02/13/2014 at 1:45 PM #40586
Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night can stop our weekly ACC updates.
[See the full post at: Snowy ACC Update]02/13/2014 at 1:50 PM #40587pakfanistanParticipant
I don’t see any way we make the NCAA tournament this year. We haven’t risen above our level all season, and I don’t know why we would start to now. We’ll probably win some of the games we should be close in, lose to Syracuse and Pitt, still not have any good top 50 wins, and be NIT bound.02/13/2014 at 2:05 PM #40589MPParticipant
Wow, less than 10 years ago WF and GT had good teams….02/13/2014 at 2:45 PM #40593PapaWolfParticipant
I know it is highly unlikely and there is probably money involved, but I would love it if Deb Yow decided we are never going to the NIT. Nobody cares about it. It is a sign of failure. And I don’t buy into the “tournament exposure helps us get ready for tourney play next year” crap. You ever hear anyone say, “the reason we did so well in the NCAAT this year is because we tore up the NIT last year”? Nope.
I say, NCAAT or nothing.02/13/2014 at 3:01 PM #40596wilmwolf80Participant
These numbers are great, but all we need to do is win, the rest will take care of itself. Stay focused on defense, don’t turn the ball over, and make our free throws. That’s what this team needs to focus on, those are all things within their control. The things that they lack, which are well documented, are things that can’t be easily changed. But, we have shown stretches of play this year that indicate that we at least have the raw talent to beat most any team we play. I see no reason why team confidence, momentum, and TJ can’t carry us to a bid.02/13/2014 at 3:06 PM #40597
But, we have shown stretches of play this year that indicate that we at least have the raw talent to beat most any team we play.
I’m sorry that I missed those stretches.02/13/2014 at 3:27 PM #40599tjfoose1Participant
I’m sorry that I missed those stretches.
You must a blinked.02/13/2014 at 3:35 PM #40601WeAreCuredParticipant
How does Lunardi still have Clemson above State in his bracketology? Granted, he doesn’t have them as in, but he does have them as the 6th team out on the bubble, with State nowhere to be seen on said bubble. He still has FSU in, as well. That says a lot about the value he places on who you beat.
FSU RPI – 64
FSU SOS – 43
*wins over VCU (23) and UMass (20) on neutral floors
Clemson RPI – 68
Clemson SOS – 127
*Win over Duke (8) at home
State RPI – 51
State SOS – 39
*win @ Tenn. (50)
Better numbers, but no wins to speak of. They have to win at least one of the @ Cuse, UNC, @ Pitt games, but I don’t see it happening. This season’s chances at the NCAA Tourney were over very early (January 4th) with the Pitt home loss, preceded by the @ Cincy loss in November and the Missouri home loss.
FSU, like State, has 3 opportunities to boost their RPI before the ACCT, with 2 of the 3 being at home. Tennessee will need to hold on for dear life to remain a top 50 team, as they only have 2 remaining games against number 48 Missouri as their only two games providing any sort of opportunity. They could do something in the SECT, though. That said, State could very easily end up with 0 top 50 wins. I actually think this is the most likely scenario.
More or less, State is not in a very good position at the moment, but they have some opportunities ahead. Still, I can’t see it happening. Too many chances squandered.
I’m not that disappointed, though. I didn’t expect anything above middle of the pack in the ACC this year, and am actually pleased with that outcome. They’ve gotten better as the season has progressed, and that is nice to see. I hope TJ comes back. If so, next year could be an above average season. If not, likely more of the same, but like I said, if “the same” means getting better as the season goes on, then that is fine by me. If you put enough seasons like that together, you may rise to the top eventually.02/13/2014 at 3:44 PM #40603navParticipant
How about some damn defensive rebounding would be nice to see. I think we could have blown out a few more teams if we could just catch the ball coming off the opponents rim. Esp the Miami game.
And FT rebounding. Holy crap. I used to take it for granted that when the other team missed FT’s we could get the ball. Not anymore. I’d say we have a 50/50 shot of getting a rebound off a missed FT. That alone has to be the most frustrating part of this team.
Aside from that, I do enjoy watching this team. They seem to have pretty good chemistry and I feel they have it in them to go on a decent run and make a good showing in the ACCT. I could see a late season surge similar to Lowe’s first year team.02/13/2014 at 4:01 PM #40604Pack85EEParticipant
Well, even with all the RPI discussion, it still looks like going 10-8 in conference is bubble with some work to do in the tourney and 11-7 should be in.
But, per above, it would be better if that 10-8 (4-3 rest of way) came with a win against Cuse, UNX or Pitt and a loss against one of the others, then to beat all the others and lose those 3.02/13/2014 at 4:11 PM #40605hpackParticipant
If we thread the needle, beating all remaining teams except UNC, SYR, and PITT, we fishing 10-8 with no top wins. IMO we’ll need 2 in the ACC T.
If we finish 10-8, beating PITT, SYR, UNC, and choking to one of others (a much higher probability than scenario above IMO) we probably need 1 in the ACC T.
If we manage 11-7, winning 9 of last 13 with at least 1 win over UNC, SYR, PITT, I think we are in even with 1st rd loss in ACC T….We’ll sweat like heck on selection Sunday though.
Only longshot win in last 7 is SYR. PITT and UNC are definitely winnable. I would be pleasantly surprised if we don’t lose @ Clemson or trip against at least 1 bottom feeder.02/13/2014 at 4:29 PM #40607Pack85EEParticipant
hpack, you have it about right. Maybe we only need 1 win in tourney at 10-8 w no big wins, but assuming that 1 win is not a big, then, yea, two wins, because that second win will finally be our big win. Or we could get lucky and the selection committee realizes we are better than FSU and Clemson and does not want to stick the ACC w only 5 teams. Personally I think they would love to shaft the ACC.
I think we need to win at Clemson and at Pitt on our way to 11-7.
But this was a long shot a week ago. We expected to win the last two so going 4-3 is still a bit of a long shot. Going 5-2 will take some real gutsy performances.02/13/2014 at 4:32 PM #40608packbackr04Participant
+1 for VaWolf. I missed those stretches as well. We arent awful, but were not real good either.02/13/2014 at 4:57 PM #40611JeremyHParticipant
10-8 with wins over @Clemson and UNC, and no loses against lower-half ACC teams, might be the most realistic best possible outcome. (I don’t see @Pitt in the cards for this young team, and @Syracuse goes without saying). And if they pull off @Clemson and UNC, which are remaining, important barometer games, then they certainly should be good enough to put 1 or 2 together in the ACCT.02/13/2014 at 5:26 PM #40618BJD95Keymaster
I’ve got no problem with the NIT this year, with this roster makeup. This definitely doesn’t have the feel of a team that could make a surprise run once in the NCAAT, anyway.02/13/2014 at 5:47 PM #40626hpackParticipant
Selection committee has no issue shafting the ACC. The brand has been tarnished for some time now.
PITT feels like a redemption game. I think we’ll have a good shot.
The holes’ season is very similar to ours. I think we have a good shot.
@ Clemson has been a house of horrors over the years.
TJW is improving every game. Now, with 3 point shot, he’s becoming unguardable. Can finally bust zones by putting TJW on one wing and RT on the other. Would love to see TJW go off in ACC T and finallly bring one home for the Pack. (hey, we can dream)02/13/2014 at 6:31 PM #40636wilmwolf80Participant
VA, we’ve had this discussion before. I know you are a numbers guy, but when I watch a game I don’t see statistics, I see how the teams are playing. Every game this year, and I have watched them all, we have had stretches where we went on 10-0 runs, played tough defense, converted on offense, out hustled the opponent, etc. The only exception was the UVA game, in which we played like turds from the tip. Even the Duke game, we had a run early in the first half to tie the game up in which we played some fundamentally sound ball. The team is talented, but outside of TJ, they are all very raw, and we all knew (or should have known) this coming in to this year. If you read my post, you will see that I said that based on raw talent we can beat anyone on our schedule. If you can’t see that raw talent that these kids have, then there’s nothing I can do to show you what I’m talking about. And if you haven’t seen those stretches where we looked really good, then you weren’t paying attention, or just reading the box score. Nowhere did I say we were a good team. But I can tell the difference between a talented team that is on the cusp of putting it all together, and a crap team that has reached a plateau, I’ve seen enough of those over the years.02/13/2014 at 6:48 PM #40640
Games last a lot longer than 3-5 minutes (or even 20 against Pitt). What I’ve seen is State get blown out by every good team that they’ve played. That doesn’t even include losing to Central and choking away a huge lead against Mizzu.02/13/2014 at 6:54 PM #40641WulfpackParticipant
What I’ve seen is State get blown out by every good team that they’ve played.
Yep. And IF we are fortunate enough to be in the discussion, don’t think for a minute that this won’t be the story. As it should. We’ve got to show something against the good teams left on our schedule – we’ve got to show we belong. I don’t currently think we do.02/13/2014 at 6:57 PM #40642bill.onthebeachParticipant
But I can tell the difference between a talented team that is on the cusp of putting it all together, and a crap team that has reached a plateau, I’ve seen enough of those over the years.
… and this year’s team definitely ain’t one of those year’s teams…
Wolf82… you GOTTa at least agree… that this year’s team is a better team with more potential than last year’s team…
I’ll betcha a buck right now…. that by the end of the season… this year’s team will be 30-50% better than they are right now…
They have turned the corner and will strong… if injuries and some external craziness doesn’t stop them/#NCSU-North Carolina's #1 FOOTBALL school!02/13/2014 at 6:58 PM #40643old13Participant
Maybe OT, but Wolfpack WBB is 22-3, ranked 10/13 and a VERY tough group of players IMHHO. The ladies DESERVE our support and I see no topics in this regard!
Otherwise, in my view, NCAAT or nothing for MBB. What’s the NIT!!!!02/13/2014 at 7:13 PM #40645john of spartaParticipant
wins regardless of when?
well, maybe, but wins at the end (against anyone)
have been the tie-breaker in Ever(ett)y Case.02/13/2014 at 7:31 PM #40647Fastback68Participant
Wilmwolf80 – “Can’t you say something righteous and positive for a change?”
Just kidding of course. The answer to that movie line would also apply to “What did State’s math look like towards the end of the regular season in 83?”
Nobody knows where this team is going. I just hope Gott can keep a straight face when he tells TJ, we need you to play at a higher level the rest of the way.02/13/2014 at 7:51 PM #40648xphoenix87Moderator
I find myself unable to post in the forums. It just gives me a message saying “Error: Your reply cannot be created at this time.” Is it just me? Anyone else having this problem?02/13/2014 at 7:54 PM #40649tractor57Participant
I love the stats although I would not spent the work developing them so many thanks there. Beside the stats the old eye test shows me a young team that is in the midst of sorting things out as compared to last year’s team that was talented, experienced and consumed with chemistry issues. At this point I see a true bubble team for the NCAAT but I also see a team on an upward track.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.