Quick Look Ahead

Now that the ol’ State fans’ optimism is running high after beating the Pirates, let’s take a quick look at where State stands and what we have to look forward to over the last half of the season.

State’s current national and conference ranking in the major statistical categories.

 

National

Conf

 

 

 

Rushing
Offense

109

11

Passing
Offense

53

4

Total Offense

103

10

Scoring
Offense

94

12

Passing
Efficiency

104

11

Sacks
Allowed

87

7

 

 

 

Rushing
Defense

103

12

Pass
Defense

T-34

4

Pass
Efficiency Defense

29

5

Total
Defense

76

11

Scoring
Defense

68

11

Sacks

62

10

Tackles
For Loss

56

10

 

 

 

Net
Punting

58

8

Punt
Returns

15

2

Kickoff
Returns

55

5

Turnover
Margin

119

12

Now let’s look at the opponents:

 

ECU

UVA

Miami

Rushing
Offense

86

78

57

Passing
Offense

75

92

98

Total
Offense

94

101

96

Scoring
Offense

59

89

70

Passing
Efficiency

80

89

54

Sacks
Allowed

85

61

41

 

UNC

WF

UMd

Rushing
Offense

102

64

56

Passing
Offense

48

82

105

Total
Offense

90

83

98

Scoring
Offense

90

50

76

Passing
Efficiency

39

70

62

Sacks
Allowed

T-101

10

T-109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ECU

UVA

Miami

Rushing
Defense

55

23

46

Pass
Defense

116

T-34

22

Pass
Efficiency Defense

106

37

57

Total
Defense

103

21

32

Scoring
Defense

103

21

35

Sacks

43

T-15

T-15

Tackles
For Loss

13

74

24

 

UNC

WF

UMd

Rushing
Defense

49

38

62

Pass
Defense

43

60

42

Pass
Efficiency Defense

77

26

45

Total
Defense

42

50

51

Scoring
Defense

50

51

36

Sacks

38

T-30

93

Tackles
For Loss

T-29

T-29

101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ECU

UVA

Miami

Net
Punting

87

23

79

Punt
Returns

101

59

60

Kickoff
Returns

6

105

83

Turnover
Margin

7

60

47

 

UNC

WF

UMd

Net
Punting

26

76

36

Punt
Returns

55

61

66

Kickoff
Returns

87

72

115

Turnover
Margin

89

T-32

T-32

OBSERVATIONS

As many people have noted, the second half of State’s schedule is much easier than first half. However, ECU is clearly the easiest team in the last half of the season.

None of those teams are unbeatable….especially when you look at their offenses. This underscores the double-edged nature of State turnovers….

– Option 1 – Throwing away scoring opportunities that are few and far in-between for State’s anemic offense.

– Option 2 – Giving scoring opportunities to the opponents that they would have trouble earning on their own.

As many people have said many different ways, State can simply not afford to turn the ball over if they are going to have any chance to win.

Not only was ECU the weakest team in the last-half of the schedule, their defense is substantially weaker than the ACC teams that State will face. Right now it looks like State will face the two best (statistically speaking) defenses (UVA and Miami) over the next two weeks. It’s also important to note that UVa and UM have the best pass defenses that State will face for the remainder of the year.

– I guess it won’t take long to see if State’s offense has really improved or not.

Consider the following:

– NC State’s best two running backs are out for the year.
– State’s rushing attack ranks 109th in the country.

– State’s OL ranks 87th in sacks allowed.

So could everyone that keeps claiming that “State needs to establish the run”, please give it a rest? State hasn’t done it against anyone other than Wofford and there is absolutely no reason to think they will against any of the remaining teams. (Wofford is the only game that State managed to get over 100 yds net rushing.)

VIRGINIA

– I’ve seen UVa play twice and I wasn’t overly impressed either time.
– I look at their stats and I’m not impressed.
– Losing to Wyoming is certainly not impressive
– UVA struggled with both MTSU and UConn…not impressive.
– However, a team that wins their last three games by a total of four points impresses me.
– A team on a seven game winning streak impresses me.

Somehow UVa is playing to the level of their competition but still manages to come out on the winning side. They are either a team of destiny or they are ripe for a fall. Hopefully, they will look past State and be preoccupied with their game against WF next weekend.

RUSHING DEFENSE

As shown earlier, State’s defense against the rush has not been that good so far this season. You know that this will be an issue when State travels to Winston-Salem, but I was surprised to see that Maryland ranks second in the conference (to GT) in rushing yardage. So State’s rush defense will be one of the keys to the last two games of the season.

STRANGE FACT

BC currently has the nation’s #1 rushing defense. However, their pass defense is ranked 105th in the country and last in the conference. What’s up with that?

About VaWolf82

Engineer living in Central Va. and senior curmudgeon amongst SFN authors One wife, two kids, one dog, four vehicles on insurance, and four phones on cell plan...looking forward to empty nest status. Graduated 1982

'07 Football NCS Football

43 Responses to Quick Look Ahead

  1. Cosmo96 10/23/2007 at 8:47 PM #

    “Hopefully, they will look past State and be preoccupied with their game against WF next weekend.”

    How sad is it that it has come to this? Imagine something like this being said five years ago…

  2. MatSci94 10/23/2007 at 9:17 PM #

    Our net punting is better than 4 ACC teams? Wow.

  3. choppack1 10/23/2007 at 9:36 PM #

    VaWolf – Nice work – I wish I’d read your entire post before cutting and pasting a bunch of stuff on our opponents that I didn’t see in the preview :).

    I know it sounds like a broken record, but TO’s will be the key. That ECU game was very similar to a lot of our recent games. Team turns it over early. Team makes critical mistakes in kicking game early. Team falls behind early. Team comes back and makes it interesting. Team makes more mistakes and ends up losing.

    Our Defense has played pretty decent against BC, FSU, Louisville, and ECU. If they continue to improve and execute, we should be at least 3 of these games in the fourth quarter.

    One thing that hasn’t been mentioned is our kicker. He’s been fantastic thus far – hopefully a game or two can come down to him.

    Our OL needs to keep up w/ their improved play.

    Bottom line, if we don’t give these next 5 games away, we should be able win at least one.

  4. VaWolf82 10/23/2007 at 9:49 PM #

    I forgot to include the relevant link to conference and team stats. Here is the link for the ACC:

    http://web1.ncaa.org/d1mfb/2007/Internet/conf%20stats/2007000000821TD.HTML

    Each team’s name links to their respective pages.

  5. tacobellmanager 10/23/2007 at 10:06 PM #

    I’m all for just using the next five games as a big laboratory. We’re not going to make a bowl nor have a winning season. The entire conference is atrocious. This is a forgotten year. let’s use it to gain a better understanding of what we should be doing after we regroup and go into next year.

    So if you accept that premise, what are the areas of productive experimentation? I am on the west coast and do not see the team as closely as you guys do.

  6. vtpackfan 10/23/2007 at 10:22 PM #

    During the bye week TOB said they worked on foundamentals alot, like a mini camp (but he also said he does this with all his teams).

    What really caught my eye out of the bye week was the re evaluation of players, especially on defense. Kuhn got alot of reps of DE, and he did, again, amazing for a foreign player in his first year. I think he keeps it up and really helps our rush defense, teams were getting around the end with ease and our LB’s and Cb’s had no time to square up to the RB’s. A physical DE doesn’t have to make tackles for a loss, just stretch the play out or force it back inside.

    Remember when our last coaching staff had an assistant who said he wished he had 4 Miguel Scott’s? Holy crap, that would mean they would all be back ups. Archer and TOB shocked the hell out of me by going with Morgan and Walker in the same line up. I believe the Scott may have been seen as someone who kept getting out of position since we were giving up some huge pass plays with no help from over the top. We aren’t blitzing so there is no excuse for CB’s constanly getting isolated with WR w/o help.

    Vermiglio plays and may get to go mano y mano with Howie’s not so mini me. That could be interesting.

    Offense is always a toss up with me, I don’t care how we get yards be it pass, run or the steam roller Stephen Hauska. My burning question is do teams pay extra close attention to Blackman? Is he a decoy for us? Does he just run shitty routes? If this guy ever got the ball in the open we know where he would take it, so what’s up?

  7. noah 10/23/2007 at 10:23 PM #

    During the bye-week, TOB said that he used that time to take a look at every single position and take a close look at the depth chart. Then he came back to the public and said, “Yep, we’re playing the right people.”

    The experiment is over.

  8. vtpackfan 10/23/2007 at 10:30 PM #

    “So if you accept that premise, what are the areas of productive experimentation?”

    First in foremost IMO, was moving Kuhn to DE. This sets you up next year by sliding a DT out of the middle and opening it up for Cash, Bedics, Willis, and maybe Linney to fight it out for NT. I think this last 5 games and any experimenting will pale in comparison to the great 4-3 to 3-4 experiment that has to evolve.

    I would be in favor of scrapping the 4-3 at the end of the year, burning some red shirts at LB and getting this defense in line for ’09 and beyond. All it would take is to either get another JUCO DE or move along Sweezy a little faster then necessary. Augustine or Reiskamp could compete for an OLB position.

  9. RochesterRedWolf 10/23/2007 at 10:49 PM #

    noah, not quite, they did play Kuhn at DE and man he caused havoc…he caused one of the fumbles on a beautiful bullrush sack…saw this on espn by Pat Forde where he ranks all the current BCS teams. This is what he said about Virgina.

    Virginia (18), 7-1
    The loss: 23-3 at Wyoming

    How bad was it: Terrible. Outgained by 352 yards? By a Mountain West opponent? Check that, a mid-pack Mountain West opponent? That stain doesn’t come out, even if it did happen on the first Saturday of the season.

    How good are the wins: Suspenseful, if nothing else. The Cavaliers have won two games by one point (Maryland, Connecticut), two by two points (Middle Tennessee, North Carolina) and one by five (Georgia Tech). The Cavs have trailed in the fourth quarter in four of those five white-knucklers. Zero opponents have been ranked.

    full article (nice read)
    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=forde_pat&id=3075133&sportCat=ncf

  10. RochesterRedWolf 10/23/2007 at 10:53 PM #

    i don’t know if you guys saw or noticed Vermiglio – but on alot of run and short pass plays, he was 15-20 yrds downfield knocking heads. I don’t know if you guys can watch any of the CSTV game on replay…i would honestly give you my password and login info but then i’d have to hunt you all down. Honestly, Vermiglio was in places running along side WR’s ON THE OPPOSITE side of the field. I like that guy. Ive been talking smack to all the ECU fans complaining about him. that Long kid might take his lunch money, we’ll see.

  11. RBCRowdy 10/23/2007 at 11:12 PM #

    Look at WF’s sacks allowed, that is crazy. Only Miami is close with 4x as many sacks allowed!

  12. RBCRowdy 10/23/2007 at 11:13 PM #

    NVM, that is a ranking. Not as exciting I guess. My bad.

  13. PackerInRussia 10/23/2007 at 11:50 PM #

    According to this report: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,304497,00.html NC State has “Researchers at North Carolina State University have produced the world’s most powerful antimatter beam.” Surely we can figure out a way to use this against our opponents to neutralize any statistical advantage throughout the rest of the season. If we could zap the playing field into some kind of Bizarro World where we become really good and our opponents become really bad, then we may fair pretty well. If nothing else, we can brag that our antimatter beam is bigger than theirs (maybe that should go under the fight song post as a new idea).

  14. RochesterRedWolf 10/23/2007 at 11:56 PM #

    “We’re the Red and White from State
    and we know we are the best.
    With our antimatter beam
    we can f’up all the rest
    We’ll nuke your ass Carolina
    Wake and Duke, f you too
    We’re the Red and White from N.C. State
    Go State!!!”

  15. cooldrip 10/24/2007 at 4:38 AM #

    LMAO RochesterRedWolf

  16. bTHEredterror 10/24/2007 at 7:07 AM #

    “BC currently has the nation’s #1 rushing defense. However, their pass defense is ranked 105th in the country and last in the conference. What’s up with that?”

    I think in part due to the fact they are usually ahead, and other teams have to throw more than run. They are also not a pressure team, so they yield some yardage in the play for TOs. They are tied for 12th nationally in scoring defense at 17.9 ppg, so the yards aren’t hurting ’em too bad just yet.

  17. waxhaw 10/24/2007 at 7:36 AM #

    ^ Same reason our pass defense is better. If you can run for 200 yards on somebody, why would you pass a lot?

    Basically this article says, nice win but don’t get too excited because it doesn’t get any easier.

  18. RickJ 10/24/2007 at 9:29 AM #

    It certainly doesn’t show up in the stats but I believe we can have an average D1 defense in the second half of the year if we stay reasonably healthy. Our DL is still light years ahead of our OL. Pressley is finally healthy and needs to finish off the year in dominate fashion to improve his draft position. He and Cash can be an upper level pair of DT’s in college football. Both Pressley & Cash missed the Boston College game and Pressley was less than 100% in several more games.

    The biggest thing our defense could do to improve is catch the passes the opposing QB’s throws to them and recover the fumbles the other team lays on the ground. ECU fumbled 4 times in the game and we recovered 1.

  19. StateFans 10/24/2007 at 9:36 AM #

    While we are talking statistics – did you know that NC State has played the 15th toughest schedule in the country (ranked by Sagarin)

  20. waxhaw 10/24/2007 at 9:42 AM #

    ^ I didn’t realize it was that tough but knew it was tough.

    Before the season started, I thought we’d be 3-4 right now due to the difficulty of our schedule. (wins over CF, Wofford and ECU) As far as that goes, we are only one behind.

    The difference being that I tought we would finish strong with wins over VA, UNC and one or both out of Wake/Maryland. Those games look significantly harder than earlier in the year.

    Virginia has only lost one game, UNC is improving, Wake is picking up almost where they left off and Maryland might be the biggest surprise in the conference next to Virginia.

  21. packgrad2000 10/24/2007 at 10:26 AM #

    I think one of the single biggest reasons for improvement on Saturday was the D-line play. They pressured the QB, and on at least one occasion directly caused an INT (Pressley off the deflection). Coming into the year I thought we’d have more INT’s since we’d be playing more zone and less man but up till the ECU game that hasn’t been the case.
    I’m with you RickJ, with Pressley finally healthy and Cash coming on now, maybe we can at least wreak havoc on UNC and UMd’s QB’s (from looking at the stats above).
    Then again, Daniel Evans isn’t going to throw for 300+ yards much, and certainly not against the teams we have left (all better against the pass than ECU).

  22. noah 10/24/2007 at 10:49 AM #

    “I don’t know if you guys can watch any of the CSTV game on replay”

    There’s a torrent up at ACCVideos. I downloaded a copy yesterday.

  23. RochesterRedWolf 10/24/2007 at 11:00 AM #

    Don’t forget though, the tireholes have a horrible pass defense. Miami woke up too late but they torched them. USC torched them and then stopped doing it…UNC also has a terrible run defense. And with the Miami-zation (thug-life) now in full effect over in The ‘Hole (2 more suspensions), a starting CB is gone. UNC is more winnable than you think. Don’t drink the local media Kool-aid that says UNC is the best 2-5 team in the country. Obviously MD is good but how good remains to be seen.

  24. packgrad2000 10/24/2007 at 11:12 AM #

    I’m just going from the stats above RedWolf. UNC is better than average nationally, ranked 43, 49, and 42 in pass, rush, and total defense. ECU is 116, 55, and 103 nationally in those categories, and is easily the worst defense we’ll see in the 2nd half of the season (as VaWolf pointed out).
    I still think we can win, but it will be tougher to move the ball against UNC than ECU. Unless, of course, we really did just turn over a new leaf.

  25. EverettBeez 10/24/2007 at 11:15 AM #

    The fact that UVa keeps winning in the final querter scares me the most. This team has to have the mentality they can win any game. (reminds me of our basketball team) I’ve put a small bet on the game with my buddy here at work, and I’ve got this sinking feeling they are going to steal it from us in the final 3 min’s.

Leave a Reply