Valentine: Diva of the College Game

We discussed at length the Ted Valentine situation at the Final Four. You should click here.

Yesterday, ESPN’s Pat Forde used the insane Tim Duncan vs Joey Crawford situation to spark a great column on basketball officials. The entire column can be read here (along with video).

Some selected passages from the piece are included below:

2. The Final Four travesty in Atlanta.
Three refs seemed to be racing each other to saddle the stars of one national semifinal — Ohio State’s Greg Oden and Georgetown’s Roy Hibbert — with fouls, ruining one of the most-anticipated matchups in the past 25 years. It was almost as if they had made a bet: First guy to force the big men to the bench drinks free after the game. Result: Oden played 20 minutes and Hibbert 24. But at least we got to see a lot of very dramatic posturing by the guys who are supposed to blend into the hardwood.

So most of the time, they get my respect for doing a truly thankless job. But these recent examples of what I’d call control-freak officiating are troublesome for the sport.

Sometimes, you watch these guys — it’s not just Crawford or that diva of the college game, Ted Valentine — and wonder whether there is a persecution complex/power trip associated with putting that whistle in the mouth. Instead of serving as levelheaded stewards of the game vested with the authority to enforce fair play, they occasionally come across as bouncers in a bad mood while juicing on Dianabol.

Spoiling for a fight with the first guy who mouths off, that is.

The Final Four debacle was less egregious but indicative of the same problem: officials who seemed overly eager to show who’s boss, at the expense of the matchup every fan in America wanted to see.

If ever there were a game to let the big men play, this was it. It never happened, thanks to the hypervigilance of Dick Cartmell, Mike Kitts and (of course) Valentine.

Houston coach Tom Penders sagely said on ESPN Radio before the Georgetown-Ohio State game that he’d know how the game was going to play out when he saw which officials walked on the floor. I wonder whether Penders took one look at the crew and left the Georgia Dome before tip-off.

But this was only the culmination of a whistle-stop NCAA Tournament. As my friend Eric Crawford of the Louisville Courier-Journal reported last month, second-round NCAA Tournament games averaged nearly 38 personal fouls and fans were treated to 1,981 free throws in the first two rounds.

Nothing is quite as thrilling as watching almost 2,000 foul shots in four days.

That’s partly caused by poor play and poor coaching, which resulted in the abandonment of offensive flow late in the shot clock and the inevitable headfirst drive and ensuing block-charge call. (There are no jump-stop jump shots in college ball anymore.) But it’s also partly caused by compulsive whistle blowing, often in anticipation of a foul that never happens.

Mostly, the March Madness foulfest gave fans a chance to boo and coaches a chance to posture on national TV. (One of my favorite moments every March is when some outraged coach wheels around at the scorer’s table and shouts something at the attending member of the NCAA men’s basketball committee about the officiating. As if the committee member might stop the game right then and there to address the obvious wrong inflicted upon the persecuted coach’s team.) It also mucked up the games.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

General NCS Basketball

41 Responses to Valentine: Diva of the College Game

  1. CedarGloveWulf 04/19/2007 at 7:19 AM #

    Ted is every bit as good a ref as the “Great One” was a coach.
    It is not his fault his eyes are going bad. He is a 386 processor in a Pentium world.

  2. tractor57 04/19/2007 at 7:22 AM #

    Officials should be a lot like the old quote about children -“seen but not heard”. By that I mean they should manage the game in a manner that doesn’t call attention to themselves – which is one of the reasons I never liked Lenny Wirtz. Valentine and Crawford are the exact opposite of this view – it’s all about them. And if Duncan called Crawford a piece of #@$% – Tim was right on there. Basketball officiating basically sucks – I don’t think it is partisan – just BAD

  3. WTNY 04/19/2007 at 7:37 AM #

    Before this steamrolls into a “Refs stink”-fest, go back and watch a 1983 Pack game and then a 2007 game. One of the most striking differences is the physical nature of the game. Hand checking, moving screens, and very physical post play are the rule today. And that’s not even mentioning the palming, traveling, etc. that is now allowed.

    Yes, the ref divas are a problem, but so is the way the game is played today.

  4. tractor57 04/19/2007 at 7:42 AM #

    WTNY
    My complaint isn’t the foul calling usually it’s the obvious need to be the center of attention from many refs these days. I agree the game is not played in a much more physical style (which I don’t really like).

  5. noah 04/19/2007 at 8:15 AM #

    There’s a difference between a ref making himself the center of attention and a ref simply calling a tight game.

    I didn’t have a problem in the final four semis…because THOSE WERE ACTUAL FOULS.

    If Oden doesn’t want to spend time on the bench in foul trouble, he should avoid setting moving picks 20 feet from the basket in plain view of everyone on the planet.

    Do we really want a star system in basketball where only crappy players are capable of committing fouls? That’s the NBA…and that’s why no one watches the NBA.

  6. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 8:15 AM #

    I certainly hope the officials as a whole, aren’t going to try to use the current style of play in collegiate basketball as an excuse for their behavior, that would be an open admission that they have lost focus and control. Which, of course, they definitely have. Comparing the play now, to 1983, just showcases that the everything about basketball on the amateur/collegiate level is now geared to the NBA. It’s not about college basketball anymore, the NBA has been allowed to totally take over a much better amateur game. Most kids aren’t even thinking about college ball anymore, they want jump as quickly as they can, and there’s no doubt that an overwhelming majority would skip college altogether if they could.

    It’s not an NBA mini-camp, so call the games tighter like they should be, and like the officials have a right to do, and then just get out of the way.

  7. choppack1 04/19/2007 at 8:49 AM #

    Noah – I actually agree w/ your post. I didn’t have a problem w/ most of the fouls called. I did find the championship game amusing – I believe this was called by ACC officials…These guys showed how to take your marching orders – Oden was allowed to push off, hook and make contact. It makes me wonder how they are instructed to call a game in the ACC.

    I’m not a big fan of Ted Valentine and his showboating – Paparo was a notorious showboater, too….But really isn’t that just an annoyance. I’d rather have a headstrong ref out there committed to calling a fair game rather than someone using the “star” system utilized in the ACC or the NBA.

    Like others, I think a big part of the problem are what players are allowed to get away with these days. Handchecking should be called outside of the paint. Lowered shoulders are charges (sorry Shaq). A forearm to the back is a foul.

    Finally – in basketball, what’s the definition of a carry or palming? It used to be fairly clearcut – like walking – until MJ.

  8. TNCSU 04/19/2007 at 8:59 AM #

    rf2 and Noah,
    I agree with both posts about the officiating. I think the college game should be called tighter. I think Shaq did alot to ruin the NBA game, personally. The guy can’t shoot from farther than 5 feet, yet is considered one of the best players ever because he backs his player down and dunks over them. Holding defensive position doesn’t mean anything in the NBA game. I do agree that there should be the same half circle for charges that the NBA has. WRT to Oden and Hibbert, some of those fouls were of the “ticky tack” variety. Again, I think Hansbro “initiates” contact all the time, and it is NOT called. Overall, I think the refs do an admirable job, but when they go overboard, they do need to be called on the carpet, so to speak.

  9. GoldenChain 04/19/2007 at 9:09 AM #

    The fouls I have a problem with are the ones when a defender holds his hands straight up, has good position, and the shooter leans into him and draws the foul and those seem to be numerous. Or the incidental contact after the shot which has no bearing on the shot.
    I agree that the game has changed dramatically and the refs have themselves to blame for many of those changes. Hasbro has developed the three-bunny-hop layup into an art that other post players are copying. Let a 2 guard try that 20ft from the basket and he gets called every time.

  10. noah 04/19/2007 at 9:17 AM #

    “The fouls I have a problem with are the ones when a defender holds his hands straight up, has good position, and the shooter leans into him and draws the foul and those seem to be numerous.”

    Same here.

    I think you could make good money on a pay-per-view show where a guy sat down with a ref and made the ref justify his own calls for an audience. I’d love to hear a ref explain why that call gets made.

  11. choppack1 04/19/2007 at 9:52 AM #

    Noah – I agree 100%. As long as officials are accountable only to those in power – in this case, the NBA front office, the NFL front office, the NCAA, or the ACC office – there will be no accountability to the fans.

    I think that basketball officials have the toughest job – and not surprisingly, I also think they do the worst job of keeping the game they officiate fair.

    Problems arise when the officials deviate from the rulebook. Once you do this, someone has an advantage – that by rules, they aren’t supposed to have. We saw how handchecking was used against Engin Atsur this year to wear him down and to get him to retaliate w/ frustration fouls. A similar situation existed w/ the Braves in the 90s. Glavine and Maddox relied on getting the strike called a bit off the edge of the plate. If the catcher lined up right on the edge and the pitch ended up where the catcher had initially set up his glove, Glavine and Maddox often got the call…I’m a braves fan, but it can’t be denied that this gave them an advantage.

  12. TNCSU 04/19/2007 at 10:09 AM #

    I concur also, Goldenchain. The ticky tack fouls after the ball has left the shooters hands, and has no bearing on the shot.

    I think more refs need to go watch some pick-up games, and find out what “players” consider to be a foul by watching what gets called when the players call their own. Of course, in my league, drawing charges is illegal! 🙂

  13. highonlowe 04/19/2007 at 10:14 AM #

    Maddox still gets his wide strike zone. I noticed it in the Padres-Cubs matchup earlier this week. Miller, Chicago’s pitcher, would land one on the same spot and its called a ball. Miller got pissed, mouthed off to the ump, and Lou had to come out to calm everyone down. Then the ump took off his mask, got in the middle of the ring of players, and mouthed off just as bad as Miller was. Seems like in the 90s, the umps would just stare ’em down stone-faced
    I could be generalizing based on a few minor events, but maybe we’re seeing a new generation of officials in all sports. Pretentious, insecure, divas on a power-trip.

  14. noah 04/19/2007 at 10:26 AM #

    Maddox gets that call because of the late break on his pitch. Where the ball ends up and where it crosses the plate are two different locations.

    BTW, umps being out of control are nothing new. On Dan Patrick’s show the other day, Keith Olberman told the story of an umpire in the 1980s in Cleveland tossing out a manager for trying to look at the scoreboard.

  15. ncsu96 04/19/2007 at 10:41 AM #

    who was the official who T’ed up Horner in the Marist game?

    He just about stared a hole through Horner’s back trying to bait him….what a jackass!

    Maybe, I’m only noticing now but there seem to be a lot of refs who think making calls is part of the ‘show’. I’ve also noticed refs who think they are the ‘show’ tend to make the majority of the calls even when they’re not in position to have the best view. It only takes one bad apple to ruin a game.

  16. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 10:59 AM #

    ^Yeah, kind of like beowulf’s most often pictured actor, and umpire, Leslie Neilson.

  17. Pack84 04/19/2007 at 11:09 AM #

    I had to LOL reading these comments. Most of you simply have NO CLUE what you’re talking about.

  18. TNCSU 04/19/2007 at 11:14 AM #

    Oh, please enlighten us, most knowledgable one!

  19. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 11:19 AM #

    I rather go in the opposite direction, and I definitely don’t want to see the officials bringing in any more playground antics than they already allow, but like TNCSU said, intentionally drawing charges, and I’m talking under the basket especially, also not saying that someone like Shaq is can push people out of position, but the rest of it around the basket is nothing but for p*ys. Either make an attempt to block/get a hand in the face/impede the player from getting to the spot to begin with/but when there’s a clear lane and undoubtably no way to stop it, then just get the hell out of the way, or, be prepared to get charged with a foul. If there is ever even any question at all, the call needs to go to the offensive player.

  20. ToddKeune 04/19/2007 at 12:02 PM #

    As sports fans, I assume many of you have had the chance to ref a game at some level? If only Jr high? I guess I have a little respect fro the refs. I find basketball to be much harder to ref than football. As a player, all I could ask for was consistancy – what is/isn’t a foul is the same on both ends, and for the entire game. That’s how I try to be. A couple minutes in you know what you can and can’t get away with. There are ALOT of judgement calls. Refs don’t have slow-mo instant replay. I think most do a great job. Ever disagreed w a call, and then in slow-mo realize he got it right? Yes, sometimes they get it wrong. We seem to focus on the bad calls. When I do good, nobody remembers – when I do bad, nobody forgets

  21. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 12:20 PM #

    Todd

    I hate when the outcome hinges on a questionable call by an officiating crew, everyone does. But otherwise, I’m well aware of my own bias, and try to give the benefit of the doubt elsewhere after I’ve calmed down. There are cases where the officials need to set an early and consistent tone, but they aren’t supposed to jump ahead of the play on the court, and ‘create’, just to to get their point across.

    My beef is more with what the officials have decided to allow in college BB nowadays. Especially when it’s clearly apparent that they aren’t prepared to consistently handle the judgement required in what they’ve determined to be their new rules.

  22. ToddKeune 04/19/2007 at 12:44 PM #

    I agree, NEW besketball sucks. Palming alowwed is unbelievanle. What happened to basketball being a ‘no contact sport’?

    As per the defenders hands STRAIGHT UP and being called for a foul. I once asked the ref why the foul? He said you brought your arms down – yeah, after a shoulder in my chest.

  23. msmzyk 04/19/2007 at 1:28 PM #

    Did any one else notice that the Forde article no longer contains the last paragraph highlighted by SFN?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. game » Valentine: Diva of the College Game - 04/19/2007

    EPOovn Great post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  2. boy advanced advance » Blog Archive » Valentine: Diva of the College Game - 04/19/2007

    […] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptWe discussed at length the Ted Valentine situation at the Final Four. You should click here. Yesterday, ESPN’s Pat Forde used the insane Tim Duncan vs Joey Crawford situation to spark a great column on basketball officials. … […]

Leave a Reply