NCSU Football History 101

Our friends at The Red and White from State ran a poll to gather opinions on which Wolfpack football coach was the best of all time. The final results look like this:

– Dick Sheridan…..49%
– Lou Holtz………..21%
– Chuck Amato……13%
– Earle Edwards…..10%

Rhetorical Questions:

– So who did you vote for and why?
(If you didn’t vote….then shame on you.)
– How much do you know about NC State coaches that came “before” you?

There are a few websites that I find absolutely essential as aids to intelligent discussion. One such website is College Football Data Warehouse. Sites like this are literally invaluable because of the wealth of information available with just a few mouse clicks…especially to those of us that need to have our memory jogged from time to time. So let’s see what we can dig out about the various Wolfpack coaches:

Here’s a table summarizing the overall records of Wolfpack coaches over the last 50+ years:

Graph of year-by-year results

So the top three vote getters are also the top three winningest coaches at State over the last 50+ years. (But note that “we” didn’t get them in the same order.) But college football fans don’t really get worked up over winning percentages….they get hyped over:

– Playing in bowl games
– Winning bowl games
– Poll rankings; and
– Victories over your rival(s).

Let’s see how the various coaches have performed in these more “critical” areas:

BOWL GAME EXPLOSION

How many times have you heard someone say that Chuck’s bowl record doesn’t mean anything because there are “too many bowls”? Let’s look at the growth in bowl games for a few minutes:

A review of the information available at the CFB Data Warehouse shows two distinct periods of growth:

– From 11 bowl games in 1975 to 18 bowl games in 1984.
– From 18 bowl games in 1996 to 28 bowl games in 2002.

Here is a year-by-year summary if graphs are more your thing. So what do we make out the increase in available bowl games when evaluating coaches?

The answer is quite simple…increasing the number of bowl games has absolutely no effect on evaluating coaches. Go back to the graph of the winning percentages and look at each year. Chuck should get the exact same amount of credit for a 6-5 season that you would accord Monte Kiffin. The obvious difference between the two coaches is that 6-5 was the high point of the Kiffin era.

MY TAKE

1) Lou Holtz

It’s not really close in my opinion.

– Four bowl games in four years…and in an era where there were far fewer bowl games to play.
– End-of-year national rankings in three of four years

No one else really has the resume to touch Lou. However, you would have to be at least my age (mid-40’s) to even remember when Holtz coached at State.

2) Dick Sheridan

There were several things that I didn’t remember until I was looking over the numbers:

– 6-1 vs UNC
– 2-4 in bowl games
– Three national rankings in six years.

Most anyone would look good after three years of Tom Reed…but Sheridan clearly had one of the best tenures of any coach ever. I wish he had stayed longer, but I suspect that working for Todd Turner wouldn’t have been alot of fun…so I don’t begrudge Sheridan a long and happy retirement.

One more thing in Dick’s resume that needs to be highlighted is the fact that he turned down the chance to follow Vince Dooley at Georgia to stay at NC State (in addition to passing on overtures from South Carolina, Auburn, LSU and Arizona). Sheridan truly wanted to be at NC State and believed in what was growing in Raleigh. Those moves earn Sheridan a fond place in any Wolfpack fan’s memory banks. State’s bowl record under Sheridan keeps him from offering serious competition to Holtz for the top spot in our poll.

3) Earle Edwards, Bo Rein, and Chuck Amato (TIE)

Just based on the numbers, I put Earle Edwards in to create a three-way tie. However, I have absolutely no rememberance of his years at State so I can’t say anything good or bad about him. He had some good years and some that weren’t…but there was one little factoid that I ran across which convinced me to include him:

– From 1956 through 1964, State played UNC in Chapel Hill every year. Edwards had a 6-3 record over those nine years…thus earning him a place in my list of top coaches.

Bo Rein probably doesn’t get enough credit for his years at State:

– State’s last conference championship (1979) along with the nation’s toughest schedule (IIRC)
– Two bowls and an offer to a third in four years. (Once again, it was tougher to make a bowl game during this era.)

Obviously, LSU thought enough of Bo to hire him away from State. I am certainly glad that the ACC is much more of a football conference than it was back then. It is absolutely no fun to watch good coaches get hired away by bigger programs.

And finally we get to Chuck:

– Second highest poll ranking in State’s history
– Five bowls in six years

Now before someone starts whining about “minor” or “useless” bowls…go back and look at the winning percentage graph. The simple fact of five winning years in six seasons places Chuck near the top of the list for NC State coaches. (Don’t bring up the OOC schedule unless you are prepared to discuss the increased difficulty of the conference schedule and have the same info for past coaches as well.)

It is all right to want more in the future…but don’t forget where Chuck fits compared to State coaches over the last fifty years. Those people claiming that Chuck is on the hot seat simply show that they don’t have a clue (In my humble, but accurate, opinion).

Post Script:

I have another entry that I am working on covering NC State football history. Life has severly restricted my time to participate at SFN and these entries are dragging out longer than I had planned. Until I get a chance to finish the second part, keep the comments focused on the past and not next season or future years. (Haven’t we heard the same opinions enough for now?)

Don’t forget…I’m not bashful about deleting entries that don’t stay on topic.

About VaWolf82

Engineer living in Central Va. and senior curmudgeon amongst SFN authors One wife, two kids, one dog, four vehicles on insurance, and four phones on cell plan...looking forward to empty nest status. Graduated 1982

Chuck Amato General NCS Football Tradition

34 Responses to NCSU Football History 101

  1. Mike 08/07/2006 at 3:53 PM #

    10 who voted for O’Cain were………… Mack Brown, Steve Spurrier, Mike O’Cain’s wife, O’Cain’s kids (think there were 2), Greg Doyle, Tom Reed, coach at Baylor, Paul Pasqueloni (Syracuse coach), and Herb Sendek.

  2. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 08/07/2006 at 4:30 PM #

    I heard several different reason why Dick left but I don’t know which is true. Regardless to leave at the time he did hurts the program which in turn hurt his legacy regardless of the reason. V got in trouble because he had some players try and find easy professors and pissed off some academic pinhead (according to Bob V.) and that hurt his legacy. A lot of times things happen beyond someone’s control but it still a part of the resume.

    Don’t get me wrong I think Sheridan was a great coach for the program but not Holtz. Lou always wanted to be at Notre Dame and he spent his career trying to get there. Nothing wrong with having a goal and pursuing it. To say Holtz would of had the program in trouble is kind of like saying Sendek would of won a tournament (any tournament) if he had another 10 years to ‘rebuild’ the program.

    It was the the run up the middle that was called almost every play in the 4th quarter that lost us the ECU bowl game. We keep scoring it doesn’t matter what Blake does. I think one of the Dick’s lack of a killer instinct is what hurt him the most. He was a nice man and when the team got a lead the intensity often would vanish in thin air. I felt that he didn’t want to ever be accused of running up a score or would do anything to make the other coach look bad. There is no room for that in modern college football.

  3. BladenWolf 08/07/2006 at 4:47 PM #

    I voted for Sheridan. In school I suffered through Kiffen, Reed, and then had a taste of the beginning Sheridan years. IMHO Holtz gets too much praise as a “great coach” while really being a great motivator/speaker instead. Holtz saw NCSU as a means to a greater end. Good coach, but not the greatest. I think a lot of folks color their thinking of Holtz due to what he accomplished after he left us as well as what he did here for four years.
    On the other hand, coming from Furman, Sheridan was thankful to be here and was completely sold on the Wolfpack. You could tell it just by talking with him. Unfortunately, he did bring those awful nSc diamonds with him from the Palidans uniforms.
    I don’t buy the “left us in the middle of summer” thought. You could say the same thing about Holtz bolting for greener pastures couldn’t you? Comparitively speaking Sherridan did more with less than any coach we had. To take Tom Reed players and complete for the conference championship AND go to a bowl game the very next season – your first as a Div I coach?

    Also, I remember a State team taking down the conference big boys at the time (in Maryland and Clemson) on a regular basis while whippin’ the smurf’s ass just about every year (6-1).

  4. redfred2 08/07/2006 at 5:32 PM #

    I’m not going to praise Holtz for going to Notre Dame, but I am certainly not going to beat the man down for elevating his career to a point where they’d considered him to be their head coach. That doesn’t happen every day you know.

    And especially after running over the basketball coaching talent that’s available out there now. It’s good to know thats at least way back when, there were coaches who went looking for it, and weren’t afraid to take on more of a challenge.

    “To say Holtz would of had the program in trouble is kind of like saying Sendek would of won a tournament (any tournament) if he had another 10 years to ‘rebuild’ the program.”

    Anybody can get NC State into trouble, there’s no administration to stand up to the media, the slightest mention of the NCAA makes them all roll over and spill their guts anyway. Lotta fans right there with ’em.

    Lou Holtz wanted to be at the top. What’s wrong with that?

  5. choppack1 08/07/2006 at 5:36 PM #

    “It was the the run up the middle that was called almost every play in the 4th quarter that lost us the ECU bowl game. We keep scoring it doesn’t matter what Blake does. I think one of the Dick’s lack of a killer instinct is what hurt him the most. He was a nice man and when the team got a lead the intensity often would vanish in thin air. I felt that he didn’t want to ever be accused of running up a score or would do anything to make the other coach look bad. There is no room for that in modern college football.”

    I remember two key plays in that game that I feel cost us the game. If we make one of them – I believe we win.
    1) A key dropped pass on third and short – I won’t mention names, but if you were there or you watched on TV, you remember.
    2) The shanked punt – this was key in shifting the momentum of the game and gave ECU great field position.

    Aside from that game, I don’t recall many other collapses by a Sheridan-coached team.

    That game is one of those dark days in my Wolfpack sports memory – right up there w/ the 2004 UNC-Ch-State game, the losses to UNC in Charlotte, the Duke collapse in the ACC tourney and the Vandy and UMd collapses at the end of the 2004 season.

    Back to Sheridan – in his last 3 years he several chances to make a statement. These would have been accomplished by beating ECU or Florida, or winning a conference championship. None of these happened under his watch.

    I think he was a great man and a great coach – and I was never as proud to have someone represent our university – the above paragraph would be the only complaint I’ve had about him.

  6. Mike 08/08/2006 at 10:10 AM #

    I dont begrudge Holtz for wanting to move up. Who wouldn’t want to move up? And yes, any coach can get us into trouble. My point was Holtz has been in trouble every place he has been, proven track record.

  7. pack550 08/08/2006 at 4:16 PM #

    I want to discuss ACC records to compare Sheridan and Amato to indicate why Amato is clearly behind Sheridan (and Holtz, too) and why Amato deserves some criticism.

    ACC Record: Sheridan: 31-18-1 Amato: 23-25

    Sheridan: winning record against ALL ACC teams except UVa (1-6) and FSU (0-1); this includes Mary (5-2), Wake (6-1), UNC (6-1), Clem (4-3), GT (4-3), and Duke(5-1-1).

    Amato: winning record against NO ACC teams except Wake (4-2) and Duke(4-0); losing records against Mary (2-4), Clem(2-4), GT(2-4); .500 records against FSU (3-3), UNC (3-3), UVa (2-2), and VT(1-1). (To be complete, BC (0-1) and Miami (0-1).)

    Yes, the ACC is tougher today than in Sheridan’s days, but Amato has done a very solid job against FSU, VT, and Miami (4-5 cumulative).

    What’s disappointing about Amato’s teams is the 19-20 record against all the other ACC teams. Over the course of Amato’s six season’s, have UNC, GT, Mary, UVa and Clemson been vastly better than when Sheridan coached? I don’t see it. (By the way, Duke is definitely worse now given Spurrier coached there in the late 1980s.)

    The closest ACC peers to NCSU football are UNC, UVa, Clemson, GT, BC, and Maryland. An 11-18 record against these teams deserves some heat.

  8. GoldenChain 08/09/2006 at 9:28 AM #

    I remember something else that sets Sheridan apart: his discipline.
    I forget the infraction, but it cost Nas Worthen a year of his career. I doubt seriously that you would see that happen from anyone else today.
    Dick was squeaky clean (which might explain why he didn’t recruit better than he did).

  9. Gene 09/18/2006 at 11:39 AM #

    Chuck w/o Rivers is a mediocre, at best coach. With Rivers, he seemed slightly above average. Chuck might be his own worst enemy, in making fans want to contend for ACC titles in football, but we do now want to do this. Fans spent money upgrading facilities to do this. If Chuck can’t succeed, and by all indications he doesn’t seem to be heading in the right direction, we need to replace him.

    We have the players, in place, thanks to Chuck – he is good at two things, player development and recruiting – to do better than a 20 point loss to Southern Miss.

    We just need a coach, who can get the most out of what we have.

Leave a Reply