- This topic has 45 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
NCAAT men’s basketball championship banners coming down qualifies as “dropping the hammer”.
Does anyone really care about anything else?
Yep. I am thinking a 3 year post season ban and loss of scholarships and banners coming down would make me smile.
I think it’s more likely we will see 2 year post season ban for football, 1 year for basketball and 3 for women’s basketball and some minor scholarships reductions. IMHO, that is something above a wrist slap, but it ain’t no hammer and discourages no one.
Va – I want multiple post season bans – the banners coming down don’t mean squat. They still got to enjoy the moment and the fans don’t have to return the t-shirts.
Appropriate sanctions or not going forward, I find it hard to fathom that any banners will come down.
I think it’s more likely we will see 2 year post season ban for football, 1 year for basketball and 3 for women’s basketball and some minor scholarships reductions. IMHO, that is something above a wrist slap, but it ain’t no hammer and discourages no one.
pakfan,
If we see this or more then I will eat crow.Va – I want multiple post season bans
Agreed. But I’ll still be disappointed (but not surprised) if at least one banner doesn’t come down.
BTW I don’t really consider that to be getting hit much but it is more than I expect. I don’t believe that punishment would change the balance of power whatsoever. After getting the ballyhooed NOA, UNC proceeded to be nationally ranked in both sports, whip our tails in both sports and recruit better than us in both sports. I don’t expect that punishment or anything the NCAA deigns to do will impact that in the least.
I have been having to read your incoherent babbling posts for years so for you to question anyone else’s intelligence is comedy of the highest order. Your posts need an Ovaltine decoder ring to be classified as English.
I don’t have any trouble understanding CD-ese. What he said seemed real clear to me.
So, Henderson isn’t healing properly from his injury, and Lennard isn’t healing properly from his injury. Who exactly is the team doctor?
So, Henderson isn’t healing properly from his injury, and Lennard isn’t healing properly from his injury. Who exactly is the team doctor?
I kid, I kid. I’m sure our sports medicine team is very good.
Actually, I know the front line is.
I have been having to read your incoherent babbling posts for years so for you to question anyone else’s intelligence is comedy of the highest order. Your posts need an Ovaltine decoder ring to be classified as English.
I don’t have any trouble understanding CD-ese. What he said seemed real clear to me.
You caught him before his fourth ‘pripple’ ( prune juice and ripple).
PJ&R is an underrated delicacy.
Whoooops….’scuse me. I gots a little something something brewing. I hope the plumbing holds.Appropriate punishment would be a one year postseason ban for every year they made the postseason using ineligible players.
I am predicting the following
MBB – 3 year postseason ban, possibly 4. I don’t think the NCAA will go 4, but this is far and away the most egregious competitive advantage case in NCAA history.
FB – 2 year ban only because they served one year already.
WBB – 3 year postseason ban
Scholly reductions of 20-25% in the guilty sports for 4-5 yearsUmptijillion wins vacated including 2 Natty’s, multiple ACC Championships, blah, blah, blah
Installation of an NCAA employee as AD
^Don’t forget the orange slice, Wuf.
Natch. I find it gives the movement a fresh citrus-y aroma.
In the early framework, I was told that 5 yrs postseason across the board was put out there. That, of course, will not happen.
More than likely 2yrs (or 3) for MBB,FB,WBB,quite possibly a yr. each for the soccers, and baseball.
Each with all the trimmings, including forfeitures, and championships if ineligible players apply to those given years.
Whatever the talley, I heard that the men behind the UNx curtain had recently discussed sacrificing this yrs MBB team as an offering to appease the gods. If true, this means things are very bad for them.
Each with all the trimmings, including forfeitures, and championships if ineligible players apply to those given years.
The unx apologists that are trying to hide behind the invisibility cloak of “it’s an academic issue” seem to forget that if a player took part in a fake course, then he/she was not in good academic standing. It should not matter if the athletic department knew about it, or steered players to those courses. If they were ineligible, they were ineligible. Am I right?
That’s a hit parade I could get on board with.
Yes, I ended my sentence with a preposition…shut up.That is a rule with which I shall not up with put.
Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy. Mao Zedong
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
