Inane utterances from the local media, gross inaccuracies perpetrated by the national media, and glaring inadequacies of Stateâ€™s athletic department frequently provide topics to address here. But every so often, someone in one of the organizations that we often ridicule will absolutely nail an issue. Such is the case with an article today by Pete Fiutak at foxsports.com.
I liked his entire commentary, but he â€œstoleâ€ my idea that I was saving for next summer at the onset of pre-season football hype. Since Pete started the ball rolling, we might as well finish it off. Letâ€™s look at the last point from his article:
ACC disappointed when it counted most:
On the flip side, it’s disaster time for the ACC. Its star, Virginia Tech, lost, making the league zero for its last six in the Orange Bowl
Boston College struggled to get by an average Michigan State in the Champs Sports, Florida State fought well considering the circumstances, but lost to Kentucky in the Music City, Maryland lost to Oregon State in the Emerald, Georgia Tech got pantsed by Fresno State in the Humanitarian, Clemson lost to Auburn n the Chick-fil-A, and Virginia lost late to Texas Tech in the Gator.
Only Wake Forest really came through with a good win over Connecticut in the Meineke Car Care Bowl, but that’ll be little solace for a league that now has to be considered fifth, at best, among the BCS leagues. Yes, when it comes to national perception, and respect in the polls the following season, these things do matter.
It wasnâ€™t that long ago that I summarized the ACCâ€™s successes in bowl games. (Warning, SFNâ€™s recent transition has messed with the tables in my old entry.) I would hate to go back and update those numbers to include the last two years.
At the first of November, I highlighted the woeful state of the ACC offenses. The offensive numbers are so bad that they bear updating:
- 10 of 12 ACC offenses rank in the lower half of Div 1 FB
- 8 of 12 ACC offenses rank in the lower 25% of Div 1 FB
2003 (9 teams)
ACC Sagarin Ranking – #1
Total Offense – Median rank: 43
Scoring Offense – Median rank: 48
2004 (11 teams)
ACC Sagarin Ranking – #1
Total Offense – Median rank: 76
Scoring Offense – Median rank: 73
2005 (12 teams)
ACC Sagarin Ranking – #2
Total Offense – Median rank: 66
Scoring Offense – Median rank: 66.5
ACC Sagarin Ranking – #4
Total Offense – Median rank: 92
Scoring Offense – Median rank: 76
2007 (Not final)
ACC Sagarin Ranking – #5
Total Offense – Median rank: 95
Scoring Offense – Median rank: 85
While not a perfect correlation, itâ€™s pretty clear that the demise in ACC FB on a national level has happened as the ACC offensive production has dropped out of sight low. In 2004 and 2005, you can build an argument that the ACC defenses were so good that the offensive numbers are misleading. However over the last two years, that line of reasoning breaks down.
The Sagarin rankings and the bowl results show that the ACC teams just donâ€™t measure up on a national level over the last two years. Last year the ACC was 4-4 in bowl games, losing the three biggest bowl games (Orange, Peach, and Gator)â€¦and this year was even worse.
The total scope of off-season issues will vary from team to teamâ€¦but itâ€™s clear to me that offensive improvement needs to be near the top of the list for nearly every ACC team.