N & O: No-show classes mostly for athletes

Good morning!  The News and Observer has played Santa yet again.  Wait until you get a load of some of the bombshells in Kane’s latest front-page above-the-fold article that hit this morning.

The entire thing is a must-read.  Here are some explosive passages:

Students looking to enroll in a summer class at UNC-Chapel Hill taught by Julius Nyang’oro were likely to hit a roadblock as soon as they went online.

Of the 38 courses the university says he was responsible for over five summers, 26 of them listed a maximum capacity for just one student. For many students, that would be a sign to go look for another course.

But university records show more than one student enrolled in most of these courses. And often, a substantial share of those students were athletes.

and

There’s another wrinkle to all this. Nyang’oro, the former chairman of the African and Afro-American Studies department where all these courses were listed, did not get paid for 29 of these suspect summer classes. Typically, professors are paid per class because the work is considered beyond their normal nine-month work year.

Willis Brooks and Jay Smith, two UNC-CH history professors who are concerned about the case’s impact on the university’s academic integrity, said the enrollment and pay data suggest Nyang’oro had set up a system for athletes to get into classes they could pass.

“The only logic I can conjure is (Nyang’oro) was protecting seats,” said Brooks, a professor emeritus who served on the faculty athletic committee in the early 1990s. “And since the preponderance of people who took the seats are athletes, there is circumstantial evidence,” he said.

and

Current and former UNC-CH officials say they can’t recall a worse case of academic fraud at the university….. The investigation started with a suspicious transcript belonging to a former UNC football player. Top leaders at UNC-CH and the UNC system, however, say athletics weren’t at the heart of the academic fraud, because nonathletes were in the suspect classes, too.

But athletes and former athletes made up a majority of those enrolled in the suspect classes. The university says that athletes and former athletes made up 64 percent of the enrollments.

and

UNC records show that in addition to the courses he taught, Nyang’oro supervised independent studies without pay for another 60 students during those summer semesters; at least 22 were football players. The independent studies are also academically suspect, according to an internal review UNC-CH officials released last month.

The summer courses are among 75 linked to Nyang’oro over a four-year period. University officials said that is an extraordinary number for a professor, let alone a department chairman, to have responsibility for, but no one noticed until the fraud investigation began.

The hooligans over on PackPride have done a fantastic job keeping up with the scandal (and driving it in many cases).  Their instant analysis is often very useful.  This is a post from this morning pointing out the new ground this article breaks:
There is major new info in this article, including info that is new to this board:
– Nyang’oro “taught” many of the classes for free (at least officially)
– The 64% athlete/former athlete figure is new. 24 hours ago, what we knew was (iirc) 54% athlete, unknown % former athlete
– Strong circumstantial evidence exists that the same stuff was happening as long ago as 2001, based on class records
Stay tuned.
UNC Scandal

55 Responses to N & O: No-show classes mostly for athletes

  1. logarithm 07/08/2012 at 7:39 AM #

    Still circumstantial. Wish they’d compare the ratio of athletes to nonathletes in these classes to the ratio of athletes to nonathletes in the general population over there as well as that ratio during summer sessions. Still circumstantial but at least quantified. It’s not like the math is beyond us. SFN ran those numbers weeks ago.

  2. choppack1 07/08/2012 at 7:44 AM #

    logartithm – that’s pretty much been. The number here is that 64% are athletes or former athletes. I’d say the only place you can be surrounded by more athletes is to actually be on the field/court or locker room with them.

    Once you cross that 50% threshold, it doesn’t really matter. The other interesting question would be exactly who constituted the 36% of “non-athletes”.

  3. packbackr04 07/08/2012 at 8:18 AM #

    There is also a change in the verbiage the N/O is using. They are now saying “athletes” and not “football players” which was the previous term they were using. Perhaps a large # of men’s B-ball players were in these classes as well

  4. sjmac11 07/08/2012 at 8:47 AM #

    I’m not as educated nor up to date on this whole thing. Please correct me (and I’m sure someone will) but isn’t the official NCAA investigation over? Didn’t UNC slip by once again? If so, however entertaining to read how “dirty” the institution really is let’s MOVE ON! Let’s focus on bringing energy to Carter Finley this year, lets focus on beating the heels again. Let’s focus on dreaming of our offense running more than four plays this year. It is what it is about UNC, some things will never change.

  5. sequoyah 07/08/2012 at 9:19 AM #

    notice that the chapel-hill administrators quoted in the story try to set the table that Nyang’oro was acting alone.

    Well there are a lot of moving parts in this machine – the student-athletes, the ‘normal’ students, the professor, the Department staff and grad students, the College Dean, the Summer School Dean, the Registrar’s office, and the Cashier’s office, HR office. Seems like a glitch would have fouled the works somewhere of an institution that promotes itself as the ultimate learning experience.

    Keep digging, Dan Kane. Do not take the UNC statements at face value.

  6. wolfpackdawg 07/08/2012 at 9:37 AM #

    To think that he acted alone and own his own accord is laughable. I don’t see how the Holes will get away with that. Hopefully Nyang’oro will sing like a bird.

  7. wilmwolf80 07/08/2012 at 9:47 AM #

    I dunno, the Hill seems to have all of these people locked up tighter than a drum. Since all of this started, no interviews with Blake, no interviews with the tutor, very few interviews with Davis or the key players, and the good Dr. has been MIA since his name first came out. That’s what I want to know, where is the hush money coming from that has managed to keep all of these people silent??? In most cases, money leaves a trail, a trail that someone needs to follow.

  8. wolfpackdawg 07/08/2012 at 9:59 AM #

    He could have been provided a large sum of money for sure. He will certainly continue to be drug through the mud for a long time with this.

  9. TheAliasTroll 07/08/2012 at 10:31 AM #

    They need to put some asterisks beside two of those national championship banners hanging in the nose dome.

  10. old13 07/08/2012 at 10:33 AM #

    sjmac11, it’s true that the NCAA has completed the investigation started two years ago (so far as we know.) But there’s nothing to keep them from opening a new investigation, or reopening the old one, if new evidence is found concerning their jurisdiction.

  11. Pack78 07/08/2012 at 11:22 AM #

    I also like the fact that the N&O calls unx out in the headline ‘NO-SHOW CLASSES’…no chance for misinterpretation there much as the unx administration would like to spin it.

  12. mrwufabc 07/08/2012 at 11:42 AM #

    “The data show that 44 of the suspect classes listed the maximum seating at one student. Other university records show that 31 of these one-seat-maximum classes had majorities of athletes. Some of the information was first spotted by an N.C. State fan who posted it on a Wolfpack chat board.”
    This along with the plagiarized “arroved” paper, we’re getting a lot of the critical information. We are doing the work of the media. What can we do to get the 216 information? What is the status with that-anybody know? Also, everyone moved on about the parking tickets. Is there anybody still working on that issue? Perhaps its time for someone to lead this effort and organize our work to expose this.

  13. mrwufabc 07/08/2012 at 11:47 AM #

    I wrote this before when we had the official throw out Googs and Corchiani. I believe we have legit media status and have a seat at the table to ask the same questions the media does or in this case doesn’t. Who speaks for this blog? Who owns it? Can you start conducting interviews much like the media should be doing? The reason why I ask this, I happen to know that several websites now consider themselves as legitimate media and conduct investigative reporting.

  14. Hungwolf 07/08/2012 at 12:07 PM #

    And in the Dean Smith/UNC-CH tradition nothing has been self reported to the NCAA. Some say it is not a crime if you not caught, at UNC-CHest it not crime even if you are caught!

  15. golf76 07/08/2012 at 12:22 PM #

    “I happen to know that several websites now consider themselves as legitimate media and conduct investigative reporting,” mrwufabc

    SFN is a legitimate media outlet and you’d probably be surprised to know how many “sports reporters” get leads from this and similar sites. As for actively pursuing 216 records those records would have to be pursued through a freedom of information request (UNCX would say they are private records) but more likely through the courts or the SBI investigation. Most media outlets today don’t have the $$$ to fund that sort of activity. Way to costly and could drag out over a decade or longer. Do those records need to be part of this investigation? Yes. Will they? Not likely. It’s possible Julian Assange and WikiLeaks could get them but he’s got problems of his own.

  16. OldWolf76 07/08/2012 at 12:23 PM #

    RE: 216 phone

    I have plead for someone to expose the contents of the phone. What I have been told is that there is a court case involving the phone. I am sure UNC-cheat’s lawyers will delay as many years as possible.

  17. mrwufabc 07/08/2012 at 12:28 PM #

    What about the parking tickets and the changed plates? Anybody know if anything else is being done about it? I feel like that was something that was important last summer but we all just went past it. I feel there is something there. Ref: 216 case-who is suing for them? Is there a way to start a class action on behalf of the taxpayers?

  18. tuckerdorm1983 07/08/2012 at 12:43 PM #

    SHADOW CLASSES

    nothing says that the NCAA can’t reinvestigate because of new evidence. We could have round two of the NCAA investigation. Maybe they could put the whole athletics programs on a year or two ban from post season. Of these several dozen shadow class, I would love to see the roster of who took them and what grade they got. What would really be interesting is to see if any basketball players took this “shadow classes”. It looks like the Clusterf##k over there in Chapel Hill just keeps giving over and over again. I want to see a full list of people that took these classes. You know they will stonewall with protecting academic privacy. However, the spirit of academic privacy does not protect those engaged in fraud.

  19. Tau837 07/08/2012 at 1:13 PM #

    Still waiting to hear what UNC will do with the grades of the students in these suspect classes, particularly those classes where the professors identified as teaching them deny teaching them. How can those grades possibly be considered valid, when the university cannot identify professors who taught the courses? Unless the university can actually identify a professor who says he taught each of those classes and validates the grades submitted for the students in those classes, those grades and the credit hours for those classes should be removed from the records of the students.

    Of course, this opens up a number of issues. For example, students who graduated already using these credit hours would not actually have fulfilled the requirements for their degrees. What to do about that, make them return to take another course? Does the university take away their degrees?

    From an athletic standpoint, this also would likely mean some number of athletes would not have been eligible to compete when they did. That implies forfeiting wins, and maybe has financial implications (e.g., returning bowl money, or similar).

  20. TOBtime 07/08/2012 at 1:25 PM #

    The pressure behind the dam continues to build one drop at a time. It isn’t fast like a flood but the damage done by the overall pressure making the dam rupture will be the same.

    I sort of like it taking a while. It means there is more time to uncover stones as well as people to get nervous and talk. I fully believe someone IS going to talk eventually. There are too many involved.

    Keep it coming Dan.

  21. mrwufabc 07/08/2012 at 1:32 PM #

    Ref degree in Tau837-To answer your question. Yes a university can take back your degree if you are found to have completed the degree under fraudulent terms. There are multiple cases where this has happened. I wouldn’t hold my breath as unc-CHeat’s style is to deflect, deny, spin, repeat. unc-CHeat could go a long way in restoring some integrity if they did take back the degree in those cases, but I don’t see it happening.

  22. OldWolf76 07/08/2012 at 1:44 PM #

    RE: 216 suit
    It was my understanding that it was filed by media outlets.

    The 216 phone contains records of UNC-CH business. Davis never used his UNC paid for cell phone or desk phone to make calls. No calls. NONE.

    Yet, he must have called his assistants, RECRUITS, AD, secretaries, Deans, Univ President, opposing coaches, etc. None of those calls came from UNC cell or desk phones. Where did they come from? The 216!

    Butch is claiming that the 216 was personal and for personal business and as such not a part of UNC open records laws.

    Fine! GO to the UNC paid phones for the Prez, Deans, Assistants, secretaries, etc (all public records) and see if the 216 number show up and how often.

    Then go back to Butch and say “we have found X thousand calls from the 216 phone and have proved that it was used for your activities as an public employee! Surrender the records!”

  23. MattN 07/08/2012 at 3:20 PM #

    Prof. Julius is not going to teach 29 summer courses for $0. SOMEONE paid him. Who? Nike? Agents? Coaches?

    Perhaps he didn’t teach them AT ALL?

    Which one is worse?

  24. vtpackfan 07/08/2012 at 3:40 PM #

    Nike. Non profit group run by Carolina grad in Nairobi slums. Great scheme for laundering money. SBI, nor anylike entity can trace. Maybe a journalist with some close associations, but thats a long shot.

    My question is why would people go to such ridiculously notion just to hang banners. Ive witnessed years of athletic purgatory that is highlighted by X-Country excellence and Bass tourney crowns. Life is still cool without banners and burning capsized cars on Franklin Street.

  25. blpack 07/08/2012 at 4:32 PM #

    UNC-cheat = win at all costs, but make it look like we are Harvard.
    However even the academics have sold out to winning and forsaking academic integrity.

Leave a Reply