$100MM non-TD (11/19 update)

Monday, November 17th
I thought about this last night and was glad to see that someone tackled the issue of the bad call by the officials at the end of the San Diego @ Pittsburgh game. Deadspin has it covered at this link.

An estimated 100 million dollars was wagered worldwide on the Pittsburgh/San Diego game, according to RJ Bell of Pregame.com. Approximately 66% of that money was on the Steelers; with only 34% on the Chargers.“If the touchdown was properly upheld, Steelers bettors would have won about 32 million dollars instead of losing big. This admittedly incorrect call resulted in a 64 million dollar swing in favor of the bookies.”

Update: Wednesday, November 19th
This story continues to interest and fascinate me…so, I appreciate Deadspin for providing some follow-up of the fallout in this link that includes video from a hot MILTPATTPW.

One thing the National Football League is definitely not talking about is the whole point spread issue. As one astute reader even pointed out to us, an AP story about the game that appeared on NFL.com was exactly like the AP story that appeared every where else in the world, with just one minor omission.

“The call affected betting on the game since the Steelers were 5-point favorites and would have covered if the touchdown counted.”

That was the last sentence of the story as written, but we guess NFL.com had space constraints or something because it was cut from the version that appeared on their website. Problem solved!

So that was quietly swept under the rug, but the league is loudly considering an actual substantive change based on the referee’s blown call. There has been talk about changing the replay rules (before the playoffs start) to allow officials on the field to go back and consult with the replay booth more than once per challenge. That way both zebra crews will have an extra opportunity to properly screw things up.

But at times like these, it’s important to consider the real heroes who have been most affected by these trying times—the bookies. Maybe you’re not sympathetic to their plight, but that’s probably because your bookie is a heartless thug who steals your soul as he picks your pocket and not an adorable stay-at-home mom who smells like fresh chocolate chip cookies and runs a sports book out of her kitchen. Yes, Bookie Mom—the world’s best bet-taking recipe-sharing video-blogger—was quite pleased with how things worked out. And gracious in victory, too.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

'08 Football General Headscratchers

14 Responses to $100MM non-TD (11/19 update)

  1. Noah 11/17/2008 at 1:58 PM #

    Mike & Mike were talking about this on their show. I didn’t watch the game, so I don’t know what the correct call was. But I would hate to think that the officials were considering the gambling angle when reviewing a call.

    Gambling is the super-ugly side to football. I’ve heard numbers that were staggering on how many people watch simply because they bet on the games. Football, for whatever reason, is THE sport to gamble on. Only fools and people who hate their own money gamble game-to-game on basketball. Boxing is totally corrupt. And the baseball lines are too confusing.

    Football’s like gambling on a coin-flip.

  2. Sam92 11/17/2008 at 2:26 PM #

    the officials do not have any responsibility, whatsoever, to people who bet on the games

  3. MatSci94 11/17/2008 at 2:31 PM #

    So people really think that Tom Donaghy is the *only* ref in the history of professional sports to take money for influencing a game? With this kind of money going around?

  4. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 11/17/2008 at 2:42 PM #

    Sam,

    Provided it isn’t the officials doing the betting.

  5. Wulfpack 11/17/2008 at 2:57 PM #

    “This admittedly incorrect call resulted in a 64 million dollar swing in favor of the bookies.”

    My first thought is, good. Don’t get me wrong. It would truly suck to lose some cash over an incorrect call at the very end of a game. But for those that bet on athletic contests, that has to be part of the deal. If you are willing to put your hard earned money on the line with sports, unpredictable and crazy as they can be at times, then you have to accept the cold hard reality that errors in officiating are part of the deal.

    The part of this that I haven’t heard being discussed is Pomalalu’s decision to carry the ball in. Why? Just fall on it, game over. Shouldn’t have ever been an issue if he would have just done the right thing.

  6. ncsslim 11/17/2008 at 2:57 PM #

    This is specifically why I don’t bet. This call was dramatic in regard to the line, but had absolutely nothing to do with the game. People bet on exhibition and all-star games. That’s one habit/vice I absolutely don’t understand. I don’t give a rat’s ass about the morality issue, the entire passion of the game changes when the line becomes the issue vs merely winning or losing. I was thinking of this when I watched the play; either way it had nothing to do with the outcome, relative strengths of the teams, or anything other than a betting line. It’s just like watching the end of a bball game where the winning team does or doesn’t take the last shot and impacts the line. It’s about as stupid as gambling on the stock market…. well maybe not that stupid.

  7. Par Shooter 11/17/2008 at 3:13 PM #

    My understanding of point spreads is that Vegas tries to get the wagered money split evenly amonsgt the 2 teams. That way the house doesn’t have an interest in which teams win or lose but simply makes the “juice” which is something like 10%. I would be very surprised if any game had 2/3 of the action in one direction.

  8. theTHRILL 11/17/2008 at 3:25 PM #

    I have never wagered on anything in my life, but a friend of mine in college was a legitimate addict. Even though I didn’t personally have anything at stake, the games were definitely more interesting when watching with him. As has been noted, it’s amazing how a last second seemingly insignificant play can be a HUGE deal in gambling circles.

  9. GAWolf 11/17/2008 at 3:59 PM #

    But as Par Shooter points out… wouldn’t the opposite be almost just as true? So, this is really a pointless story other than to show the amazing AMOUNT of money at stake sometimes in the closing seconds on a play that is otherwise pointless.

    I was watching the game and it appeared that Tomlin didn’t want the TD and was ready to end the game when the refs told him to get the guys off the field for the extra point.

    So if the Steelers’ fans want to blame anyone, they can blame their coach.

  10. BJD95 11/17/2008 at 6:04 PM #

    That BS call cost me 14 fantasy points. I will still win my matchup, but it could cost me in total points for year/top single game points side bets.

    Damn it all to hell. Why review an inconsequential play like that anyway?

  11. john of sparta 11/17/2008 at 9:37 PM #

    gambling is the one vice i could fall for.
    (therapy session follows)

    i do not fear putting my money/life where my mouth is.
    i have and i do gamble. how about I-40? it’s been said:
    the most dangerous thing in the U.S. is your car key.
    NCAA pools? well, of course….even at my church. yep.
    however, it’s for bragging rights, no money.
    deep down, i know if i started, i couldn’t quit.
    ESPECIALLY football. NFL or NCAA.
    bottom line: the Elephant in football’s Room is Gambling.
    it powers TV, recruiting, sponsors….all that.
    you know it. i know it. let’s keep it to ourselves.

  12. whitefang 11/18/2008 at 7:14 AM #

    Fox News ran a story on the game this morning 2 days after the game was played so the “story” continues.
    The only way the amount of money bet would have been that one-sided is if the fix was really in across the board – players, coaches, refs, league…
    Conspiracy theories are always fun, but almost always (as I suspect in this case) just a good water-cooler story. Otherwise NFL football would be done. While the money “theorized” to be won by the “bookies” seems big, it is a pitance compared to the worth of the NFL that would have had to be risked.

  13. SaccoV 11/19/2008 at 5:45 PM #

    The importance of this call cannot be overstated. I know that the majority of the readers of this blog don’t care much about point spreads (and I include myself in that group); however, there is a clear appearance of impropriety here. I watched the game, because I have both Philip and LT on my fantasy team and have connections to Pittsburgh. The referees made the correct call on the field, and then that correct call was overturned to affect the final score of the game. Period. If this isn’t as suspicious as Tim Donaghy and the NBA referee scandal, I don’t know what is. Besides, Ed Hochuli’s earlier screw-up with the Chargers has already made each fan aware of glaring mistakes referees have made which have definitely affected outcomes of ball games. There are always calls which are missed in the standard course of the game (holding penalties, etc), but issues at the END of the game that have no bearing on the outcome should be clearly made. The refs had the call right, gave Polamalu the TD, end of story. The play went to review (for no apparent reason) and the TD was disallowed on an illegal forward pass? Looking at the film, it is clear there was no forward movement of the ball AFTER Rivers’ pass was initially caught, and there was no illegality of Rivers’ pass. On what basis was the call made? Even if there is no real substance to the alternate assertion of the reasoning behind the call, there is too much awry to dismiss the conspiracists wholly.

  14. wufpup76 11/19/2008 at 7:59 PM #

    I’m pretty much in love …

Leave a Reply