Et tu, Jim Calhoun? (Update: NCAA Investigation Coming)

“Quite frankly, we bring in $12 million to the university, nothing to do with state funds,” UConn Head Coach Jim Calhoun shouted at a reporter back in February, when he was asked about being the high paid employee of the Commonwealth of Connecticut. “We make $12 million a year for this university. Get some facts and come back and see me … Don’t throw out salaries and other things.”

That was a classic Jim Calhoun tirade, riding on a high horse and berating a reporter for questioning him. And now, facts may turn out to be Calhoun’s undoing, albeit on another matter, and it looks like another reporter has uncovered unimpeachable evidence of something rotten in Storr, Connecticut.

As Calhoun and his Husky team as prepares for their berth in the NCAA Sweet 16 comes news that UConn may have committed recruiting violations  chasing former guard Nate Miles that are so serious that not even the money-savvy NCAA can turn a blind eye.  Dan Wetzel:

[Nate] Miles was provided with lodging, transportation, restaurant meals and representation by Josh Nochimson – a professional sports agent and former UConn student manager – between 2006 and 2008, according to multiple sources. As a representative of UConn’s athletic interests, Nochimson was prohibited by NCAA rules from having contact with Miles and from providing him with anything of value.

A UConn assistant coach said he made Nochimson aware of the Huskies’ recruitment of Miles. Later, the assistant coach said he knew that Nochimson and Miles had talked.

The relationship and UConn’s knowledge of the situation are potential major NCAA violations.

Read Wetzel’s article, and look at the embedded evidence he presents.  This is not a hearsay case, instead it is one with phone records, facts and a solid presentation of them.

To put it mildly, Calhoun may be in deep water.  In my opinion, it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

UPDATE 1:

Source: NCAA To Probe UConn

Sports Illustrated.com reported earlier Thursday on its Web site that according to a source, a member of the NCAA’s amateurism and agents staff made contact with UConn officials to request that the school conduct its own investigation. According to that report, the source said that the NCAA would not decide whether to launch its own probe of UConn until the school reported back its own findings.

But a source with direct knowledge of the process told ESPN.com that decisions on how to proceed with the case have already been made. Due to the potential for major NCAA violations as detailed in the story, the body’s enforcement staff will take the lead in the investigation, rather than its eligibility staff or its agents, amateurism and gambling staff.

The source said that the university didn’t have a choice in whether to pursue an investigation, saying that it is the obligation of the member and the NCAA to conduct a probe, based on the depth of information contained in the Yahoo! Sports report.

NCS Basketball Quotes of Note

41 Responses to Et tu, Jim Calhoun? (Update: NCAA Investigation Coming)

  1. Greywolf 03/26/2009 at 4:56 PM #

    INMNSHO there is a lot about hockey that other sports could learn. It’s a rare occurance that a hockey player protests a call. Why? the player doesn’t want a double dose of penalty. When the protesting is done, it’s done surreptitiously. The referees have zero tolerance for unsportsman like conduct. If hockey type attitudes prevailed, Duke players would draw technical fouls for flops, interference calls would abound for the boys in baby blue for stepping into players going around screens.
    `
    Impressed with some dude taking a charge? I’d take charges all day before I’d lay down on the ice to stop one slap shot. Hockeys version of clutching and grabbing is “hooking.” Hooking is using your stick to interfer with the progress of a player or using your stick on at the hands level. Hooking is not to be confused with slashing, striking another player across the hands with your stick. It’s legal to hit a player from behind (or from the front) if he is in possesion of the puck or recently released it. This occurs from 50 to 60 times a game.
    `
    What wouldn’t work would be to require a team to play a man short until a goal is scored. Or maybe it would. If hockey referees officiated basketball games, there wouldn’t be an ACC coach to last more than 10 minutes a game before getting a “T”
    `
    I got my wife season tickets 3 years ago and got hooked. We go to about 30 games a year. This is the first time in my 45 years of being married to 2 women 3 times (don’t ask) that either one has ever come home with tickets to a game without me asking or paying for them or both. We traded discussing ‘honey-do’ project for discussing the Canes play-off chances or who has the more wicked slap-shot, Corvo or Babchuk. Nearly ever hockey player has a nickname and it’s usually used by the arena announcer when these guys score. Joooooooooooe “SCORVO”!!!! Antoooooooon “BOMBCHUK”!!!! There’s interesting stuff going on for the kids during play stoppage. One TO per team per game. And your ass had better be ready to play immediately or the face-off man is changed. (Something like a jump ball that takes enormous skill and quickness to win one.) OK Enough, enough. I didn’t like hockey until I tried it once now I’m almost as addicted as my wife.

  2. TheCOWDOG 03/26/2009 at 5:04 PM #

    Grey, let’s talk AM about all this.

    Had an excuriating day and your word play

    just gave me my first blast of upbeat.

  3. Noah 03/26/2009 at 5:57 PM #

    It’s a bit ticky – tacky Noah, but a MLB club actually loses rights to kid a couple of weeks before he gets on campus.

    Huh. I remember during the Brien Taylor thing that people said if he stepped foot into his classes at Louisburg that the Yankees would lose their rights to him.

    I think that came up during the Trot Nixon situation a few years later.

  4. Dr. BadgerPack 03/26/2009 at 6:03 PM #

    Noah/Cowdog– you’re both right. Previously, the classroom situation applied. A couple of years ago (or maybe even last year) the Aug 15 deadline was put into place to prevent these protracted negotiations. Also inserted into the rules were compensatory first round picks in the event you didn’t sign your guy. Say you had the first pick, and he didn’t sign. In the next draft, you get pick “1b” so basically, the second pick in the draft.

  5. Noah 03/26/2009 at 6:21 PM #

    Wow. That’s pretty good compensation. Thanks!

  6. buttPACKer 03/26/2009 at 7:32 PM #

    Grey,

    do you live in Utah?

  7. CStanley 03/26/2009 at 7:33 PM #

    I think they should fire Calhoun.

    And then we can hire him, 🙂

  8. highstick 03/26/2009 at 11:11 PM #

    Greywolf, I can tell you’re hooked!!! Just make sure you’re protecting your fivehole!

    My wife had never been to a game until 1997 and she was hooked after one game!

    The guys don’t get too upset with the officials on the ice most of the time cause they all go drink beer together afterwards! Besides, they just say things “under their breath” about the official in French, Czech, Russian, etc.

    I take great offense that you did not explain the “highsticking” rules to Noah!!

    Fun game, Noah, to compare a basketball player who can’t dribble without hitting his feet to a hockey player on ice is worse than comparing apples to asparagus! Hockey players usually make pretty good golfers too!! And I’m not talking about the Adam Sandler movie!

  9. Alpha Wolf 03/27/2009 at 7:15 AM #

    Not to hijack this thread into a hockey thread, but I too am an addict.

    It’s a great sport, and once a spectator starts to understand the subtleties of it they almost always agree.

  10. Rick 03/27/2009 at 7:25 AM #

    I am hooked on hockey too.

    It is so much more exciting than basketball. I was watching the basketball game last night and found myself constantly changing the channel because there was a time out or FT shots or something else that slowed up the game. You turn from hockey and you miss something. And I have been a basketball junkie my whole life. I still play twice a week at age 40.

  11. Rochester 03/27/2009 at 7:35 AM #

    UConn has had its share of shady players showing up on campus, too. A.J. Price and Marcus Williams got sticky fingers on some laptops a few years ago. Jerome Dyson and Doug Wiggen were both suspended last year for drug usage (not the first offense for either of them, I don’t believe). Wiggen wasn’t welcomed back. Dyson was (he’s the better player, hmmm …). Then this Miles kid was so bad even UConn had to kick him out.

    They might like to point to Emeka Okafor as the shining example of a Husky (graduated in three years, great student, great player), but the reality is he’s the exception there. He probably had to take inventory in his dorm room after his teammates stopped by.

  12. wufpup76 03/27/2009 at 8:13 AM #

    “He probably had to take inventory in his dorm room after his teammates stopped by.”

    ^Funny stuff 🙂

  13. Noah 03/27/2009 at 8:28 AM #

    The shady stuff at UConn goes back further than that. There were a lot of rumors flying around about Calhoun in the very early 90s.

    There was scuttlebutt about a guard and I’m blanking on the name. Chris Gwynn? Something like that.

  14. wufpup76 03/27/2009 at 8:50 AM #

    ^I can’t remember the nam either Noah (you’re probably correct for all I know), but I do recall what you’re referring to.

    UConn had a pretty meteoric rise in the late ’80’s and early ’90’s

  15. Moose Hunter 03/27/2009 at 10:14 AM #

    The NCAA changed its tune after calhoun gave his statement yesterday. The cbs guys made it sound like jim really pissed off the ncaa with his statement, and forced their hand

  16. Greywolf 03/27/2009 at 11:11 AM #

    buttPACKer
    March 26th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
    Grey,

    “do you live in Utah?”
    Raleigh, why you ask?

    Highstick,
    Trying to explain hockey rules would be more ridiculous than trying to explain that LF doesn’t have the autonomy to do the things on his own that we want him fired for doing. 😉
    Besides, I’m not sure that I understand the “highsticking” rules. All I know is if you draw blood, you get a double minor instead of just a 2 minute minor if you don’t draw blood. And as I understand it, if you don’t hit anybody there is no highsticking call. (I think I would get one of those little sacks of chicken blood to keep in my gum to use to “bleed” if I got hit in the face. God I love to cheat!
    `
    Some hockey rules are “results” based and most place responsibility on the player to not be in violation. The very same hit that does not result in a penalty IS a penalty if you injure a player. It is the perpetrating player’s responsibility to avoid injuring his opponent.
    `
    What a concept. Responsibility by the player. What would basketball be like if it was the defenders responsibility too avoid a player who is driving to the basket instead of sliding in front of the scorer and “selling” a charge. If I had my way, no player who was not trying to defend the play would ever be awarded a foul shot for such “pussy” basketball. Play the effing game.
    `
    While I’m on a soap box, I’d instruct my players to knock the living shit out of somebody who stepped into his path on a switch. Let the zebras call a charge. How many “revues” would it take before it became clear that Hansblow’s feet were not set. Same thing with the constant “moving screens.” Coaches coaching tactics that violate rules would be warned the first time it happened, suspended from a game the second and progressively worse penalties for the thick-headed ones.
    `
    The “American” way of putting all the responsibility for the integrity of the game on the referees, is the source of our complaints about refereeing. We are not going to get “better” referees by making the game nearly impossible to referee by coaching players how to violate the rules and not get caught.
    `
    Integrity? I wonder how many will support that concept? Cheat and as long as you get away with it and win, it’s OK. This is what we teach young people and then we are outraged at what we read about Congressmen, bankers, etc., cheating on taxes, taking bribes, giving bonuses. There’s more.
    `
    It doesn’t matter that a coach is widely suspected of cheating in recruiting, if he can “sell” that he’s not, hire him. “If they fire Calhoun, we’ll take him.” “NCSU basketball died the day Calipari turned us down.” Do we really want someone here who is in as tight with the AAU gang as he is? We have no interest in a player who doesn’t have a big AAU rep like Davis who wouldn’t take advantage of recruiting trips, we want the player who will string schools along for the trips while he is committed to, hopefully, us.
    `
    In the world of blue-chip recruiting today, you have to associate with the AAU power brokers to get the 5-Star recruits. Sid apparently refuses to go that route. It’s the old fashioned way of relationships with low-paid high school coaches who want their players to go the school that gives them the best combination of education and basketball. That was the ACC a few years ago. Even Roy and Mike are suffering in the system today. They can get the players who are HS AAs with parents who don’t want them transferring all over the country, etc. They are not interested in the others. The Caliparis are and surely if we had a Calipari for our coach, we would be going to the Final Four, Great Eight and the Sweet Sixteen.
    `
    IMO the more vocal NCSU fans are willing to sell NCSUs soul for trips to the Final Four, Great Eight and the Sweet Sixteen, while the “dirty doo” Thirty Two is “not acceptable.” Just win, baby. We don’t care about all that other shit. And would anyone care what happened at Memphis when LF was there if he had fired HS the first year he was here? Or NCSU was winning national titles in BB and going to BCS bowls every year in football? Would we give two shits where he went on the weekend? Or what he had for lunch? You bet your ass we wouldn’t.
    `
    The big boys, the Chancellor and likely the BOT are idiots for thinking that it might take as long as six years to GRADUATE the players recruited for their attributes that contribute to the Princeton offence being effective and recruit athletes that have the ability to run, shoot, rebound, defend and play the style of play that can take Duke and UNX down and win National Championships. Those idiots don’t realize that Coach X can perform this miracle in three years and we can produce the statistics to prove it — and anything else we want to prove.
    `
    Sid may not make it. He may not be able to learn what he needs to know. I think taking a chance that he could learn and make it was a better path than hiring someone and hoping they could develope the level of integrity, passion for NCSU and interest in what’s best for the student athlete who wants what we have to offer at NCSU. The same people who want to pull Brandon Costner’s scholarship are now saying that his graduating and leaving is a bad sign for Sid. I say it is a wonderful sign that we have at least one attribute that we demand coaches at NCSU have. Thank God TOB has it in spades. Praise Jesus the Chancellor and the BOT insisted on hiring a basketball coach that also has it.

    We do our best to discredit LF for being at Memphis when their scandal occurred. Maybe he was recruited because he avoided the wrong-doing, maybe even blew the whistle on it. We’ll never know. He was recruited and it wasn’t for his record of his teams winning championships. He didn’t approach NCSU we approached him. If anyone is expecting him to be fired because Sid din’t win, you will surely be disappointed. BTW If MAF had wanted HS fired, we wouldn’t have to worry about LF being our AD. He would be gone.
    `
    I didn’t intend for this to go where it went. While it’s here, there is one more bit of information that might be useful in dealing with the “big money men.” The didn’t get to be “money men” by abandoning their five and ten year plans the first year because immediate success didn’t happen. Or the second or third year or even the fourth year. These men are not successful because they are intolerant of failure, they are successful because of their vision and ability to see what it will take to be successful. If these men sat down with the Chancellor, the AD and Sid and determined it would take 6 years to get where they want the NCSU basketball program to be, you can count on Sid and LF to be here until the end of the sixth year.
    `
    Finally you can bet your hat, ass and overcoat that coaches, recruits, point guards and big men were not a part of their discussion. Their plan is built or based on a foundation of integrity, not AAU hot-shots or sleazy coaches.
    `
    Flame on!!

Leave a Reply