that way. If everything is white, then nothing is white. Why? because you can’t see white. If everything LF does is wrong, you can’t see the wrong.

    This is why I am against interpreting everything Fowler does as wrong. Did he bungle the basketball hire, Hell yes. Did he bungle the recruit retention, I don’t think so. I may not agree with the decision to release, but that in and of itself does not make it “NC State way of laziness, self-loathing and conciliation for the helping push these kids right out of the door.”

    I believe that some of the things LF does that the BOT sees as excellent, should be let stand as excellent to provide contrast for the really important stuff to be seen in contrast. As long as the Chancellor and the BOT is having to defend LF from relentless attack, they cannot be objective in their evaluations and see the faults.

  23. JeremyH 01/03/2009 at 2:54 PM #

    test

  24. JeremyH 01/03/2009 at 2:56 PM #

    yes…

    Larry Davis, Chris Wright, Jamelle McMillan… that left quite a hole, didn’t it.

    I’m fine giving our AD some of the blame for the gap in communication to recruits. As highlighted in many a posts, there is no repercussions for poor performance, so why go out of your way to reach for excellence? Doesn’t exactly scream quality, does it.

    Go pack.

  25. Greywolf 01/04/2009 at 10:47 AM #

    It all goes back to premise – I make my judgments of Sid with the premise that he had no idea what he was doing (besides Xs and Os that he knew from the NBA) the first 2 years. That was NC State’s fault. I see progress, in terms of how he is handling players and in recruiting. Still, I am not as kind as Jeff – I think Sid has to produce in Year Four.

    (SFN – I had to bold that^ for emphasis as it nails it

    Yeah, this really nails it. That it is NC State’s fault that Sid didn’t know what he was doing the first two years? I’m not even going to ask how is it NC State’s fault or how is this FACT and not opinion.

Leave a Reply