NC State Erases Racers, 65-7 (w/ Video Highlights)

In a game not even as close as the final score, the Wolfpack ran completely roughshod over the Division I-AA Murray State Racers this evening in Carter-Finley Stadium.  With the first string Wolfpack defense in the game, Murray State was only capable of a single first down in the first half, and have -2 yards total offense.  NC State, on the other hand, scored the first ten times it had the ball, punting only once in the game, in the fourth quarter.

Doubts about Russell Wilson’s health seemed to be put to rest as the sophomore QB ran elusively and smoothly — on the few occasions he needed to escape the Murray State defense.  Most of the game, the offensive line vilified after the South Carolina game provided adequate protection and time for Wilson, who threw for 228 yards and four touchdown passes.

Wilson also extended his interception-free streak to 293 passes, moving him into second place in NCAA history.  The record is held by former Kentucky quarterback Andre Woodson and is 325 consecutive pass attempts without an INT.  That leaves Wilson 32 passes shy of the record, making it possible for him to hold the record all on his own within the next two games — both at home.

Photo courtesy of News & Observer/Ethan Hyman

Photo courtesy of News & Observer/Ethan Hyman

Another highlight of the evening was the success of Wolfpack tailback, Toney Baker, who scored three touchdowns on the night – two rushing and one receiving. Baker generated over 100 yards in total offense by gaining 74 yards rushing on just 12 carries and scoring on a 39 yard touchdown for his only reception of the game. The N&O’s picture gallery can be seen by clicking here.

 

Although it did not score its own points, the NC State defense put the Wolfpack into scoring position on Murray State’s first two possessions, after Leroy Burgess recovered Murray State fumbles. On special teams, speedster T.J. Graham returned a punt for 57 yards to the Murray State 1-yard line, setting up another point-blank drive for the Wolfpack.

Video From The Game:

James Washington Scores a TD

Redshirt Freshman Brandon Barnes Makes a Nice 9-Yard Gain:

And on the next play, Barnes scored:

Some comments from Backing the Pack:

— Murray State had as many drives gain zero or negative yardage as they did drives that gained positive yardage. They managed more than four plays on a drive just once–at 13-play march late in the game that resulted in their only score.

— For the game, the Racers 36 total yards (1 rushing yard) on 45 plays.

— Murray State possessed the ball for less than 25 minutes; longest time of possession in a quarter: 6 minutes, 50 seconds.

— NC State, meanwhile, restored as much confidence offensively as is possible against this sort of opponent. Four hundred and eighty-four yards on 77 plays (6.3 yds/play), 4 yards per carry, 10.1 yards per pass attempt.

— NC State’s average field position for the game was the Murray State 48 yard line.

— The Pack converted 9-of-14 third downs and converted all eight of their red zone scoring opportunities.

— Toney Baker ran for 74 yards and a pair of scores and also scored on a nice 39-yard screen pass.

— Eleven different Wolfpack receivers caught a pass.

— Starting the wave while NC State is on offense: still a problem.

'09 Football

58 Responses to NC State Erases Racers, 65-7 (w/ Video Highlights)

  1. highstick 09/13/2009 at 7:43 PM #

    LRM, what you said is the PC version of Division II! I hate that term cause they are second class, not matter how you cut it!

  2. ncsu0812 09/13/2009 at 8:06 PM #

    The wave normally starts in the 7/8 student section. Last night, when it was first started, a number of students in the Student Wolfpack Club Section tried to stop it since we were on offense. Apparently the 7/8 students didn’t get the point when hardly anyone in section 6 participated. They proceeded to send the in the other direction and unfortunately were successful as Mike Glennon marched down the field in pursuit of his first collegiate TD pass (which was not completed and IIRC, that is the drive when we kicked the field goal). Hopefully the rest of the students will soon realize that the wave is a big distraction when we are on O. IMO, we shouldn’t do it on defense either, because it takes away from the roar that is Carter-Finley when the D is on the field. I’ve never been a huge fan of the wave, but I admit that CFS looks pretty awesome when we get a good one going. If we want to start a wave, start it between the 1st and 2nd quarter.

  3. Wulfpack 09/13/2009 at 9:17 PM #

    I’m not going to say the Pitt game is pivotal. Wha it is really is our last chance to impress out of conference. ACC pride will be on the line. But it’s not “pivotal” because we aren’t a BCS team unless we win the conference championship anyways. Surely it’s a big game, but the USC game, IMHO, was bigger, and we fell short. Given that the division appears to be up for grabs, it’s our conference games that are truly “pivotal”, not Pitt. We could forseeably win 5 games and find ourselves with a chance of a BCS game if we play our cards right.If you beat Pitt, you still have to fare well in the conference games for this to be a truly meaningful season.

  4. 61Packer 09/13/2009 at 9:52 PM #

    I agree with Wulfpack, it’s the conference games that are pivotal moreso than the nonconference games. I’d rather lose the SC and Pitt games if it helps us move up toward the top of the Atlantic Division. I had a bellyfull of games where we’d beat teams like Texas and then lose to teams like Baylor (MOC and CTC).

    I still think we’ll have a decent season, maybe 6-6 or even 7-5, but until Russell Wilson is turned loose on the pitch, I just don’t see us going to a higher level than we did last season. To me, we’ve lost our element of surprise as long as Wilson stays in the pocket.

  5. tjfoose1 09/13/2009 at 9:54 PM #

    rdjennin – dude, there is a huge difference, HUGE, between FCS (Div 1AA) and DivII. Did I say HUGE?

    Top FCS programs: App State, Delaware, Richmond, Montana
    Top DivII programs: Grand Valley, Pittsburg St (KS), Valdosta St, Abilene Christian

    As far as using the SoCar vs UGA game to benchmark our defense/offense… IMHO it is meaningless.

    The steepest learning curve in a season is always between games 1 and 2. I wouldn’t put too much stock in our defense by comparing it to UGA’s defensive performance against SoCar. Nor would I be too concerned about our RW and crew after UGA’s offensive output against SoCar.

    If NC State and SoCar were to play again next week, the game would bear little resemblance to the game played on Sept 3rd.

    I disagree with BJD somewhat, but only because I believe 5-3 can potentially win the Atlantic this year. If we win the Atlantic and go to Tampa, doesn’t thank make us “ACC Contenders” by definition? But we agree in principal.

    For what it’s worth, I’m counting wins against Wake, Duke, BC (while admitting a loss to any/all 3 is possible). Also think we should beat Maryland, but they always seem to give us problems. FSU should be favored, as will Clemson and Va Tech. UNC I put as a toss up at this point, due to it being a rivalry game and we have a whole season to play before we get to that game… The UNC and State teams that play on Nov 28 will not be the teams that played Saturday.

    4-4 in conference is realistic, as is 5-3. 4-2 or 5-1 will take both luck and lots of improvement.

    That being said, we certainly are due some luck, and TOB & staff have proven quite capable of delivering in-season improvement.

  6. LRM 09/13/2009 at 9:54 PM #

    “LRM, what you said is the PC version of Division II! I hate that term cause they are second class, not matter how you cut it!”

    What on earth is PC about correcting an inaccurrate statement about Murray State being Division II when in fact they are Division I?

    Saying they are Division II shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the structure of NCAA football (which is quite common, just like those who don’t realize there is no I-AA in NCAA basketball). Division I is seperated into two subdivisions, I-A/FBS and I-AA/FCS: UNC-Pembroke, Carson-Newman and Catawba are each examples of Division II schools; Appalachian State, Elon, and Richmond are each FCS/I-AA, which is still Division I (sometimes State resembles one).

    It has nothing to do with being PC, it is a statement of fact.

  7. rdjennin 09/13/2009 at 11:28 PM #

    I said they will always be division 2 to me, because to me, if your not in Division 1-FBS, then you are just division 2. period. Most people refer to Division 1-FCS as being division 2, because, they are second tier, there is the division that everyone cares about, and then there is everybody else.

    Christmas!! I refer to NCSU as State, even though I understand that they are North Carolina State University — Raleigh. State could refer to many things, like florida state or ohio state or utah state. But I call NCSU state. Because to me, there is only one “State” and that is our very own NCSU.

    So if you get offended that when I say “State” that it doesn’t refer to somebody’s alma mater, or when I say division 2, that you in someway find it demeaning to your alma mater. It’s just my biased slang, I’m an inconsiderate B@$T@RD, not a friggin idiot.

  8. cooldrip 09/14/2009 at 12:43 AM #

    For those who don’t believe the Pitt game is pivotal, a loss makes a 5-3 ACC record the MINIMUM to achieve bowl eligibility. If we lose and finish 4-4 in conference, our record in terms of bowl eligibility will be 4-6, with ONE of the FCS wins counting, but not both. Thus, we would be 5-6 and ineligible because of our losing record. IMO the Pitt game is a must win.

  9. Wulfpack 09/14/2009 at 5:30 AM #

    If it comes down to that, I’m not really all that concerned with making a bowl game anyways. The extra practice is nice, but we should be better this year than just barely squeaking in like last year.

  10. waxhaw 09/14/2009 at 6:30 AM #

    The people that I know who refer to FCS as Division II don’t realize there’s a difference(or made a mistake) between the old 1AA and Division II.

  11. McCallum 09/14/2009 at 6:33 AM #

    How in the hell did SC score 37 against Georgia?

    I made my first game at CF in 5 years and the cowboy boots and sundress have made their way to Raleigh from Athens. Stadium looks nice, 1975 had a sign up asking for its hair style back, and some old jokes never fail to garner laughter.

    I noticed lots of true freshman playing the other night. I also noticed that Kuhn did not touch the field. Is he hurt, is he that bad, are the people in front of him that good?

    See you again in 5 years.

    McCallum

  12. wolfonthehill 09/14/2009 at 7:31 AM #

    “If NC State and SoCar were to play again next week, the game would bear little resemblance to the game played on Sept 3rd.”

    Which is exactly why I think opening up with a Murray State, THEN taking on USuC in Game 2, is an infinitely better plan than what we did. I understand exposure, national TV, and all that… but I’m certain that the past 2 games against the Cocks did more harm than good for the national reputation of our program.

    And we DID learn some things Saturday. We learned that we don’t suck… we may not be great (that cannot be learned against a I-AA team), but we don’t suck.

    We learned yet again that Owen Spencer could be one of the best receivers in the nation if he would just hang onto the easy ones. His ability to get open consistently is shocking.

    We learned that our offensive coaching staff is not uber-conservative. Under some regimes, this game would’ve been a time to just pound it mercilessly, play conservatively on offense, and take zero shots downfield. I continue to be VERY happily surprised by Dana Bible and his approach to game-calling.

    We learned that none of our RB’s are currently as good as Andre was last year… but Washington looked again like someone who needs 10+ touches per game. The speed he brings is truly a change of pace.

    Probably learned more… but I’m not a kid anymore, so I forgot it over the past 36 hours. 😉

    Edited to add that I learned that Rashard Smith didn’t just look like a bad-ass for one game. I want him on the field a lot – with the ball in his hands in whatever way it’s possible. That kid’s an absolute playmaker, on either side of the ball.

  13. Classof89 09/14/2009 at 9:13 AM #

    Was anyone else a little surprised to see Russell Wilson coming back on the field after halftime? We would have felt really foolish had he injured himself on that first drive of the 2nd half…

  14. choppack1 09/14/2009 at 9:40 AM #

    Class of 89 – It sounds to me like this game was about righting some wrongs from the USC game. I suppose we could have pulled all of our starters, but I was impressed w/ the total domination of an inferior opponent.

  15. wolfonthehill 09/14/2009 at 10:15 AM #

    I think it was pretty questionable to have anyone in after it was well in-hand… hope it didn’t cost us Clem Johnson.

  16. McPete 09/14/2009 at 10:44 AM #

    wolfonthehill,
    the starting D was barely out there in the first half, so they needed some more reps. Seriously they had like 12 plays or something like that.

    Also,
    Owen Spencer getting open alot had more to do with murray state’s blitzing and blowing coverages more than anything else. Everyone was getting open. Murray State was bringing alot of blitzes that were getting picked up. Once, as TOB pointed out on his Tv show, they actually double teamed our fullback. on a touchdown pass, they triple teamed George Bryan on a blitz no less. they were an inept team, and i wouldn’t expect many more of those.

  17. howlie 09/14/2009 at 10:59 AM #

    QUESTION for the group:

    Let’s SUPPOSE that we lose the Pitt game, but run the table on the conference opponents and win the ACC Championship game [that’s quite an assumption, I know].

    WILL IT, then, have made any difference that we lost to both USC & Pitt… or is our bowl bid ‘automatic,’ regardless of those two OOC losses? In other words, will our ‘likely opponent’ and/or bowl likely CHANGE because of losses to USC & Pitt?
    Thx

  18. Sw0rdf1sh 09/14/2009 at 11:32 AM #

    If you win the Championship game your bid is automatic anyway, but based on your scenario….and the amounts of wins we have versus losses (2 losses?)we are automatic. Now losing to Murray State and GW might have made that outcome different….but at least we won’t be seeing that scenario.

  19. StateofthePack 09/14/2009 at 12:40 PM #

    ACC Champion gets automatic bid to the Orange Bowl this year. Out of conference results don’t figure into the selection process. Orange Bowl has been affiliated with the ACC/ Big East champions for a few years now.

  20. wolfonthehill 09/14/2009 at 1:26 PM #

    The only way it would matter is if those 2 losses kept us out of a national championship conversation. But we’re a long way from that being a factor, so nothing to see there…

  21. Plz2BStateFan 09/14/2009 at 1:27 PM #

    The next two games are reset games.

    Murray State was exercising our demons from the USC game.

    Gardner Webb will be regaining our confidence.

    Pitt will be a huge game just to see where we are, let alone a must for making sure we get to a bowl game.

    I loved to see all the 2nd and 3rd stringers out there. Will be looking forward to the injury report on the Thursday before Pitt.

  22. rtpack24 09/14/2009 at 2:41 PM #

    It was great to see the team come out focused and ready to play. Pitt game is very important game for the season, recruiting etc.

  23. Alpha Wolf 09/14/2009 at 3:14 PM #

    “I also noticed that Kuhn did not touch the field. Is he hurt, is he that bad, are the people in front of him that good? ”

    Underwood and Kuhn are being redshirted.

  24. PhilipRiversWannabe 09/14/2009 at 3:36 PM #

    “I also noticed that Kuhn did not touch the field. Is he hurt, is he that bad, are the people in front of him that good? ”

    Underwood and Kuhn are being redshirted.

    Good. I was wondering about that myself. Smart move by the coaching staff. Save up some depth for the next 2 years. We have plenty of running backs who deserve playing time and due to the fact that we have 4 senior D-Lineman starting and some upperclassmen in the two deep, this will leave us with some experience at these positions for the next 2 seasons.

  25. tjfoose1 09/14/2009 at 3:41 PM #

    Our offense, and team as a whole still need a lot of work, that is why Wilson and the entire starting units played a few series in the 2nd half.

    As I’ve been saying here for a while… Rashard Smith is a future stud! He might be a 3 year guy.

    I too noticed Kuhn on the sidelines… my seats are 15 rows up, 48 yd line, right behind the Wolfpack bench. I’ve noticed that Kuhn has not played a down in 2009.

    Since clearly every active player would have logged some playing time Saturday, and Kuhn is not on the injury reports, we must conclude that the plan is to redshirt Kuhn.

    That seems logical since:
    1) Kuhn is a former starter and Sporting News Freshman All-American – so obviously he has the talent to play.

    2) We are currently loaded w/ depth on the DL.

    3) All four DL starters are Seniors, so depth will be more of a concern next year.

    4)Kuhn is a ‘raw’ talent, relying heavily on physical ability and short on skill and technique. Kuhn came from Germany, and didn’t start playing football until he was 15. A redshirt year for the true Jr is the perfect Rx to further develop his skill and technique.

Leave a Reply