statusquOblinger finds part of his memory on Monday

Alternative title: NC State’s 63 year old Chancellor publicly admits to losing his edge and forgetting important information

Cartoon from Charlotte Observer

NC State University Chancellor, Jim statusquOblinger asked Mary Easley to resign her University post on Monday after (deservedly) coming under significant criticism for the University’s handling of Easley’s hiring and pay.  The former North Carolina first lady is the second University employee that Oblinger has targeted after he sent the Provost packing in a feeble attempt to absolve himself of ownership of key decisions on his campus.

At this point it is a fair question to ask – if Mary Easley should resign, then why on earth shouldn’t Jim Oblinger? Easley has done NOTHING that wasn’t asked of her by Oblinger and the administration he leads. She was hired under Oblinger; she got her raise under Oblinger; and she has been doing whatever Oblinger’s administration has asked. If she should resign because it is ‘best for NC State’, then please explain why her boss who is responsible for the entire situation not also be expected to resign?

Link to WRAL’s story

Link to N&O’s story

Oblinger’s status quo style, general lack of leadership and avoidance of anything remotely resembling conflict is now serving to haunt the former food chemist.  (You know how NC State aims high for leadership!  From food chemist to Chancellor of a Research One University.  Gotta love reaching for the stars in West Raleigh!!!).  During this past weekend, the N&O’s “Under the Dome” blog took Oblinger to task in this entry that is very embarrassing to the Chancellor and the entire University.

N.C. State Chancellor James Oblinger says he is "embarrassed" that he has no recollection of a conversation with trustee McQueen Campbell prior to the hiring of first lady Mary Easley in 2005.

For good reason.

Some might recall that an often-noted trait of N.C. State’s 13th chancellor has been his steel-trap memory, Andy Curliss reports.

It was highlighted in a lengthy profile of Oblinger in The News & Observer at the time he took the chancellorship in early 2005, noting that he devoured details and that his ability to remember names and faces was "uncanny."

The profile said that he was the kid who memorized which recording belonged to what record label. He was the dad who remembered the odometer reading on his car, much to his sons’ dismay because they couldn’t drive off and return without his knowing it.

"He will know whether there were crumbs left on the kitchen counter when he walks out in the morning," his wife said at the time. "If there are different crumbs in that spot when he returns, he notices that, too."

Faculty members have also recalled that Oblinger could pick up a conversation weeks or even months after it started, as if there was no gap in time.

But on Thursday, in addressing questions about Campbell and the first lady’s hiring, Oblinger said his memory is now faulty.

"You’ve got to realize that I’m getting older," said Oblinger, who is 63. "This was years ago. I find that I’m forgetting things."

If you are just now coming to the realization that you need to be paying attention to this story, then this little article from the N&O will quickly catch you up on the recent timeline of events while appropriately criticizing NC State’s (lack of) response to the issue. 

Oblinger has now reached a point where he is completely boxed-in with anything that he says; every time he opens his mouth he is in a ‘no win’ situation.

  • This weekend, it was a 63 year old man admitting that he has lost his edge and is ‘getting older’ and that he finds “(he is) forgetting things.”
  • Last week, he was either (a) incompetently disengaged from very important decisions on his campus or (b) obviously hiding things. A couple of our community members said it quite succinctly last week:

If he claims that he didn’t know about the quid pro quo that has apparently taken place, then sheer ignorance of a very high profile hire would be grounds for removal. If he claims that he did, in fact know, then he was, at the very least, complicit and also ground for removal.

I think Oblinger is flat out lying, or he is extremely stupid. A man in his position I would hope couldn’t be that dumb, but you never know.

This is what happens to people who do not any true convictions and passively ‘manage’ by avoidance and without driving to reach stretch goals.  If the Chancellor and the folks at NC State were actually executing against a well-defined strategy, then all behaviors under that strategy can/could be explained and justified as supporting that strategy.  But, when the bulk of your daily behaviors are construed by everyone around you as ‘risk avoidance’ and wanting to ‘do as little as possible to upset the status quo’, then you cannot truly strive for excellence or have any guiding barometer for decisions.

For example, why not actually defend the Mary Easley hire a little?  Regardless of any potential quid pro quo between McQueen Campbell and the Easley family, hiring Mary Easley is actually a very good thing for NC State.  Had Oblinger taken a stand and supported/promoted the importance of Mary Easley’s role in leading the Millennium Speaker Series he would at least have a position staked as opposed to appearing lost like a deer in the headlights.  But, Oblinger didn’t have enough control of these issues from the start after NC State promoted Larry Neilsen from his campus position to Provost in an unconventional move that ultimately ignored a formal external search process that had identified four candidates for the position.

You see – it is all about being comfortable with the status quo all around you in Raleigh.  Why would NC State dare bring in someone from the outside when the Chancellor can live in luxury along side his local buddy?  Of course, you can’t really blame Chancellor Oblinger; it is the ‘NC State way’ to ultimately promote a food chemist from campus into the steward and leader of the entire University after the ‘good old boys’ and the tenured faculty had been pushed by someone who actually had drive and ambition to leave the zip code every now and then (Marye Ann Fox).

Unfortunately, the folks in West Raleigh just are not built to chart courses with clearly stated goals and outcomes.  This is why Lee Fowler can continue to keep his job despite the laughter of so many involved in college athletics today.  In the words of another of our insightful posters:

What you see in how poorly all these items have been handled is classic NC State. Head down, plowing forward (any direction really) with little or no concern as to how it might look and no consideration in the prior as to how things might shake out. Thus, NC State just does it and the chips fall where they might. As I was told long ago, State does not practice risk management, they practice risk avoidance. They have no idea that things will go wrong and when they do go wrong, as things will when people are involved, they over react or in this case they look terribly corrupt and inept.

Link to extended interview with Mary Easley from WRAL-TV

Link to new NC State fight song.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

NC State Administration

38 Responses to statusquOblinger finds part of his memory on Monday

  1. bradleyb123 05/19/2009 at 9:55 AM #

    “To reform the University would take a sweeping away of a group of entrenched eggheads who think a university is a place for only academic pursuits with little or no regard for a well-balanced institution which values academics as well as athletics.”

    I think you’re right. What gets me is how can a group of people that are supposedly INTELLIGENT not see the value in having strong athletics as well as academics? IMO, it makes them seem less intelligent.

  2. StateFans 05/19/2009 at 10:06 AM #

    ‘Intelligence’ and an ability to understand how the real world operates are two very different things.

  3. legacyman 05/19/2009 at 11:39 AM #

    There are different levels/types of intelligence. Some folks are brilliant students of some special topic such as math or economics, etc. Some folks are brilliant at working with people. Some are great teachers. Some are great leaders such as a top general or a corporate CEO who is ethical and successful(I know, a rarity). Some are well-schooled in the street.

    Very few people have mastered more than one or two of these areas. I have known many people who were very intellectual and cared not one whit for athletics. I have also known many who did like sports so who knows.

    I remember from Jimmy V’s days that some of the egghead types(not all of them) were extremely jealous of Jim’s ability to earn a few extra bucks from speaking appearances. He made maybe two or three times their salaries so they were peed about it. For some reason they never talked about dean smith or mike k., each of which made much more money than Coach V.

    There are some University people who like sports for there are some loyal profs on the athletics board.

  4. old13 05/19/2009 at 1:11 PM #

    IMO the BOT should now request JO’s resignation.

  5. ldr of the pk 75 05/19/2009 at 2:05 PM #

    How weak is it, anyway, that the Chancellor of the University has to ASK one of the underlings to resign. What happened to the old days when management made decisions? Even if the wrong hire was made in those days, it was cut short if for no other reason than they were the boss.

    Ah, but today, lawyers, tenure, money, cronies, etc, etc., and real management can’t happen. They’re all cancer and need to be cut out. Will thhe good ole boys will work it out in the back room or under the table? Stay tuned, news at 11.

  6. StateFans 05/19/2009 at 2:25 PM #

    The question remains — is she going to resign? And, is she going to resign without a buyout? If you are going to have to pay her the obligated contract, why would you bother wanting her to resign.

    If the truth the be told — Mary Easley has done more for NC State in two years of making that $160K+ than Lee Fowler has done for NC State in ten years of making $260K+.

    But, of course, we don’t hire or fire based on performance or results. Strictly based on politics, baby.

  7. GoldenChain 05/19/2009 at 3:20 PM #

    Well the Chairman of the BoT has gone, the Provost is gone, and even Erskine has deserted Mrs Sleazly. So naturally the Chancellor deserts last.
    And yes, I have a hard time believing that the temp-Provost, who was not a candidate but became a candidate AND, got the job over 4 others after he hired Sleazly’s wife could have happened WITHOUT the knowledge of the Chancellor.

    This should be a lesson that holes (Sleazly, and Bowles) are NEVER to be trusted, you always end up with a knife in your back (Mr. Nieslen, Mr. Campbell, …and Dr. Oblinger….).

    Oblinger needs to go and most likely will as the Feds are getting involved.

  8. Otis 05/19/2009 at 6:29 PM #

    Regardless of how she got the job or how much she got paid, she has done a great job with the Millennium Seminars, I wish I had been able to go to more of them. For those who don’t know what it is, here is the site – http://www.ncsu.edu/millenniumseminars/ , they have had top notch speakers on very interesting and relevant topics. She was in charge of finding the speakers, I am willing to wager that her political connections made it easier in getting some of these speakers to come to NC State. I was against the idea of her getting a job and the type of pay she got, that was until I found out what it was that she was doing. Although I am no longer a student, I was for many of the speakers, I think that she has shown that she did deserve the job, and showed outstanding performance after being hired. I know that this may take a bite out off many peoples argument, but I think this is a case of a mountain being made out of a mole hill. This is starting to reek of a witch hunt. I know that many of you think this is an opportunity to have Oblinger removed (whom I have no love for), but I think the university would suffer if Easly was forced to resign. Just check out the list of speakers, you will find that she was worth the money putting together a list of lecturers that she has. I find it strange that this part of the story has been omitted by the local media. This smacks of anti-NC State bias in the media more than any sports stories.

  9. McCallum 05/19/2009 at 7:35 PM #

    “We need to see if Jim Barker from Clemson would be interested in coming up to Raleigh. He has done one hell of a job there, is a communicative leader and consensus builder, understands the unique mission of a land grant school, has dramatically improved their endowment, led them to a national ranking of #21 among National Public Universities (was in the low 40s when he got the job), and has a real competitive fire when it comes to athletics.”-Dogbreath

    To bring in a guy like Barker would be a massive mistake.

    1) He does not understand the historic mission of a land grant. Clemson has down graded all of its agricultural sciences (horticulture, agronomy, biology, agricultural engineering, poultry science is actually gone as a major, etc). It is now in the business of turning out a few engineers, business majors and education majors.

    2) Almost all endowments improved in the last 10 years and almost all endowments have taken a major hit in the last 2 years. Did he hire their major gifts officer or was that person in place prior to him coming in……………that is the type of question you should be asking.

    3) I interviewed with a Clemson board trustee a few years back. He was not very keen on Barker due to his mindless goal of wanting to be noted by US News and World Report as one of their top public universities. Mind you, the criteria that US News measures the quality of a public institution is not all out in the open as one factor is the willingness of the institution in question to provide benefits for homosexual couples.(a major point of contention for Clemson board members BTW) The institution is gay friendly then it gets good marks, it is measured not to be so it gets bad marks.

    This drive is an effort to attract more out of state students who will bring in more cash and supposedly raise the profile of Clemson. Clemson has little to note in the realm of academics, no offense to Clemson folks, so this is one of Barkers efforts to basically change the dynamic of the school.

    4) Barker has instituted a freshmen cultural orientation program to teach sensitivity and this is due to the fallout from the PRIVATE OFF CAMPUS blackface party. The items taught: tolerance of gender, sexual orientation, race, etc………………all hallmarks of cultural Marxism and the academic left. This has resulted in some backlash on campus and among the alumni.

    5) Clemson has consistently fallen in athletics since Barker came to campus. They are no long strong in golf, soccer, baseball (up swing this year), track, etc. Under prior leadership Clemson dominated many non-revenue sports but since Barker they have declined across the board.

    Barker would be a gosh awful choice.

    And another damn thing: the university does not require all this LEADERSHIP you people are talking up. It needs common sense, class and a humble style. Every fool that takes on a big position seems to point out that LEADERSHIP is needed when in all truth what is really needed seems to be a good ethical management style. The endless banter about LEADERSHIP misses the problem the university stands in at this point and that concerns honest knowledge of how departments run, various by-laws of the university, a willingness to be vertically integrated on what the makes the university runs smoothly (physical plant, structure, goals, focus, and public relations). So long as the chancellor works within the basic principles of honesty, common sense and the goal of serving the people of North Carolina by providing quality research, extension and teaching then most anyone could steer the damn ship.

    All the fancy pants talk about leadership totally misses the point and if you do not watch it you’ll have another big talking chancellor who was trying to grab up departmental grant monies (like Fox was trying).

    That is all.

    McCallum

  10. sautz 05/20/2009 at 8:33 AM #

    Chancellor Oblivious was on the news last night saying he will not resign. At least someone had the balls to ask.
    With all this ****storm going around you’d have to think it’s good news for Fowler so far. Firing him must have dropped towards the bottom of the cleanup list.

  11. highstick 05/20/2009 at 9:07 AM #

    Thanks, McCallum, I couldn’t have said it that good myself about Clempson. I think they’ve adopted the UNCX model also with the emphasis on out of state students.

    I wish we’d just go ahead and do a major housecleaning and get rid of all of these “anchors” that keep dragging us down.

  12. Oldwolf 05/20/2009 at 9:52 AM #

    Oblinger and Nielson are being called to testify in a Federal Grand Jury on some the things that were going on with Mary Easley. Apparently, some portion of her salary was being paid from private funds that she was raising – which is being portrayed as a possible conflict of interest, since her husband was the govenor

    Also North Carolina State University’s Board of Trustees will hold a meeting at 5:15 p.m. today to determine who should be the new chairman.

    Who will be the new chairman?

    I also saw him on the news stating that he will not resign (Oblinger) – I am wondering how he can survive?

  13. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 05/20/2009 at 10:36 AM #

    Otis, looks like a very leftist group of people and the only Republican is a moderate. I would hardly say this woman was doing a good job unless her job is to indoctrinate young people into the dark and angry world of liberalism which very well may be the reason for her hire.

    Previous Speakers:

    * Bill Clinton
    * Myles Brand
    * Bill Bradley
    * Donna Shalala
    * Robert Reich
    * Charlie Rose
    * Rear Admiral Kenneth P. Moritsugu, M.D.,
    * Dr. Waleed Abdalati
    * Chris Viehbacher
    * Lindsey Graham
    * David Gergen
    * Ken Thompson

Leave a Reply