Guiding Principles of Sanctions for Academic Dishonesty at UNC-CH
Guiding Principles of Sanctions for Academic Dishonesty at UNC-CH
2. Academic Dishonesty.
a. For an initial instance of academic dishonesty,
…i. The usual sanction for grade-related misconduct shall be a failing grade in the course, an aspect or component of the course, or on the assignment as recommended by the instructor, and suspension for one full academic semester or until specified conditions are met.
…ii. The minimum sanction for grade-related misconduct shall be a failing grade in the course, component or aspect of the course, or on the assignment as recommended by the instructor; probation for at least one full academic semester; an additional educational assignment or other requirements as appropriate; and a written warning that further academic misconduct will lead to more serious sanctions.
b. For a second or subsequent instance of academic dishonesty, the minimum sanction shall be suspension for at least two full academic semesters.
4 Responses to “Guiding Principles of Sanctions for Academic Dishonesty at UNC-CH”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
What I would really love to know, which is not being said, is how many instances of cheating occurred with each of these players. We talk about ‘bare minimum requirements’ assuming that ONE instance has occurred. This would presume that, in the entire time that the tutor was doing players’ assignments, that she did one assignment per player and/or that these requirements allow for a group of occurrences count as just one offense.
The bare minimum is the new “Carolina Way”
It’s been a while since the tutor story broke. How long does it take for the accused to be tried by student court? Sure has been hush hush.
Some animals are obviously more equal than others at old NC U.