Flashback: NCAA Report on the NC State “Scandal”

A member close to the Men’s Basketball team from the mid to late 1980s sent me an email this morning of snippets from the NCAA’s report involving the Shoes and Ticket “Scandal” of the late 80s. Unfortunately, all I was able to obtain were images of the report, and at that, they were truncated. After some Google searches, I was unable to actually locate the report in its entirety. Nonetheless, it does have some telling samples (emphasis mine):

In addition, the committee instructed the university to develop and implement a system for administrative control and monitoring to ensure compliance with the NCAA legislation.

The committee said it did not find that any clear and direct competitive advantage accrued to the North Carolina State program as a result of the violations in this case. The committee, however, determined that the case was major in nature principally because the university “failed to control its intercollegiate athletics program in complaince with the rules and regulations of the NCAA” in two primary areas — the handling of complimentary admissions to regular-season and Atlantic Coast Conference tournament baskebtall games, and the manner in which the basketball shoes were issued to the members of the team.

Further, the report says that NC State cooperated enough with self-imposed sanctions that it did not deem a TV ban to be necessary. The self-imposed penalties were:

a. No off-campus recruiting and no official paid visits for the 1989-90 academic year.

b. A limitation on basketball grants-in-aid [scholarships] to 12 for the 1990-91 and 1991-92 academic years.

c. A reduction in the men’s basketball coaching staff for the 1989-90 and 1990-91 academic years to one head coach, two assistant coaches and one of the two other coaches permitted by NCAA legislation

In other words, because some tickets and shoes were sold which did not provide any benefit to competition, NC State self imposed reductions in scholarships and staff as well as recruiting restrictions. The NCAA found this as acceptable to its almighty power. Shoes. And Tickets gave us Les Robinson.

Not that I have to compare and contrast for our well-informed audience, but for those meandering over here from search engines, lets compare that to the current situation at North Carolina.

  • Rogue Tutors
  • Rogue Department Heads
  • Rogue Agents (aka Rouge Assistant Coaches)
  • Rogue Department Admins
  • Rogue Coaches
  • Rogue Term Papers
  • Rogue Extra benefits to players in the form of hotels, parties, and jewelry
  • Rogue Parking tickets mysteriously paid
  • Rogue Academic and Athletic Advisors routinely shifting players towards Rogue Departments for no-show classes to maintain eligibility
  • Rogue Clustering of athletes into one department that turns out to be Rogue
  • Rogue FERPA violations by posting a star athlete’s transcript online (which shows a GPA of 1.8)
  • A very clear and unhealthy expensive cupcake eating habit

And so far, Mark Emmert and the Almighty Power of the NCAA who decided to hammer Penn State for what was essentially an issue that did not aid competition on the field (and I’m not saying Penn State didn’t get what they deserved), has remained silent. The line coming from the NCAA is that they’re done with UNC. They did their investigation, levied a bowl ban and some scholarship losses. Oh and probation.

Meanwhile, it’s become abundantly clear that the NCAA did not do a thorough job of their “investigation”… err, Review… as the most severe and major academic issues were uncovered by nameless Internet sleuths all the while UNC remains defiant and only comes forward with information after the toothpaste is out of the tube.

I believe that the NCAA, although they claim to be through with UNC, will be compelled into action. The multi-billion dollar, TAX EXEMPT organization has its credibility on the line not just with UNC but with a slew of other schools that are seemingly receiving far worse penalties for doing things that pale in comparison to perhaps the largest academic fraud case that not only UNC has seen, but the NCAA and all of its member institutions. Because of this and because of the desire for self-preservation, the NCAA will be compelled into action.

Lets hope that the media continues its barrage of stories. One media outlet seems to be silent though… where’s ESPN? Or does that question even need to be asked?

UNC Scandal

35 Responses to Flashback: NCAA Report on the NC State “Scandal”

  1. packalum44 08/15/2012 at 3:18 PM #

    I’ve exchanged emails with Yow. She can’t really say much via email, but she responded promptly. I copied Mark Emmert, BOG members and Dan Kane on it.

    Basically just to make a point and vent. The more people that email or call, the more public pressure applied, the more news stories, the more scrutiny we put them under, the harder it is for them to sit by idle.

    The special BOG committee would never had occurred without public pressure. I’d be shocked and outraged, along with thousands of NC taxpayers, if they do not take action in October. Now, how substantive the action taken, well that is where the concern still lies.

  2. runwiththepack 08/15/2012 at 5:44 PM #

    I was just listening to Adam Gold, who I like, actually. But I didn’t like what I was hearing.

    And I don’t necessarily disagree with what I heard him say. “Don’t shoot the messenger”, is what I’m saying in so many words. He may be right in what he says, regarding how the NCAA looks at this dung heap in Orange County.

    Adam Gold was saying that the NCAA views the academic “aberrations” in Chapel Hill this way: the NCAA can NOT expect the coaches or others to know that the classes were fraud!

    Just because:
    -classes didn’t meet,
    -there were no exams,
    -the athletes seldom had any trouble making a B or better grade,
    -most of the classmates were other football and basketball players,
    =and the coaches knew that most of these ball players struggled to make good high school grades,
    -the professor was out of the country while supposedly teaching,
    AND,
    academic “advisors” steered their boys to these Dr. J. classes…

    … does NOT mean that they should be expected to know that something was fishy with Dr. Kangaroo’s classes.

    As long as there is no evidence that they knew something was fishy, it doesn’t matter that they had their heads up their asses.

    CONTRAST that with the statement above that NCSU’s infractions were “major in nature because (NCSU) failed to control its intercollegiate athletics program in compliance with the rules and regulations of the NCAA” in two primary areas – complimentary game tickets and the manner in which athletic shoes were distributed.

    I see. So it is of utmost importance to monitor shoes and tickets, but it’s okay to be totally oblivious about academic fraud, even when it’s clear to see.

  3. Wufpacker 08/15/2012 at 6:08 PM #

    ^ Unless your last sentence in not supposed to be sarcastic, then it sounds to me like you do not agree with Gold’s opinion on this. Nor should you. Gold’s logic is off here.

    But then again, the NCAA hasn’t exactly acted logical lately, so who knows? Maybe that really will be their BS excuse, but I hope they realize the reaction that might bring.

    And besides, if an athlete’s overall GPA is skating on the thin ice of 1.8 or worse, suddenly being able to make B’s or above consistently in ONLY one dept. or from one professor should not escape anyone’s notice…

  4. tobaccordshow 08/15/2012 at 7:28 PM #

    Yes, I don’t see Gold’s logic at all. Isn’t the case at UNC the very definition of complete loss of institutional control?

  5. BureauOfMines 08/15/2012 at 7:57 PM #

    “While I am enjoying the show thus far, it could end up doing more damage to the ACC as a whole if this thing gets ugly.”

    You mean you don’t think this already is ugly?

    “Now we’re talking about potentially stripping two National Titles and multiple final four appearances for one of the two schools that have carried the conference in basketball for two decades?”

    Yeah, because they cheated most egregiously. Between keeping their athletes eligible who could barely read and write to their refs calling touch fouls on one end and allowing muggings on the other and ignoring traveling, they carried the conference.

    “… there may be a lot of collateral damage to the conference when this is all over.”

    There’s no may about it. There will be a lot of collateral damage to the conference when all this is over. Bank on it. But keep in mind said collateral damage has nothing to do with what NCSU people have done or said or even how much you and I have enjoyed watching UNC squirm. The collateral damage is all UNC’s doing and nobody else’s.

  6. packpowerfan 08/15/2012 at 8:26 PM #

    Wife, just wanted to point out that a 1.8 GPA is not “thin ice” anymore. The UNC system minimum is a 2.0 after Freshman year.

    Apparently the namesake of the system couldn’t give a shit.

  7. ADVENTUROO 08/15/2012 at 8:32 PM #

    My wife, who is very astute and also fanatical, said that she thought the whole Butch Davis thing was over….even after the revelations about Jennifer and the whole sordid mess.

    She said that the reason it was over was because the UNC faculty did NOT get up in arms….like St. Monteith’s hord of holy haluncinators did about Valvano.

    BUT, since the academics has now taken a life of its own and the mess is bigger and smellier than (fill in your own —– as Old Roy said to day at the Golf Tourney), it is NOW a STORY.

    You gotta wonder HOW the BOG can let this by.

    I wonder if the Middle States Commission of Higher Education will get in this fray. They are the ones that are now threatening PSU for their PHEW….

    Who knows, but each day it is a gift….Manna from the heavens that are usually the color of Roy’s golf sweater.

  8. gumby 08/15/2012 at 9:20 PM #

    U*NC doesn’t fall under the purview of the Middle States Commission of Higher Education – they are accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) – it’s a regional system for accreditation. And yes, SACS will most certainly have some pointed questions for U*NC. The drawback is that accreditation is a once-every-ten-years affair and U*NC is on a cycle for reaffirmation next in 2016…

    Noteworthy is this – per the SACS “Principles of Accreditation” is this about integrity: The Principle of Integrity – “1.1 The institution operates with integrity in all matters. (Integrity)” and “Failure of an institution to adhere to the integrity principle may result in a loss of accreditation or candidacy.”

    Now, no sane person can believe that U*NC will lose their accreditation, but it takes little effort to support the argument that they should….

  9. NCSU84 08/15/2012 at 9:44 PM #

    BOG believes:

    The flagship cannot be allowed to sink.

    If there is a hole in the flagship, plug it.

    If there is dirt on deck, find a mop to clean it up.

    If a sail is torn, stitch it together and sail on.

    The flagship cannot be allowed to sink.

  10. runwiththepack 08/16/2012 at 8:21 AM #

    Wufpacker,
    yes, my last statement was rather sarcastic, yet very possibly the actual ncaa approach just the same.

    Regarding what Adam Gold said, he was just stating how he interprets the NCAA position on such pesky things like gross academic fraud. He wasn’t stating what HE thinks the NCAA should do, but rather just paraphrasing what the ncaa has said on these matters as he understands it.

    I hope he’s mistaken. We have to consider also that the NCAA may have overstepped their bounds in the Penn St. matter, so that leaves the possibility that they will make up some more rules as they go along at Chapel HIll, too. (hopefully not in UNC’s favor)

    It seems perfectly obvious that UNC had (has?) a diploma mill going on in the African Studies program, but those “clever” UNC _____________ just took a squirrelly lawyer approach by adding in some chicks who want to meet jocks.

    Is that really all it takes to get the ncaa off your back for gross academic fraud? Just sprinkle in some jock sniffers with the phony jock classes? That’s exactly what happened at UNC if this doesn’t draw the NCAA’s wrath.

Leave a Reply