A Date with Coach of X’s and O’s Past

The Arkansas Razorbacks not only gave West Virginia their first loss, they handed Mountaineer head coach John Beilein an early Christmas present. You knew when Popeye got a grip on a can of Spinach that he would be snapping things back together to ship shape in a hurry. That’s no canned spinach in Beilein’s hand, it’s a remote control. The film of the title game of the Old Spice Classic in Orlando is being consumed, and in a matter of hours the modified Princeton offense will be flexing it’s strength like a bicep with a sailor’s tatoo.

Meanwhile, before Sidney Lowe takes the Wolfpack to Morgantown, he and his assistants will have an opportunity to regroup from their first loss of the season. They will undoubtedly see some encouraging things in the film room of what happened in the ACC opener against UVA, a 67-62 loss in Charlottesville. What doesn’t need much film to explain itself is the method Beilein’s last opponent used to approach the game. After reviewing the motion offense and 1-3-1 defense that WVU teams are notorious for, Arkansas head coach Stan Heath went into Sunday’s showdown with a clear message to his players.

“We had to attack them,” Heath said. “We couldn’t play east and west. We wanted to have a vertical attack. We wanted to get through some of those gaps and seams and try to play north and south.”

Wild as the Hogs were at times (19 to’s), the attacking scheme resulted in about as many high percentage shots as you could ask for. Couple that with a resounding 38-18 rebounding edge, and you get a game that was not as competitive as the final score might suggest.

The WVU Mens Basketball team resembles a rock band (The System) that has disbanded and since hired some fresh faces around front man Beilein. A solid recruiting class (including 7’1″ transfer Jami Smalligan, a Pittsnogle type), and a potential million dollar buy out later, leave us to wonder if the coach can be to the modified Princeton offense what John Fogarty was to Credance Clearwater Revival. Or, if too many gifted and gutsy players left the system Beilein is so busy breaking down in studio, I mean film room, right now.

Darris Nichols (pg, and leading scorer), Frank Young (wing with good mid range game), and Alex Ruoff do the primary ballhandling and outside shooting. While both Joe Alexander and Rob Summers have decent post games, rebounding has caused them problems. In essence, this is really a clash of styles and basketball philosophies. No one can argue with the great run Beilein has had at WVU the past few seasons. Winning on the road in a Big East environment is extremely difficult these days, and it will take an extreme effort by the undermanned Wolfpack. If you have gotten this far and read about Beilein’s efforts to get the team on track after tasting their first defeat, then you have to go back to the message Coach Lowe has been telling his players.

06-07 Basketball General

40 Responses to A Date with Coach of X’s and O’s Past

  1. primacyone 12/05/2006 at 9:43 AM #

    Rebounds baby, and I don’t mean John Beilen’s forthcoming year after flirting with leaving the band to become the leader of the pack.

    I like our chances. Either way, I am so damn excited we have a coach that knows what the hell you are talking about and will play a vertical game if it is the right thing to do and rather than just try to have my band play the same music louder than your band and hope that you miss more notes than us.

    Reminds me more of Lawrence Welk than a Rock Band. When I think of that offense I think accordion. With I think of this year’s wolfpack, I think Elvis or Johnny Cash or Kirk Cobain. They were not scared of anybody or any precedent or any SYSTEM. They just went vertical, and aggressively vertical at that.

  2. vtpackfan 12/06/2006 at 8:45 AM #

    Rebounding is going to be crucial to say the least. If we do as good a job as we did against UVA in the first half then I would have to say the night belongs to the Pack. WVU came into the game avg. 23 forced to’s a game against some mid majors who had probably not gone up against alot of trapping 1-3-1. Arkansas turned it over 19 times, but it hasn’t exactly been the Hogs trademark over the years to take care of the ball. WVU got the ball 19 times off of TO’s and 18 times from rebounds. That just sounds completely odd IMO.

    If we limit their second chance attempts, and continue to stay out of foul trouble (how this has worked so far is a mystery to me), then it will come down to what set plays and soft spots Lowe and Co. try to execute. I’ll have a radio nearby for this one.

  3. packpigskinfan23 12/06/2006 at 8:55 AM #

    so no hope of any TV coverage in the eastern NC area for tonights game… is there?!?!

  4. Rick 12/06/2006 at 9:00 AM #

    Can you imagine the snoozefest this would have been had we had to watch two POs go at it?

  5. packpigskinfan23 12/06/2006 at 9:03 AM #

    ^hahaha!!! hey, I REALLY need the sleep… this working at 2am stuff is killing me!

  6. Cardiff Giant 12/06/2006 at 9:07 AM #

    This would have been, barring a change at State, possibly the most boring basketball game in the history of the world.

  7. Pack92 12/06/2006 at 9:07 AM #

    Rick summed up what I was thinking. IF HS were still at State I am quite sure we would lose because Beilein seems more capable of adjusting hos orchestra. No matter, it would have been boring. Hopefully this will be a Skynyrd vs. the orchestra and we end up playing Freebird.

    I have also been amazed at our ability to not lose players to fouls. Anyone else think the problem we had with that last year was due to frustration on the player’s part?

  8. packpigskinfan23 12/06/2006 at 9:08 AM #

    didnt we loose to WV last year?

  9. vtpackfan 12/06/2006 at 9:09 AM #

    Hope? Nope. But radio may be fun to have on tonight in the background. Something crazy may happen. Gavin may snap when he see’s the Mountaineers run their offense. At first he may talk trash to his man , saying “you call that spacing, you so and so. I’ve never seen back cut timing so off. Get out of the top of the key, don’t you know your not a big man?”
    Then like the Water Boy with Adam Sandler he’ll look up and see Herb’s mug on Coach Beilein. Then, w/o the shreiking, he’ll go for a cool triple double.

    You can really learn to appreciate radio when you’re as twisted in the head as I am.

  10. highonlowe 12/06/2006 at 9:14 AM #

    If you have DirecTV and live in NC, the game comes on channel 626 (Mid-Atlantic Sports Network), same channel the Chuck Amato show was aired (now called the NC State Football Show).

    It also comes on ch622 (YES) and ch628 (Fox Sports Pittsburgh), but if live in NC you have to have the sports pack or premiere package.

  11. packpigskinfan23 12/06/2006 at 9:15 AM #

    hahahaha… awesome.

    I will most definatly listen to WPTF if I cant get the game on the tube!!!

  12. highonlowe 12/06/2006 at 9:18 AM #

    On offense, we’ve got to run the floor (shoot the gaps like vt said) and keep the turnovers down (they’re #1 in the national in turnover ratio).
    I’m not sure how we’ll come out on defense. Zone probably won’t be effective against their 3-pt shooting.
    We definitely can win this game, it should be a good one

  13. Texpack 12/06/2006 at 9:28 AM #

    I have only had DirecTV for a few months, but I have been told that you have to be careful about games on regional sports networks that are also part of ESPN Game Plan or Full Court. Even if you have the sports package, they will sometimes be blacked out if they aren’t on your normal home area regional network. I will be interested to see if the game is available in Texas on MASN, Yes, etc. This game will bring back road trip memories for me. In December of ’82 the HOZE Squad took a road trip to The Meadowlands to watch State play WVU in the second game of a doubleheader that featured St. Peters vs. Arkansas as the opener.

  14. partialqualifier 12/06/2006 at 9:30 AM #

    Good Luck Pack!! Playing slow will help our “sea-legs” after that tough game on Sunday. The 1-3-1 zone is ging to be a tough one for our guys. We only one guy who drive thru the lane (Grant), and he will have to do that while having to bring the ball up and run the offense. That is a lot to ask. The big key tonight is Courtney Fells. He has got to be able to make a few perimeter shots, and as a 2 Guard his ball handling must improve. This is the type of game where he needs to be aggressive driving the ball. My prediction is the score will be in the upper 50’s or low 60’s and will wind up being a one or two possession game. Common sense tells me we will be lucky to win, but our team has been so resilient and inspired….who knows?

  15. vtpackfan 12/06/2006 at 9:39 AM #

    Nieman could be a factor with the ball in his hands against the zone. Maybe at times he has opted to not force the dribble and penetrate because the man to man is too “one on one” for this point in his development. The zone may give him confidence that he can drive and look for a igh percentage shot or create better looks for others.

    I agree Fells will be important but I would also like to see him run the base line some against the zone (WVU will switch to man a little bit). It worked great for Arkansas and I beleive that having Fells freed up and attacking the basket could tip the rebounding/slash loose balls in our favor. He is a great athlete and I wonder if ballhandling and floor vision may stifle his aggresssive skills.

  16. HungryLikeTheWolf 12/06/2006 at 9:54 AM #

    If you live in Raleigh and you have Time Warner Cable, I found out that you can order tonight’s game via pay-per-view channel 701. It’s $15 for the entire day of games, but I’m going to go ahead an do it. You have to order via channel 699.

  17. beowolf 12/06/2006 at 9:58 AM #

    We played WVU in Raleigh two years ago, losing 82-69:
    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/recap?gameId=250020152

    Ironically, we were without our leading scorer in that game, too: Julius Hodge.

  18. Lock 12/06/2006 at 10:29 AM #

    I guess I’m one of the few who didn’t find the PO boring…ah well. For once, I’ll definitely be rooting against it. And with our new coach and new system, I would not mind at all being shown first-hand that the Princeton offense has irreconcilable flaws.

  19. gumbydammit 12/06/2006 at 10:33 AM #

    ok I admit that this is petty, but I see this mistake on Pack boards everywhere repeatedly and it drives me nuts, so please indulge me this rant:

    “Lose” is the opposite of “win”
    “Loose” is the opposite of “tight”

    The Pack will never “loose”, though in the past they did “lose” far more often than anyof us would like.

  20. Rochester 12/06/2006 at 10:38 AM #

    Sign up for ESPN Full Court. Throw in the sports pack. Then don’t look too closely at your Directv bill and you’ll enjoy basketball season a lot more. I have to get those or I wouldn’t get half the Wolfpack games up here in NY. They still do occasionally black a game or two out for reasons I will never understand. But you get to see a lot of hoops.

    If I recall that WVU game a couple years ago came right after the St. John’s debacle. It was around the same time, at least. Ugh. What a horrific spell that was.

  21. Wolfpack4ever 12/06/2006 at 11:52 AM #

    I wonder if the PO after some popularity will go the way of some fb offenses. Last year I noticed — when I didn’t now off — that we weren’t getting near the number of back door cuts were got in previous years. Could have been my imagination but I don’t think so. My guess is that coaching caught up to it. Somebody like the Hogs is going to do something that works and being the copy-cat business that sports are, others are going to do that samething. Coaches like Beilein will keep modifying to stay ahead but sooner or later the concept goes bad. Just an uneducated guess.

  22. vtpackfan 12/06/2006 at 12:29 PM #

    “that we weren’t getting near the number of back door cuts were got in previous years. ”

    Your right. Last year Herb either thought he throw teams off or utilive his perimeter shooting by having guys fake back cuts and return to the same position on the 3 pt. circle. Not that it mattered, every team sagged in when our secret weapon Cedric Smmons received the ball in the ideal spot to feed the back door, near the top of the key.

    Beilein runs almost exactly the same offense as Herb did last year, except instead of Simmons it was Pittsnogle. Lots of spacing for the “psuedo drive” and the kick out. That is what the offense has modified into. Gone are the back cuts and picture perfect bounce passes the Princeton teams’ used. Now we hear stuff like, “we’re recruiting players who fit the system”. Translation: Versatility in terms of ball handling and shooting coupled with some size. If these players were also good finishers in prep ranks, they soon find out that wasn’t what “recruiting to fit the system” meant. Bennerman and Brackman found that out, as did Gavin Grant.

  23. redfred2 12/06/2006 at 1:14 PM #

    “Not that it mattered, every team sagged in when our secret weapon Cedric Smmons received the ball in the ideal spot to feed the back door, near the top of the key.”

    vt, Exactly! Etimov standing over on the wing with his hands in pockets after more than proving that was his position as a FRESHMAN. He made it all work, but he saw less and less time posted there, until it was almost always Simmons fumbling to get rid of the ball without turning it over.
    What the hell was that? If you can’t already tell from this post, that was the move that finally sent me, screaming and on fire, right over the edge.

  24. Rick 12/06/2006 at 3:13 PM #

    “I have also been amazed at our ability to not lose players to fouls.”

    I was noticing this too.

    I cannot figure out if it is because of improved technique or refs giving more respect.

  25. vtpackfan 12/06/2006 at 3:31 PM #

    The defense, specifically man-to-man, has been outstanding. These players are giving gut wrenching efforts out. They are chasing players all over the court, fighting through screens, all while playing more minutes or a different position then they are accustomed to.

    The best example I can come up with on the matter is the following. When you’re playing man-to-man and you are beaten on the dribble you are entirely at the mercy of your man and help defense. If the help defense is not able to shift over then the only thing stopping the offensive player from scoring is himself. Far too many times you see a defender who is beat go for the swipe steal or block from behind. It works with less frequency then the old first and third pick off play by a pitcher in baseball, and yet it still happens all the time. The only reason it works once in a great while is that the offensive player does not put his body between the defender and the ball after he has gone by, something we are taught to do early on. My point is you don’t see Sids players attempting this high risk low reward style of defense. It, along with solid footwork and technique have led to this remarkable feat of staying out of foul trouble.

Leave a Reply