The State of State Part Five – ACC Rankings (Bar Graphs Galore)

How do NC State’s ACC winning percentages and conference finishes compare to the other schools in the conference during Lee Fowler’s tenure as AD from 2000-01 to 2007-08? Below are winning percentage statistics in ACC play for the 13 sports that have win/loss records and average finish for the 8 sports that do not have win/loss records.

Notes:
• These stats are ONLY for the 21 ACC sports in which NC State competes. They do not include ACC sports in which State does not have a program (lacrosse, field hockey, rowing) or non-ACC sports (gymnastics, rifle).

• The stats for Boston College, Miami and Virginia Tech are only for the seasons they were members of the ACC and not for the full eight year time span.

• In addition to the expansion schools, other schools may not have fielded a team during the full eight year time span (such as NC State Softball).

• Because of the fluctuating number of teams, average finish may not be an ideal statistic but should provide a general idea of how the non-win/loss sports rank.

• Winning percentage graphs are ordered highest to lowest (big bar=good), average finish graphs are ordered lowest to highest (small bar=good).

Football ACC Winning Percentage
1. Virginia Tech – .844 (2 ACC Titles)
2. Florida St – .719 (4 ACC Titles)
3. Boston College – .667
4. Georgia Tech – .594
5. Clemson – .578
t6. Maryland – .563 (1 ACC Title)
t6. Virginia – .563
8. Miami – .500
9. NC State – .438
10. Wake Forest – .391 (1 ACC Title)
11. North Carolina – .375
12. Duke – .047
acc-football-pct.JPG

M Basketball ACC Winning Percentage
1. Duke – .750 (5 ACC Titles, 1 Nat’l Title)
2. North Carolina – .641 (2 ACC Titles, 1 Nat’l Title)
3. Maryland – .594 (1 ACC Title, 1 Nat’l Title)
4. Wake Forest – .523
5. Boston College – .521
6. Virginia Tech – .484
7. NC State – .469
8. Georgia Tech – .453
9. Virginia – .430
10. Miami – .406
11. Florida St – .352
12. Clemson – .336
acc-m-basketball-pct.JPG

W Basketball ACC Winning Percentage
1. Duke – .900 (4 ACC Titles)
2. North Carolina – .775 (4 ACC Titles)
3. Maryland – .550 (1 Nat’l Title)
4. Florida St – ..533
5. NC State – .525
6. Virginia – .500
7. Georgia Tech – .392
8. Boston College – .381
9. Clemson – .358
10. Virgina Tech – .357
11. Miami – .250
12. Wake Forest – .192
acc-w-basketball-pct.JPG

Baseball ACC Winning Percentage
1. Florida St – .726 (2 ACC Titles)
2. Miami – .650 (1 ACC Title)
3. North Carolina – .637 (1 ACC Title)
4. Clemson – .633 (1 ACC Title)
5. Georgia Tech – .629 (2 ACC Titles)
6. Virginia – .545
7. NC State – .512
8. Wake Forest – .472 (1 ACC Title)
9. Boston College – .337
10. Duke – .250
11. Maryland – .238
12. Virginia Tech – .209
acc-baseball-pct.JPG

Volleyball ACC Winning Percentage
1. Georgia Tech – .747 (1 ACC Title)
2. Duke – .719 (1 ACC Title)
3. North Carolina – .664 (3 ACC Titles)
4. Florida St – .548
5. Clemson – .507 (1 ACC Title)
6. Virginia – .500
7. Maryland – .486 (3 ACC Titles)
8. Miami – .476
9. Wake Forest – .445
10. Virginia Tech – .415
11. Boston College-.333
12. NC State – .021
acc-volleyball-pct.JPG

M Soccer ACC Winning Percentage
1. Virginia – .600 (2 ACC Titles)
t2. Maryland – .545 (1 ACC Title, 1 Nat’l Title)
t2. Wake Forest – .545 (1 Nat’l Title)
4. Duke – .509 (2 ACC Titles)
5. North Carolina – .491 (1 ACC Title, 1 Nat’l Title)
6. Boston College – .417 (1 ACC Title)
7. Clemson – .364 (1 ACC Title)
8. Virginia Tech – .323
9. NC State – .182
acc-m-soccer-pct.JPG

W Soccer ACC Winning Percentage
1. North Carolina – .881 (7 ACC Titles, 3 Nat’l Titles)
2. Virginia – .597 (1 ACC Title)
3. Florida St – .552
4. Clemson – .478
5. Boston College – .467
6. Duke – .463
7. Wake Forest – .448
8. Maryland – .254
9. Virginia Tech – .231
10. Miami – .205
11. NC State – .164
acc-w-soccer-pct.JPG

M Tennis ACC Winning Percentage
1. Duke – .813 (3 ACC Titles)
2. Virginia – .770 (4 ACC Titles)
3. North Carolina – .716 (1 ACC Title)
4. Florida St – .635
5. Wake Forest – .613
6. Miami – .524
7. Georgia Tech – .480
8. Clemson – .440
9. Virginia Tech – .372
10. NC State – .227
11. Maryland – .080
12. Boston College – .030
acc-m-tennis-pct.JPG

W Tennis ACC Winning Percentage
1. Miami – .810
2. Duke – .787 (2 ACC Titles)
3. Clemson – .733 (2 ACC Titles)
4. Georgia Tech – .727 (3 ACC Titles, 1 Nat’l Title)
5. North Carolina – .716 (1 ACC Title)
6. Wake Forest – .507
7. Florida St – .467
8. Virginia – .373
9. Maryland – .240
10. NC State – .213
11. Virginia Tech – .116
12. Boston College – .030
acc-w-tennis-pct.JPG

Softball ACC Winning Percentage
1. Florida St – .691 (2 ACC Titles)
2. North Carolina – .622 (1 ACC Title)
3. Virginia Tech – .603 (2 ACC Titles)
4. Georgia Tech – .569 (2 ACC Titles)
5. NC State – .547 (1 ACC Title)
6. Virginia – .330
7. Maryland – .302
8. Boston College – .274
acc-softball-pct.JPG

Wrestling ACC Winning Percentage
t1. NC State – .628 (4 ACC Titles)
t1. North Carolina – .628 (3 ACC Titles)
3. Virginia – .583
4. Virginia Tech – .450
5. Maryland – .444 (1 ACC Title)
6. Duke – .167
acc-wrestling-pct.JPG

M Swimming ACC Winning Percentage
1. Virginia – .976 (7 ACC Titles)
2. Florida St – .840 (1 ACC Title)
3. North Carolina – .762
4. Clemson – .563
5. Georgia Tech – .417
6. Virginia Tech – .400
7. NC State – .375
8. Maryland – .159
9. Duke – .056
t10. Boston College – .000
t10. Miami – .000
acc-m-swimming-pct.JPG

W Swimming ACC Winning Percentage
1. Florida St – .885 (1 ACC Title)
2. North Carolina – .857 (3 ACC Titles)
3. Virginia – .833 (3 ACC Titles)
t4. Maryland – .667 (1 ACC Title)
t4. Virginia Tech – .667
6. Clemson – .383
7. NC State – .234
8. Georgia Tech – .147
9. Duke – .108
t10. Boston College – .000
t10. Miami – .000
acc-w-swimming-pct.JPG

M Cross Country Average ACC Finish
1. NC State – 1.50 (5 ACC Titles)
2. Virginia – 2.63 (2 ACC Titles)
3. Florida St – 3.50
4. Duke – 4.38 (1 ACC Title)
5. Clemson – 5.13
6. Wake Forest – 5.38
7. Virginia Tech – 6.50
t8. Boston College – 8.00
t8. North Carolina – 8.00
10. Maryland – 8.63
11. Georgia Tech – 8.88
12. Miami – 11.50
acc-m-cross-country.JPG

W Cross Country Average ACC Finish
1. NC State – 1.63 (4 ACC Titles)
t2. Duke – 3.38 (2 ACC Titles)
t2. North Carolina – 3.38 (1 ACC Title)
4. Wake Forest – 4.38 (1 ACC Title)
5. Boston College – 4.67
6. Virginia – 4.88
7. Florida St – 5.25 (1 ACC Title)
8. Virginia Tech – 6.50
9. Maryland – 8.25
10. Georgia Tech – 8.38
11. Clemson – 9.63
12. Miami – 11.50
acc-w-cross-country.JPG

M Golf Average ACC Finish
1. Georgia Tech – 2.13 (4 ACC Titles)
2. Clemson – 2.88 (2 ACC Titles, 1 Nat’l Title)
3. Wake Forest – 4.38
4. North Carolina – 4.63 (1 ACC Title)
5. NC State – 4.75
6. Duke – 5.25 (1 ACC Title)
7. Florida St – 5.88 (1 ACC Title)
8. Virginia Tech – 7.00 (1 ACC Title)
9. Virginia – 7.38
10. Maryland – 9.00
11. Boston College – 10.67
acc-m-golf.JPG

W Golf Average ACC Finish
1. Duke – 1.00 (8 ACC Titles, 4 Nat’l Titles)
2. Wake Forest – 2.38
3. Virginia – 3.80
4. Florida St – 4.25
5. North Carolina – 4.75
6. NC State – 4.88
7. Maryland – 6.00
8. Miami – 7.25
9. Boston College – 9.00
acc-w-golf.JPG

M Indoor Track Average ACC Finish
1. Florida St – 1.38 (6 ACC Titles)
2. Clemson – 1.88 (2 ACC Titles)
3. North Carolina – 4.13
4. Georgia Tech – 4.75
5. NC State – 5.13
6. Virginia – 6.13
7. Virginia Tech – 6.25
8. Wake Forest – 7.13
t9. Duke – 8.75
t9. Maryland – 8.75
11. Miami – 9.50
12. Boston College – 12.00
acc-m-indoor-track.JPG

W Indoor Track Average ACC Finish
1. North Carolina – 1.75 (3 ACC Titles)
2. Miami – 2.00 (2 ACC Titles)
3. Virginia Tech – 3.75 (2 ACC Titles)
4. Georgia Tech – 4.00 (1 ACC Title)
5. Florida St – 4.63
6. Clemson – 5.88
7. NC State – 6.63
8. Virginia – 6.88
9. Duke – 7.63
10. Wake Forest – 7.88
11. Maryland – 8.50
12. Boston College – 9.00
acc-w-indoor-track.JPG

M Outdoor Track Average ACC Finish
1. Florida St – 1.25 (6 ACC Titles, 3 Nat’l Titles)
2. Clemson – 1.75 (2 ACC Titles)
3. North Carolina – 3.88
t4. NC State – 4.63
t4. Virginia – 4.63
6. Georgia Tech – 5.75
7. Virginia Tech – 6.50
8. Wake Forest – 7.13
9. Maryland – 8.75
10. Duke – 9.25
11. Miami – 9.75
12. Boston College – 12.00
acc-m-outdoor-track.JPG

W Outdoor Track Average ACC Finish
1. Miami – 1.50 (2 ACC Titles)
2. North Carolina – 2.13 (4 ACC Titles)
3. Florida St – 2.88
t4. Georgia Tech – 4.00
t4. Virginia Tech – 4.00 (2 ACC Titles)
6. Virginia – 5.50
7. Clemson – 6.00
8. NC State – 7.00
9. Wake Forest – 8.13
10. Maryland – 8.63
11. Duke – 8.75
12. Boston College – 10.67
acc-w-outdoor-track.JPG

Summary Graphs:
Average ACC Ranking(for the 21 ACC sports in which NC State competes)
1. North Carolina – 3.38
2. Florida St – 3.74
3. Virginia – 4.91
4. Georgia Tech – 5.47
5. Clemson – 5.67
6. Duke – 5.75
7. NC State – 6.52
8. Wake Forest – 6.65
9. Virginia Tech – 6.85
10. Maryland – 7.57
11. Miami – 7.82
12. Boston College – 9.00
acc-avg-ranking.JPG

ACC Championships (for the 21 ACC sports in which NC State competes)
1. North Carolina – 36
2. Duke – 29
3. Florida St – 24
4. Virginia – 19
5. NC State – 14
6. Georgia Tech – 13
7. Clemson – 11
8. Virginia Tech – 9
9. Maryland – 8
10. Miami – 5
11. Wake Forest – 3
12. Boston College – 1
acc-titles.JPG

ACC Championship Sports (for the 21 ACC sports in which NC State competes)
1. North Carolina – 15
2. Duke – 10
3. Florida St – 9
4. Clemson – 7
t5. Georgia Tech – 6
t5. Maryland – 6
t5. Virginia – 6
8. Virginia Tech – 5
9. NC State – 4
t10. Miami – 3
t10. Wake Forest – 3
12. Boston College – 1
acc-title-sports.JPG

Now that you’ve looked at more bar graphs than you ever wanted to, please feel free to share your comments and observations.

About WV Wolf

Graduated from NCSU in 1996 with a degree in statistics. Born and inbred in West "By God" Virginia and now live in Raleigh where I spend my time watching the Wolfpack, the Mountaineers and the Carolina Hurricanes as well as making bar graphs for SFN. I'm @wvncsu on the Twitter machine.

AD & Department Baseball NCS Basketball NCS Football Non-Revenue Rankings & Lists Stat of the Day

36 Responses to The State of State Part Five – ACC Rankings (Bar Graphs Galore)

  1. thekind 07/19/2008 at 9:52 PM #

    Old Fearless Lee is a politician, and that is how he has kept his job so long.
    When I went to the Wolfpack Club meeting at Atlantic Beach, he talked about spending the night with Bob Mattocks (BOT). I thought I’d throw up.
    Lee Fowler needs to go. We are a bush league program with consistently bush league athletics.

  2. waxhaw 07/20/2008 at 8:12 AM #

    FSU and GT fared a lot better overall than I thought they would.

    SFN: FSU is a very interesting test case. Go back and look at the improvement of their entire department over the last 25 years and you will be shocked.

  3. statemech 07/20/2008 at 12:34 PM #

    redfred, the way I’ve heard it, and some others here will know more about this than I do, is that when it comes to the athletic department there is no real structure and so nobody is really on top. This of course allows mistakes to go on without worries of accountability.

  4. blpack 07/20/2008 at 7:53 PM #

    We basically have the 2 CC programs, wrestling and it appears our new softball program is on solid footing. Hopefully baseball will continue to grow, but this year may be the exception rather than the rule. Outside of those we have not won much of anything and too often stuggle to be mid-tier. We have put up with mediocrity for too long.

  5. WolftownVA81 07/20/2008 at 11:07 PM #

    I’d like to know what Lee’s boss (Chancellor/BOT} thinks success in atheletics means. Since NCSU is a public institution, shouldn’t the performance measurements of its top leaders be public information? As RF has stated many times in the past, if Lee is accomplishing what his boss wants him to do, why would be change? We need some higher authority to give him new direction – like, fire coaches that consistantly lose and hire those that consistantly win.

  6. RAWFS 07/21/2008 at 9:52 AM #

    “I’d like to know what Lee’s boss (Chancellor/BOT} thinks success in atheletics means.”

    Money. And no NCAA trouble. Everything else, winning included, is secondary.

  7. WolftownVA81 07/21/2008 at 11:21 AM #

    ^Agree that’s their priority. But both kinds of success are not mutually exclusive. In fact, you’d think they would have figure out by now that winning = more support ($$$).

  8. Rick 07/21/2008 at 12:42 PM #

    “^Agree that’s their priority. But both kinds of success are not mutually exclusive. In fact, you’d think they would have figure out by now that winning = more support ($$$).”

    A couple of points
    1) While they are not exclusive, it takes very different leadership and drive to do one over the other. It takes evem more leadership to do both
    2) winning does not necesarily translate into more $$$. If the costs of improving are more than the increase in $$$ then it is actually losing money.

  9. ruffles31 07/21/2008 at 3:22 PM #

    Where is the women’s wrestling bar chart? 🙂

  10. redfred2 07/21/2008 at 8:39 PM #

    The guys in Raleigh do not need, as a matter of fact, nor do they even want to hear, a word about doing a single thing differently. They’ve got it set up, humming along on auto-pilot exactly where they want it to be, and there is not a reason in the world for them to change A SINGLE THING. I’m telling you, there is a delicate balance involved here, they know it, and they have it all effectively functioning in their favor to the max.

    The status quo in Raleigh is sooo good, that I believe their biggest fear up there is that if they actually pushed for real success in athletics, and then got it, that they would finally be exposed as the ineffective leadership that they truly are. There is already so much guaranteed revenue coming in, RIGHT NOW, that they know their own abilities to stick around could survive a worsening overall outlook in athletics much better than their skillsets could survive the rigors of an improving one.

    That all may, or may not be true, but it’s either that, or they are so collectively stupid as a group, that they don’t even give a crap either way.

  11. FedUp 07/30/2008 at 4:41 PM #

    A group has been created and is raising funding to demand appropriate consideration for the average wolfpack supporter. I heard about ot on last Saturday. It intends to advance public criticisms and educational activities about the pitiful state of NCSU. One of the principal movers is an NCSU grad state senator and he is leading an effort with the other state alums in the legislature. The is supposed to be some big publicity even around the first home football weekend. Thes are not a disjointed group of student types with no bucks. We’ll see.

Leave a Reply