There are two things in all the coaching debates that tire me:
1) Running down the players to defend the coach: Whether it’s WTNY because the next crop are better, or “the coach doesn’t miss shots, tackles, etc.” or “our players aren’t that good” or whatever the reason, many of these types of posters cannot seem to find the same level of “constructive criticism” about the coaching staffs. They seem to forget these coaches are paid millions and assistants hundreds of thousands while the players are paid a fraction of their value to the university, are the ones training and conditioning, risking injury and trying to balance a course load too.
Fantastic post. Players change, yet the same excuses coming from the man in charge don’t.