The Spartan Way > The Carolina Way

In doing some research to help out VAWolf82 in his recent entry I found a compliance document on academic fraud from Michigan State that can be found here.

At the bottom of page 1 and top of page 2 the document lists the NCAA rules on academic fraud discussed in VAWolf82’s entry. But the interesting thing in the Michigan St document is the paragraph that follows the NCAA rules:

Student-athletes found in violation of ethical conduct legislation involving academic fraud will be declared immediately ineligible for intercollegiate competition until their eligibility is reinstated. A student-athlete who is involved in academic fraud will be withheld from one season of competition and will be charged with a season of competition.

If I’m reading that right, if you’re a student athlete at Michigan State and you get caught cheating not only are you done for the year but you don’t get that year back.

To add insult to injury, Michigan State is currently 8-0 and ranked 5th in the country by ESPN. It certainly seems that “big time football” is indeed obtainable while clinging to, at the very least, some semblance of integrity.

Now compare that with the situation at Carolina. As was discussed in one of Old MacDonald’s recent nightly updates, Butch Davis had this quote concerning Charles Brown:

And then Charlie Brown found out that he’s going to be put on probation for two semesters. He’s got one year of eligibility remaining, so he’ll stay on the football team and obviously he’ll get a chance to practice and go through spring practice and use this year as a red-shirt year.

Carolina also plans on redshirting running back Ryan Houston. Houston was not announced as part of the agent benefit prong so we have to assume he is part of the academic prong for cheating (allegedly).

On a bit of a sidenote, here is a quote by Butch Davis on redshirting Houston:

“The resolution is if we need him to win games, we’re going to play him,” Davis said. “In the ideal situation that we would like not to.”

That’s quite the lesson Butch is teaching his players. You can sit out for cheating (allegedly) unless we need to win.

So Charles Brown and Ryan Houston cheat (allegedly) and get to redshirt. If they were Spartans, they would be “be charged with a season of competition”.

Lets take a look at some other examples of cheating suspensions around the country.

From ESPN.com, former Maryland QB Josh Portis was suspended for the 2007 season for cheating. Portis played in 2005 at Florida, sat out his transfer year in 2006, was suspended in 2007, played in 2008 at Maryland before transferring again to Division II California University of Pennsylvania where he had 2 years of elligibility. So Portis will still get to play 4 years of football but with the transfer down to Division II, I’m not completely sure how all that works as far as years of elligibility.

Another Maryland example, basketball player Dino Gregory missed the first 5 weeks and 8 games of the 2009-10 season as part of a 6 month suspension for academic misconduct, a suspension that was appealed twice unsuccessfully. Details here.

Former Syracuse WR Mike Williams played 2 years at Syracuse, was suspended and possibly expelled for cheating and left the school completely. He came back the next year as a senior but ended up quitting the team. Williams lost his junior year but since he wasn’t even enrolled at Syracuse he couldn’t have redshirted. You can read some details here.

At Duke, former QB Zack Asack was suspended for the entire 2006 season for plagiarism and returned to play in 2008 and 2009 before being kicked off the team as a senior, details here and here.

In some older Duke basketball cases, Greg Newton was suspended for two semesters in 1995 after cheating on a computer science exam and Ricky Price
was suspended for two semesters in 1997 for plagiarism, both are mentioned here.

So in the case of Charles Brown and Ryan Houston, Michigan State appears to have a higher standard but a two semester suspension seems to be the going rate at other schools for cheating (allegedly) and redshirting can be an option. But I think it is safe to say without a doubt that The Spartan Way > The Carolina Way. And we’ve been led to believe that nothing is greater than The Carolina Way.

But now lets look at the news that Kendric Burney will be able to take the field against Bill & Mary. Burney’s situation has been discussed at SFN both here and here.

So here we have a player that has already been suspended by the NCAA for six games for taking $1,333 in benefits from agents. Then he is also involved in the academic prong for cheating (allegedly resulting in a failing grade in a course previously taken as purportedly dictated by the UNC Honor Court ruling) and gets to play again when players at other schools who cheated but didn’t take trips and money from agents have to sit out a year?!?

The News and Observer today printed statements from Tyrone Burney, Kendrick’s father, saying his son’s grade was not changed to a failing grade by the Honor Court, but rather it was changed from a C to a C-. Being that this writing course (if you recall the tutor was allegedly writing papers for players) is a core course, Burney must obtain at least a C grade to get credit for it. Therefore, the Honor Court changing the grade from a C to a C- is effectively the same action as changing it to an F. The end result is the same per Mr. Burney, that is that Burney is not going to graduate this semester and will have to take the class in the Spring. Therefore, the NCAA, assuming this is indeed true, has waived their own rule to allow a player to carry less than a full load to be eligible without that player being on course to graduate in the same semester.

Tyrone Burney said his son was cleared by the university’s honor court on Oct. 19. Burney had a grade in writing class from a previous semester – a core class necessary for Burney to graduate – changed by a half of a letter grade.

Burney did not fail the disputed class, which resulted in his appearance before the honor court, his father said. The grade was changed from a “C” to a “C-minus,” his father said. Under university policy, Burney needed a “C” in the core class to graduate.

The change in grade affected Burney’s academic standing with the NCAA. The NCAA requires athletes to carry a minimum of 12 credit hours, unless as a senior they need fewer hours to graduate.

Burney was on track to graduate in December, his father said, and is taking one class, or three credit hours, this semester. Since the grade was changed in the core class, Burney needs six hours to graduate. Under NCAA rules, he needs to be enrolled in six hours or receive a waiver from the NCAA to participate.

Burney received the waiver and the school announced his return on Tuesday.

Burney, a fifth-year senior, will have to re-take the class in the spring to graduate, his father said.

Read more: http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/10/27/762389/burney-cleared-to-return.html#ixzz13ZFEUVZw

We still contend that there are still questions to be answered regarding Burney’s miraculous comeback in light of the ongoing investigation in Chapel Hill that hits almost every corner of the football program. Particularly, Inside Carolina is reporting that Burney was cleared after the NCAA and UNC worked together to reach a resolution on Burney’s eligibility:

Burney missed the previous seven games. He was suspended six games for violations of NCAA agent benefits and preferential treatment rules and was held out of the Miami game while the University worked with the NCAA to determine his eligibility status.

Simultaneously, WRAL is reporting that Burney was reinstated after the UNC Honor Court made its ruling on Burney.

Burney was suspended by the NCAA for six games for accepting $1,333 in agent benefits that included trips to California, Atlanta and Las Vegas.

He served out that suspension and missed an additional game while the university honor court considered his case.

Which is it by the way? Did the NCAA have a hand in the clearing of Burney, or is this UNC’s unilateral circumvention of NCAA rules through preferential treatment of a student-athlete? Chances are good that the truth will never see the light of day as the UNC powers-that-be appear to continue their circling of the wagons around Baddour, Butch and the football program. (On a side note, the folks at SFN are still looking hard for the magical, mystical travel agent who can turn $1,333 into a trip to California, Atlanta, and Las Vegas.) The circling of the wagons is what we have all come to know as the “Carolina Way.” That term that we’ve heard so often in the past, the Carolina Way, is such an amorphous concept that is still difficult to define. Nonetheless, one thing is now certain:

In the case of Kendric Burney, the Spartan Way, the Terrapin Way, the Orangemen Way and the Blue Devil Way are all > The Carolina Way.

About WV Wolf

Graduated from NCSU in 1996 with a degree in statistics. Born and inbred in West "By God" Virginia and now live in Raleigh where I spend my time watching the Wolfpack, the Mountaineers and the Carolina Hurricanes as well as making bar graphs for SFN. I'm @wvncsu on the Twitter machine.

Big Four Rivals Editor's Picks Required Reading UNC Scandal

53 Responses to The Spartan Way > The Carolina Way

  1. Wufpacker 10/27/2010 at 10:45 AM #

    If the NCAA doesn’t have any concrete proof regarding how high up the stench goes, then I could see them providing a little rope just to verify who, if anyone, will take it. They might not use that rope as the linchpin of the case, but it might make a grey area a little more black and white for them.

    With the new NCAA leadership, who knows what they might try and/or be willing to do to root out a problem they see as serious.

  2. choppack1 10/27/2010 at 10:45 AM #

    “The change in grade affected Burney’s academic standing with the NCAA. The NCAA requires athletes to carry a minimum of 12 credit hours, unless as a senior they need fewer hours to graduate.

    Burney was on track to graduate in December, his father said, and is taking one class, or three credit hours, this semester. Since the grade was changed in the core class, Burney needs six hours to graduate. Under NCAA rules, he needs to be enrolled in six hours or receive a waiver from the NCAA to participate.

    Burney received the waiver and the school announced his return on Tuesday.”

    OK – I’m confused as hell. What kind of message is the NCAA sending on this one?

    You’ve got a player who rec’d improper benefits and was suspended for 6 games, AND he’s accused of cheating on an assignment. To top it off, in spite of knowledge of his tenuois situation, he takes the bare minimum course load…and he’s granted a waiver????

    GA – I’m wondering if what you said yesterday was correct – if this is any indication of how the NCAA will “punish” UNC, they may end up apologizing to Thorp, Baddour and Davis for inconveniencing them.

  3. newt 10/27/2010 at 10:47 AM #

    In many cases in college, if you missed more than 2 or 3 classes, teachers would drop your grade a full letter.

  4. Wufpacker 10/27/2010 at 10:48 AM #

    Re: Burney: If the extra 3 hours added is not the same core class, which he needs to graduate, AND if he can’t take that class again until spring, wouldn’t this then change his status regarding being on track to graduate? And wouldn’t THAT require that he needs not six, but TWELVE credit hours this semester to be eligible???

  5. newt 10/27/2010 at 10:54 AM #

    Here we go, from a UNC anthropology syllabus:

    “More than two unexcused absences from lecture will result in half a letter grade deduction from your final grade for each additional absence.”

    http://www.unc.edu/~killgrov/ANTH414/

    So whatever Burney did, it didn’t rise to the level of a third absence.

    I bet we could find dozens of UNC syllabi that include this type of language.

  6. Hungwolf 10/27/2010 at 11:11 AM #

    Davis going to do everything he can to get these players on the field. Winning is his way out. He pulls a winning year out of this and all the UNC fans proclaim him a hero. UNC fans already proclaiming him ACC coach and National Coach of the year. But don’t let Davis fool you, I bet his agent got instructions to put his name out there and find him another job. I see Davis bolting if he can and leaving UNC with the mess. Lou Holtz already told him; “Update your resume.” I am sure it has been.

  7. newt 10/27/2010 at 11:26 AM #

    Give these guys credit – Here are some UNC fans who get it (read the comments)…

    http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/2010/10/burney-cleared-to-play-vs-william-mary/

  8. GAWolf 10/27/2010 at 11:34 AM #

    At first I didn’t read the comments and thought you had lost your mind, Newt.

  9. wolf_at_my_door 10/27/2010 at 11:49 AM #

    Great reporting and discussion here.

    Shine a light on the dirty deeds of a dirty program.

    Shine a light for the whole world to see.

    These guys are rotten to the core and have no shame about it.

    The Carolina Way? The Carolina Way is a Joke!

  10. Sweet jumper 10/27/2010 at 11:50 AM #

    GAWolf, I agree, “just a little breaking of the honor code…let ’em play,” is the bottom line for me. The honor code at most schools is paramount. If a student(including student-athlete) is accused of violating the honor code, they are brought before the honor code committee for a hearing, and if the violation stands, they are dismissed. At least that is the way the honor code works at the college and the professional school where I was educated. UNX has lead us to believe that they also hold the honor code paramount. That is probably true for the regular students, but they have now shown that student-athletes are treated differently. We are just beginning to see the underbelly of the real Carowhina way that we have suspected for many decades.

  11. Old MacDonald 10/27/2010 at 12:07 PM #

    Three things

    1) So while getting an improper amount of “help” Burney/the Tutor were only able to get a “C”? They need better tutors.

    2) If he had gotten an “A” with an improper amount of help from a tutor, he only would have gone down to an A-?

    3) This whole Burney grade thing just does not withstand even the slightest amount of scrutiny/questions.

  12. choppack1 10/27/2010 at 12:09 PM #

    Old MacDonald – I agree – but evidently the NCAA granted him a waiver.

  13. cWOhLFrPAiCKs 10/27/2010 at 12:18 PM #

    I posted this in the forums, but is more poignant here:

    Listening to Gold and Ovies on the way home from work (yesterday), they were talking about the Burney clearing. They basically said (my interpretation) that

    a) A string was pulled or an exception was made for Burney regarding either the professor of the failed (read: CHEATED) course some how let him pass it (or something or that nature). [Obviously, this was not the case, as his grade was lowered enough to cause him to repeat the course…however, would there have been any difference had the grade actually been changed to an F? Would his GPA have been high enough at that point to stay in school?]

    or

    b) A string was pulled or an exception was made by the professor of another course that allowed him to enter it 3/4 of the way through the semester, thereby making him eligible. [This seems to be most likely what happened at this point, as I don’t see the NCAA telling UNC “Sure, he can play even though the reason he’s in this situation is he cheated…]

  14. Lunatic Fringe 10/27/2010 at 12:19 PM #

    Guys this is C-learly just a C-leriC-al error by the professor. Right professor?

  15. Alpha Wolf 10/27/2010 at 12:43 PM #

    nativeheel
    October 27, 2010 at 11:45 am

    If he is cleared to play that is good enough for me regardless of the process. It is about time we got a break from this crap anyway. I could care less what the ABC’ers think!
    Go Heels!!

    Yeah, that’s some fine example of the Carolina Way: it doesn’t matter how it happened, it’s good because poor us, we’re SO oppressed! And I don’t give a damn what anyone who isn’t a Tar Heel fan thinks either! Go Hayuls!

    I think that’s Tar Heel Fan (the person not the blog) in a nutshell.

    ps: “I could care less” means that you COULD care LESS. That’s some fine wordsmithing, Lou.

  16. bradleyb123 10/27/2010 at 1:00 PM #

    “On a bit of a sidenote, here is a quote by Butch Davis on redshirting Houston:

    “The resolution is if we need him to win games, we’re going to play him,” Davis said. “In the ideal situation that we would like not to.”

    That’s quite the lesson Butch is teaching his players. You can sit out for cheating (allegedly) unless we need to win.”

    I get the point you’re trying to make with this. But in this particular example, I don’t think the player (Houston) has been accused of any wrongdoing. He’s not talking about redshirting him to avoid penalizing him for breaking a rule. I think he means he’d like to redshirt him for the good of the program, unless they really need him this year. The same is true for most of the top programs in the nation — they redshirt many of their incoming freshmen for the good of the program.

  17. bradleyb123 10/27/2010 at 1:07 PM #

    cWOhLFrPAiCKs, could there be a third possibility? Maybe UNX told the NCAA that Burney needs that class, and will take it in the Spring. Can he still finish out this football season that ends in December, with the understanding that he’ll take the class in the Spring?

    If that’s even an option, it would seem risky. Because come Springtime, his eligibility is expired, and his focus will be on the NFL. Will he honor that commitment and take the class (doubt it!) And if he doesn’t, would Carolina then have to forfeit any wins they got with Burney on the field this year?

  18. WV Wolf 10/27/2010 at 1:13 PM #

    Houston sat out the first 5 games of the season so he must have done something. I get that Butch wants to redshirt him since he’s already missed half the year, I just don’t like the message it sends.

    And I don’t want this point to get lost in all the debate on redshirts, C minuses, hours towards graduation, etc. If Carolina held themselves to the same standards as Michigan St, Duke, Maryland and Syracuse, there would be no reason to be debating redshirts, C minues, hours towards graduation, etc. These guys would be done for the year. Period.

  19. packplantpath 10/27/2010 at 1:28 PM #

    Not necessarily WV. It is possible that Houston really did do nothing wrong. I don’t think it’s likely, but it’s possible.

    Either way, if the NCAA ruled that he had to serve a suspension of 2,3,4,5 games and he takes a redshirt for this year, he would have to serve the suspension next year.

  20. GAWolf 10/27/2010 at 1:41 PM #

    Didn’t they start their fourth string running back versus LSU? If so, that means they would have loved to have Houston on the field and redshirting him solely for the sake of redshirting him seems unlikely.

  21. bradleyb123 10/27/2010 at 1:45 PM #

    Houston sat out the first 5 games of the season so he must have done something. I get that Butch wants to redshirt him since he’s already missed half the year, I just don’t like the message it sends.

    But if Houston didn’t do anything wrong, then he needlessly missed the good part of this season. I could see why Butch would redshirt him. If Houston broke no rules, then why should he have to forfeit a high percentage of his season?

    I’m not excusing anything going on in Chapel Hill, mind you. But if a player is innocent, he shouldn’t be penalized.

    Maybe he was associated with the tutor, but didn’t actually cheat. If he had broken an NCAA rule, we’d know about it by now.

  22. wirogers 10/27/2010 at 2:00 PM #

    It has not been discussed, and we most likely will never know, but could there have been more shenanigans going on with the honor court than we see.

    How plausible is this, the honor court looked at the entire grade report and if they would have dropped him to a full ‘F’ for the class his overall grade point average would have been so low that he would not be eligible to play based on his overall average. Therefore, they just dropped it to a ‘C-‘ so he still has to take the class again, but it does not drop his overall grade point average.

    I do not think one ‘F’ would hurt an overall average (the ‘NCs’ that I received did not hurt mine – too bad) for most students. Just a thought.

    Either way, if I was cheating in a class I would like to have better than a C.

  23. highstick 10/27/2010 at 2:31 PM #

    If you’re gonna cheat, do better than a C…If you’re gonna break NCAA rules, at least win something!

    This whole situation is so revolting that it boggles the mind and the lack of publicity and attention on it by the BOG, the media, and the taxpayers of North Carolina is sickening. No way would I ever allow my child to attend that institution of corruption.

    I sincerely hope that this “NCAA rope” is really there cause they are just flaunting the corruption in Chapel Hill.

  24. baxter 10/27/2010 at 2:55 PM #

    It’s very possible that whatever the infraction Burney did commit, may not have been really worth the weight of an F overall, but a selected grade to be adjusted.

    I’ll give you an example of my own experience of dealing with a professor. It was found through an error on one single problem that propogated its way through a whole list of classmates homeworks, that a large portion of the class had used a solutions manual for one problem. I was one of these students. While I still contend that I taught myself outside of the class by using manuals to guide my problem solving method, I digress. When called into the professors office, they asked me what I thought should be done. I said give me a zero for the assignment. The professor said that was not enough, since this was the 5th assignment, my word can’t be trusted on my previous assignments. Even though we argued for about 10 minutes on this point, (my case being that if I had cheated on 4 other assignments, don’t you think I would have gotten better than a C on each) the professor said that they would not take my word for it, and gave me 5 0’s (they debated giving me a 0 for an exam, at which point I said I’d go straight to the dean and take my chances). I had to work my ass off for the entire semester after that to scrape out a passing grade after all that was done.

    Perhaps the honor court / professor deemed it to be only one act of “poor judgement” and decided the penalty be isolated to the one case instead of retroactively the entire course. The point being, is it is up to a higher power, whether it be a professor, honor court, dean, etc. to use their discretion in handing out a penalty.

  25. Wufpacker 10/27/2010 at 2:56 PM #

    Agreed that cheating and only getting a C is pretty pathetic. I’m curious, however, if it could be intentional. What I mean is, how suspicious would it look if a student athlete (or any student for that matter) who barely scores well enough on the SAT and/or barely has the GPA to qualify OR who is an academic exception (non or partial qualifier) suddenly starts getting A’s and B’s in college level courses.

    I don’t know off the top of my head what Burney’s “admission situation” was, but I could see them telling the tutor not to do TOO well on his or other athletes’ papers/assignments.

    Kind of like “Don’t overdo it, just keep him (them) eligible”.

Leave a Reply