Bilas: Basketball Scheduling Comments

I had the pleasure of running into Jay Bilas this week at the Starbucks in the Bank of America Plaza ib downtown Charlotte. I took the opportunity to tell him how great of a job he does and how much everyone – even a rabid Wolfpacker – appreciates his balance, preparedness and analysis.

Bilas was very open and engaging even though I was trying to give him space and not bother him. He asked if there had been any word on Andrew Brackman’s decision and I quickly shared the update from SFN that Brackman has not been working out with the Pack but that the staff held out hope that Brackman would ultimately miss the sport and his teammates and reconsider. I was pleasantly surprised when Bilas responded that he thought that Brack should play both sports for one more year and that there are some folks in the NBA that wish Brackman would continue with the sport.

Anyway, the purpose of this entry was to focus on Bilas’ most recent piece for ESPN Premium subscribers. Bilas wrote a super piece that “Some accepted beliefs about scheduling are myths.” This is the kind of analysis and coverage that makes ESPN’s premium package worth the money.

Coaches can schedule games to toughen teams up and prepare to win a championship, to bring a young team along and to learn while winning, or to gain valuable TV exposure. Some coaches and programs even schedule games in order to — audible gasp — make money.

When scheduling, it is vital to know your team and your objectives. You have to provide challenges to your players without beating them up. You have to schedule wins. You have to schedule games of interest to your fan base. You have to schedule games to boost your RPI numbers. You also have to win enough games to keep your job.

And, as with most art forms, everybody thinks they know how to do it. But not everybody does. Scheduling is fodder for every complaint and conspiracy theory in the book, and most of the complaints have become cliché and urban legend.

General NCS Basketball

11 Responses to Bilas: Basketball Scheduling Comments

  1. ChuckChuck.us 09/30/2006 at 1:16 PM #

    Bilas knows his chit. That he knows that much about Blackman on the spot is pretty impressive. Think about all the programs and players he keeps track of. Nice post.

  2. ShootingGuard 09/30/2006 at 4:09 PM #

    I think Bilas really tries hard to do his homework and present his opinions with some foundation to them—unlike Katz, Digger, and others on ESPN that just spout off a bunch mindless drivel because they haven’t bother to do any homework. Also, Bilas does, for the most part, say his piece without sounding like a smug, arrogant Dukie—unlike Gminski.

    It wouldn’t be shocking to see to see Bilas suddenly throw out a blurb in one of his articles about the Brackman situation. If he does, we’ll know where he got the info…

  3. WolfPup35 09/30/2006 at 5:02 PM #

    I have a great amount of respect for Bilas. He has always done an excellent job in trying to provide unbiased insight into the world of college bball. Mike Gminski is just pissed because Bilas is a better analyst than he is. Phelps is a jackass, and a clueless one at that. Katz just follows everyone else’s lead so he sounds like he knows what the hell he’s talking about.

    On a different note, Brackman should play hoops for one more year, he would be a focal point for the ‘Pack’s offense, and provide an experienced big man on D. The fact that Bilas mentioned people in the NBA looking at Brack, that should tell him to keep on playing on the Wolfpack hardwood.

  4. redfred2 09/30/2006 at 11:32 PM #

    If Brackman is a lost cause for 2006 and S Lowe, it’s not all because of what has occurred on the baseball field, it’s because of what DID NOT occur on the basketball court over the past two seasons.

  5. WolfPup35 10/01/2006 at 4:39 PM #

    If the kid can run, then he can play in Lowe’s system. Imagine another Marcus Melvin. Lowe should not give up on Brackman. Keep on trying to convince him to don the bball uni one more time, and see what he can really do.

  6. cfpack03 10/02/2006 at 9:48 AM #

    Obviously, Lee and the Sendek regime went the ‘make money’ route. So I’m eager to see how our new administration schedules games the next few years.

  7. packbackr04 10/02/2006 at 10:49 AM #

    Brack’s decision should be whats best for him, as much as we all would love to see him lace it up. I think most, if not all agree here that Brack has a tremendous future ahead of him, regardless of what profession he chooses to pursue. That being said, We really need Brack to play, COme on Brack! lets play some real bball and see what you can do.
    If Bilas wrote an article on Brack and that there is interest in the NBA, it just might spark his interest for a triumphant return the the RBC center…

  8. packbackr04 10/02/2006 at 10:49 AM #

    Brack’s decision should be whats best for him, as much as we all would love to see him lace it up. I think most, if not all agree here that Brack has a tremendous future ahead of him, regardless of what profession he chooses to pursue. That being said, We really need Brack to play, COme on Brack! lets play some real bball and see what you can do.
    If Bilas wrote an article on Brack and that there is interest in the NBA, it just might spark his interest for a triumphant return the the RBC center…

  9. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 10/02/2006 at 1:41 PM #

    Not that this is a choice that many people have but would anyone on this board honestly pursue a career in the NBA over MLB? I can’t imagine Drew would rather be in the fiasco that is the NBA for a couple of years rather than the potential of spending 15 years in baseball.

  10. Jeremy Hyatt 10/02/2006 at 3:10 PM #

    well, also take into account the average longevity of a mlb vs. nba career, you don’t really see many 40yr old point guards. although both professional sports are extremely competitive, nba competitiion level has gone through the roof. But the same rules apply: in basketball, if you can really shoot the rock, there usually is a place for you in the League. in baseball: if you can really {hit/throw/steal/field}, there usually is a place for you. I understand that b-rack is probably hugely competitive, but he also should consider and calculate on his future. it’s a tough, tough call. if he plays basketball this year, he can get a much better feel of where he stands in that arena, and being a competitive and gifted athlete i imagine b-rack would want to measure and push himself to be great. heck, can we just park him behind the three-point line for 5 minutes a game? any input from him in the season that approaches would help.

  11. redfred2 10/03/2006 at 5:05 PM #

    Jeremy, good post.

    I think if he would just give it one more chance, even with a guarantee of limited time agreement at the start, under a new and much more exciting approach to basketball, that his competitive juices would start flowing and he would want more and more playing time as the season progressed. Not saying which is the right or wrong decision for him to make, but if his decision not to play is final, which I think is already a foregone conclusion, he will be regretting that decision terribly not too long after the start of the basketball season.

Leave a Reply