I’ve stayed off of the threads since the UNC one. From my perspective, all that needed to be said was said there. Some still need more convincing. BC, GT and possibly ensuing losses may convince them. Maybe they won’t. Some needed to wait until the Titanic was obviously going down to try and get on the life boats.
In my mind, this was a hire with red flags and always needed to have a much tighter leash. This isn’t the first year of underperforming:
– Year 2: Start #6, waste a lot of talent, bow out of the tournament in the first round. Received mulligan because of “bad players.”
– Year 5: Losing overall record. Blames injuries and short bench. Fires assistants (blames bad employees).
– Year 6: Not complete yet, but well on our way to waste the most talent and deepest team we’ve had since V. If that happens, it should be strike 3.
